If the FBI subpoenas a person's credit record, the target of the investigation won't see that on his credit report. Similarly, if a person's emails are being monitored, the target won't see any indication of that.

If the target of an investigation is under physical surveillance, it is possible that the target will detect this. Physical surveillance is expensive and relatively rare.

A person's residence abroad complicates investigations. However, the United States has Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) with numerous countries, and the FBI has legal attaché offices at some U.S. embassies:

https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/legal-attache-offices

If the target of an investigation is using an American phone service, email provider, or messaging app, the FBI could directly subpoena the service provider. Assistance could also be sought from foreign governments.

In addition, if a target's mobile number is known, technical means exist to monitor that number's calls, texts, and location data exist owing to weaknesses in the SS7 protocol used in cellular telephony:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signalling_System_No._7#Protocol_security_vulnerab...

In short, if a person is under criminal investigation by the FBI, that person probably won't know about it until he or she, or an acquaintance, is contacted by the FBI.

Aside from having the FBI knock on your door asking you to answer a few questions, is there a way to tell if you under criminal investigation?  I am not talking about for a security clearance.  I am referring to the FBI suspecting you of a federal crime.

Are there any signs like your credit being checked, ways to spot surveillance, or anything of the sort?  Can a person tell if their emails are being monitored?

What if you live in another country, does that limit how much investigating the FBI can do on you?  Can the FBI monitor any of your phone calls or app messages if you are in another country?  If so, how?

- Person of Interest

A "Case Management Conference" is set for Tuesday, 28 September 2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Ashley Zuckerman.

The hearing is to be held via Zoom:

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/94110438096?pwd=TjVsQ3ROYWZQcklZbjV3RkdRTUd5Zz09

Meeting ID: 94110438096
Password: 208540

RobbieG wrote on Sep 18^th, 2021 at 8:34pm:


I am not aware of any kind of experiment that could be done to confirm or disconfirm this.

George,

Is it possible to confirm that Google is indeed manipulating something here? I don’t know much about this stuff, but I wonder if an SEO expert or someone like that could run some kind of experiment.

E. Owen,

Yahoo serves results from Bing, and Bing Webmaster tools also shows virtually no traffic to AntiPolygraph.org based on keyword searches for "polygraph." The following screenshot indicates that over the past three months, Bing searches for "polygraph" yielded one click on AntiPolygraph.org:



In any event, Google searches are the metric that matters most, because Google commands about 90% of the global search market.

George

Have you checked the search stats on the other engines:

1.  BING

2.  YAHOO

Searches of BING and YAHOO here in Toronto rank you real high.  Same thing goes for Google for the most part.

Supposedly BING is getting more and more popular.

Does anyone know if that mumbling knuckle-head Bill Endler is still teaching for NITV? I see he is still listed on their website as an instructor.

Using Tor Browser, you can download or complete online and score all 567 questions of the MMPI-2:

http://5xmie4ddggpemlz4xy5nccto2feb72f6lv4lsyqyacrai3vpwmuueead.onion/mmpi.htm

Google's effective de-listing of AntiPolygraph.org on the search term "polygraph" continues, and if anything, is even worse than the last time (in 2018) that I posted an update to this thread. The following is a screen shot from Google Search Console:



The chart shows that over the past 16 months, Google reports 26.6 thousand impressions for the search word “polygraph,” with an average position of 24.9, and only 90 total clicks, for an average click through rate of just 0.3%.

In my opinion, something is not kosher here.