"...the
theory and methods of polygraphic lie detection are not rocket science,
indeed, they are not science at all."
Emeritus
Professor
David T. Lykken (1928-2006)
"The
so-called 'control' question 'test' polygraph is a technological flight
of fancy. It is often used as a psychological rubber hose to induce
confessions. Founded on lies, it spreads distrust while posing as the
path to truth."
Emeritus Professor John
J. Furedy
"The
lie detector, in many places, is nothing more than a psychological third-degree aimed at extorting a confession as the old physical beatings were. At times I'm sorry I ever had any part in its development."
polygraph pioneer John A. Larson
"[Polygraph
screening] is completely without any theoretical foundation and has
absolutely no validity...the diagnostic value of this type of testing
is no more than that of astrology or tea-leaf reading."
former
Supervisory
Special Agent
Dr. Drew
C. Richardson,
FBI Laboratory Division
"Polygraph
testing has been the gold standard, but it's obviously fool's gold."
Prof.
Stephen E. Fienberg
Chairman, Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph,
National Academy of Sciences
"If
we had medical tests that had the same failure rate as a polygraph,
then physicians that use those tests would be convicted of malpractice."
Dr. Alan P. Zelicoff,
M.D.
"Polygraph
is more art than science, and unless an admission is obtained, the
final determination is frequently what we refer to as a scientific
wild-ass guess (SWAG)"
retired
CIA polygrapher
John F. Sullivan
"If
you choose to implement this astrology surrogate, and to treat us with
such deep disrespect, do not confuse our contempt for arrogance."
physicist
David
Dearborn
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
"People
in the security community are so wedded to polygraph testing that they
are just going to ignore the scientific facts about this."
scientist
Jeffrey D. Colvin
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
"Whether
it is screening applicants or screening employees, the polygraph is a
failure. I suspect that its days as a screening tool are deservedly
near an end."
former
FBI Special Agent
Mark Mallah
"The
US is, so far as I know, the only nation which places such extensive
reliance on the polygraph....It has gotten us into a lot of trouble."
convicted
spy
Aldrich
H. Ames
"[The
CIA's] reliance on the polygraph is truly insane"
former
CIA Director
John M. Deutch
"...the
use of this highly flawed instrument should be radically curtailed."
former
CIA Director
R. James Woolsey
"You have to go in there with a gladiator mentality."
retired FBI polygrapher
Jack Trimarco
"It's kind of like...confessing to a priest..."
T.V. O'Malley
Past President,
American Polygraph Association
"If
you come in concerned and scared, that's normal and a good thing."
David
M. Renzelman
Former DOE Polygraph
Program Chief
"I
don't know anything about polygraphs, and I don't know how accurate
they are, but I know they'll scare the hell out of people."
President
Richard
M.
Nixon
|
The dirty little secret behind the polygraph is that the
"test" depends on trickery, not science. The person being "tested" is
not supposed to know that while the polygraph operator declares that
all questions must be answered truthfully, warning that the slightest
hint of deception will be detected, he secretly assumes that denials in
response to certain questions -- called "control" questions -- will be
less than truthful. An example of a commonly used control question is,
"Did you ever lie to get out of trouble?" The polygrapher steers the
examinee into a denial by warning, for example, that anyone who would
do so is the same kind of person who would commit the kind of behavior
that is under investigation and then lie about it. But secretly, it is
assumed that everyone has lied to get out of trouble.
The polygraph pens don't do a special dance when a
person lies. The polygrapher scores the test by comparing physiological
responses (breathing, blood pressure, heart, and perspiration rates) to
these probable-lie control questions with reactions to relevant
questions such as, "Did you ever commit an act of espionage against the
United States?" (commonly asked in security screening). If the former
reactions are greater, the examinee passes; if the latter are greater,
he fails. If responses to both "control" and relevant questions are
about the same, the result is deemed inconclusive.
The test also includes irrelevant questions such
as,
"Are the lights on in this room?" The polygrapher falsely explains that
such questions provide a "baseline for truth," because the true answer
is obvious. But in reality, they are not scored at all! They merely
serve as buffers between pairs of relevant and "control" questions.
The simplistic methodology used in polygraph
testing has
no grounding in the scientific method: it is no more scientific than
astrology or tarot cards. Government agencies value it because people
who don't realize it's a fraud sometimes make damaging admissions. But
as a result of reliance on this voodoo science, the truthful are often
falsely branded as liars while the deceptive pass through.
Perversely, the "test" is inherently biased
against the
truthful, because the more honestly one answers the "control"
questions, and as a consequence feels less stress when answering them,
the more likely one is to fail. Conversely, liars can beat the test by
covertly augmenting their physiological reactions to the "control"
questions. This can be done, for example, by doing mental arithmetic,
thinking exciting thoughts, altering one's breathing pattern, or simply
biting the side of the tongue. Truthful persons can also use these
techniques to protect themselves against the risk of a false positive
outcome. Although polygraphers frequently claim they can detect such
countermeasures, no polygrapher has ever demonstrated any ability to do
so, and peer-reviewed research suggests that they can't.
Educate yourself. Before playing Russian roulette
with your
reputation, learn how to protect yourself against this invalid test.
Download AntiPolygraph.org's free book:
The Lie
Behind the Lie Detector
Polygraph
Countermeasure Challenge Clock
On 28
January 2002, retired FBI polygraph expert Dr. Drew C. Richardson reiterated his challenge
to the polygraph community to prove their claimed
ability to
detect countermeasures
(techniques
for passing -- or beating -- the polygraph). This clock figure shows the number of weeks
Dr. Richardson's challenge has gone without takers. What are the
polygraph operators afraid of? (Listen
to a personal message from Dr. Richardson.) |
362
weeks
 |
Los Angeles Sheriff's Office Latest Sucker to Buy Into Layered Voice Analysis
Los Angeles television station KABC news reports -- uncritically -- that the L.A. County Sheriff's Office has purchased, and will be fielding on an experimental basis, "Layered Voice Analysis" (LVA), an emperor's-new-clothes lie detection technology produced by the Israeli company Nemesysco and marketed by Voice Analysis Technologies.
Failed poly but innocent!
Monday morning a meeting was held at work stating that all of us that had access to money that was stolen would be taking a polygraph either Tuesday or Wednesday, except for one person who was out for medical reasons and would be tested at a later date....
Polygrapher John Swartz of Houston Reportedly Failed FBI Pre-Employment Polygraph!
Polygraph operator John S. Swartz of Houston, Texas -- a graduate of the U.S. Government's polygraph school and former Drug Enforcement Agency employee -- reportedly failed the drug-related portion of an FBI pre-employment polygraph administered in 2006.
Drew Peterson's Polygraph Results Discussed on the Dr. Phil Show
On 10 November 2008, the Dr. Phil show featured an interview with Drew Peterson, the former Illinois police officer who is a suspect in the disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, and the death of his third wife, Kathleen Savio.
Mumbai Attacker Reportedly Subjected to Polygraph "Testing" -- "Truth Serum" to Follow
CNN reports that the lone gunman reportedly taken alive in the recent attack on Mumbai, India has been subjected to a polygraph test, while The Times of London reports that Indian authorities are preparing to inject him with "truth serum."
Cruel Joke: U.S. Exports Polygraphy to Iraq
In an article titled, "Iraq Turns to Lie Detectors to Outsmart Al-Qaeda," Agence France Presse (AFP) reports on the graduation of the first class of U.S. Government-trained Iraqi polygraph operators. But to outsmart Al-Qaeda, doesn't one need to be smarter than Al-Qaeda?
Failed FBI Polygraph... confused
First of all... like many others say. Wow! I wish I had come here before I took my polygraph. I'll put as much info as I can if it helps anyone, so bear with my story....
Dr. Phil Show (26 Nov. 2008) - Polygrapher Jack Trimarco Says Philanderer Is a Pedophile
Today's (Wednesday, 26 November 2008) installment of the Dr. Phil show, titled, "A Husband's Double Life" features lurid details of Michael's bisexual infidelity to his wife, Elaine plus a titillating bonus: a trial by polygraph to determine whether Michael -- a self-described "sex addict" and father of three young children -- is a pedophile to boot. There is no allegation that Michael has ever sexually abused any child.
Ironic Humor in American Polygraph Association Crapshoot Challenge Coin
An APA commemorative medallion bears an ironically appropriate motif.
San Diego Police Department Polygraph = HORRIBLE Experience
Well I took a polygraph for the SDPD on the 4th and it was the worst experience ever. I went into it a little nervous just because it was a polygraph but I figured I would just tell the truth and I'd be alright. I actually believed in the science and that lie detectors worked because if they didn’t why would so many places use them right?
El Paso Police Chief Calls Polygraph a "Piece of Junk"
Speaking in unusually blunt terms for a senior law enforcement official, El Paso, Texas chief of police Greg Allen has decried the polygraph as a "piece of junk," while El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association president Bobby Holguin has pronounced it "garbage."
Personal Statement of an Anonymous NSA Applicant
...I was sent back to one of the polygraph rooms for examination. I was asked the espionage questions and then the serious crime questions, but apparently I am a spy because I could not pass the espionage question....
Polygrapher John Grogan Sues Polygraphers Joseph Paolella, Jack Trimarco, and Ralph Hilliard
On 30 May 2008, polygrapher John L. Grogan of Woodland Hills, California filed a lawsuit against fellow Los Angeles area polygraphers Joseph Paolella and Jack Trimarco as well as PolygraphPlace.com and TruthAboutGrogan.org proprietor Ralph Hilliard of Canton, Georgia. Twenty "Does" are also included among the defendants. Grogan seeks damages in excess of one million dollars from each of the defendants for defamation....

Copyright © 2000-2009 AntiPolygraph.org.
All Rights Reserved
|
|
For the
truth about polygraph "tests"
and how to pass
(or beat) them:

Download
The Lie Behind the Lie Detector
(1 mb PDF)
Join
Discussion List
by Sending E-mail to:
antipolygaph-
subscribe@
topica.com
You're
Not Supposed to Know This:

Download
the Federal Psychophysiological Detection of Deception Examiner's Handbook (964
kb PDF)
And You're
Not Supposed to Know This:

Download
the
Department of Defense Polygraph Institute's Law Enforcement
Pre-Employment Test Examiner's Guide (1 mb
kb PDF)
You're
Not Supposed to Know This Either:

Download
the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute's Interview and
Interrogation Handbook (1.6
mb PDF)
Nor Are you Supposed to Know This:

Download
the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute Numerical Evaluation Scoring System (376 kb PDF)
Help
Spread the Truth About Lie Detectors

Download
Posters Here

1938
ad featuring lie detector inventor William Moulton Marston
(5.2 mb PDF)


AntiPolygraph.org On-line Store

|