Pseudoscientist “Dr.” Charles Humble Attempts to Censor AntiPolygraph.org

Charles Wayne Humble in “Heartbeat of America” promotional video

AntiPolygraph.org has received a rather unpleasant letter from James D’Loughy, a lawyer representing NITV Federal Services, LLC (NITV), which markets a scientifically baseless voice-based lie detector called the “Computer Voice Stress Analyzer,” and its president, self-described “Renaissance Man” “Dr.” Charles Humble (who has not received a doctoral degree from any accredited institute of higher education).

In his letter, D’Loughy, of the law firm Advisorlaw, which specializes in helping clients protect their assets from creditors, demands that AntiPolygraph.org remove twelve URLs that comprise a substantial portion of the website.

NITV’s offices at 11400 Fortune Circle, West Palm Beach, Florida (Google Street View)

AntiPolygraph.org is a non-profit, public interest website dedicated to exposing and ending waste, fraud, and abuse associated with polygraphs and other pseudoscientific “lie detectors,” including voice stress analyzers.

D’Loughy avers that a default judgment in a lawsuit NITV filed against its competitor, Dektor PSE, and which, among other things, compelled Dektor to remove a website with content critical of NITV, also compels AntiPolygraph.org—which was not a party to this litigation and which has no privity with Dektor—to remove the twelve links.

NITV’s contention that its judgment against Dektor binds AntiPolygraph.org is absurd. Through our counsel, noted attorney (and former Westchester County, New York police commissioner) George N. Longworth of the law firm Grant & Longworth, we have declined NITV’s demand to remove the twelve links.

While NITV’s demand is without merit, it does serve to highlight the content on AntiPolygraph.org that most upsets NITV and “Dr.” Charles Humble, so it’s worth examining these links here:

  1. A recent blog post titled Federal Judge Orders Immediate Removal of Website Critical of Computer Voice Stress Analysis;
  2. A blog post from 2018 titled NITV Hires Disgraced Ex-Cop Jerry W. Crotty II as Director of Law Enforcement Operations;
  3. A message board thread titled Jury Returns $575,000 Award Against NITV for Defamation;
  4. Every post on the AntiPolygraph.org News blog tagged “CVSA”;
  5. The entire AntiPolygraph.org News blog (yes, really);
  6. A blog post about a presentation on polygraph pre-test interviews (we are uncertain why this is of concern to NITV and Humble, who are not mentioned in the post);
  7. All blog posts in the category “voice stress” (the demand at #5 that we delete the entire blog should have covered this);
  8. A message board thread dating to 2011 titled Canadian police and press believe in CVSA;
  9. A blog post from 2009 titled Baker DVSA Loses a Customer;
  10. The RSS feed for our message board forum on “CVSA and other Voice Stress Analysis Applications;”
  11. Search results for “cvsa” on our blog;
  12. A recent blog post titled NITV Threatens Competitor’s IT Consultant with Federal Lawsuit

For background on NITV and Charles Humble, see ABC Primetime’s 2006 investigative report on the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer:

11 thoughts on “Pseudoscientist “Dr.” Charles Humble Attempts to Censor AntiPolygraph.org”

  1. Anything to contribute to the prison industrial complex will be dangerous to the population, follow the money and you shall see who is behind this unproven nonsense.

  2. If any of these products worked, it would be easy to tell. First, they would require almost no training. They would absolutely, without question, require ZERO interpretation on the part of the person operating the system. It would be entirely automated. Second, if you said “This statement is a lie.” to the machine, it would explode.

    1. @Dustin Rodriguez I think you’re a little bit off on both of your points.

      At the minimum, a working deception detector might produce a confidence level associated with deception. It may also produce multidimensional results, along the lines of “82% for fabrication, 38% for omission.” These kinds of results would require interpretation.

      Second, the goal is not to produce a contradiction detector, it’s to produce a deception detector. There’s a *huge* difference. You don’t have to solve both the halting problem and disprove Gödel’s incompleteness theorems to detect that somebody is lying. (Also, although it’s a classical paradox, “this statement is a lie” is not really a paradox, because “lie” is not the same as “false.” Lying is not a logical or mathematical construct, it’s a human construct.)

  3. Both the polygraph and the VSA are nothing more than stress detectors. Neither of which are “Lie Detectors.” They detect and display the level of stress someone is experiencing at the time it is collected. Experience and observation have shown that when someone tells a lie, and the lie is connected to some form of jeopardy, that person experiences emotional stress. The big question is, what caused the stress? Was it the telling of a lie (connected to the consequence of jeopardy), or something else, i.e. situational stress caused by the way the examination was conducted? In my opinion, only a well trained and experienced examiner would be able to tell the difference. I have been using VSA since 2003, and it has proven itself invaluable at ferreting out the truth. In the infamous words of Julius Caesar, “People readily believe what they want to believe.”

  4. “Dr.” Charles Humble is employing a tactic used by Stalin, Hitler and other dictators. Humble is anti-American is that he is attempting to suppress free speech, in what appears to be a SLAPP suit to try to shut down his critics. A victory over the equally bogus no show Dektor does not give Humble the right to suppress free speech. I am a military veteran and a firm defender of what America stands for, I do not take kindly to those trying to take away my rights that so many Americans have paid the ultimate price to secure. All so-called lie detectors, especially VSA is modern day witch craft. Humble, whom was totally punked by journalist Brian Ross, and avoids any sort of science based double bind studies to prove his “instrument” is actually effective wants us to believe that this contraction only works under jeopardy.
    Gobbels said if a lie is told enough, people will believe it, and Nazi Charlie vis-a-vis the CVSA has put in money making, destroyer of lives witch craft above what is best for America.
    Brian Ross and company have totally exposed the CVSA, and I do not need to re-hash the report on this over priced prop.
    One additional point that was missed by ABC, and anti-polygraph is that the “training” is given in Florida. Man, I’m sure the “examiners” in the northern states, say around January look forward to a week vacation is sunny Florida on the tax payer’s $10,000 dime.

  5. I am waiting to see how this obvious SLAPP suit brought by Humble and his lawyers against antipolygraph develops. I am respectfully requesting that this web site keeps us abreast of developments.
    I came from a fairly strong academic background in mathematics, science and technology, and have also picked up strong skills and knowledge is the social sciences as well as criminology through my career. Therefore, I knew the CVSA was a total fraud the first time I saw the device. One can perhaps draw a similarity between Charles Humble with his CVSA, and L. Ron Hubbard and his e-meter. This would make for an interesting thesis for someone working on a Master’s degree.
    What is incredible scary is that many people still believe of the infallibility of the polygraph industry. It is one thing to see daytime trash TV using a polygraph to “find out” if the bum boyfriend is cheating with the skank on the other side of the projects – but what really scares me is so many in management positions are wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on devices that have no serious scientific merit to back up their claims. And it just ain’t the money – how many CJ careers have been destroyed by Humble et al? How many CJ careers were never allowed to begin because a promising individual was eliminated due to a “failed” CVSA test?
    One of the proudest moments in my career was being instrumental in getting my employer to admit the CVSA is a sham, and no longer allowing its use. I accomplished this by showing the Brian Ross video on Youtube to some decision makers including politicians with oversight responsibilities.
    I continue to request that all of us freedom loving people, and those who sincerely care about justice, as well as professionalism in all aspects of the CJ fields to continue the fight against Humble and all other bad actors in the so-called lie detector industry. Once again, thank you to the folks at antipolygraph.org.

    1. Humble has not filed a lawsuit against AntiPolygraph.org. He only had his lawyer, James D’Loughy, send the above-referenced threatening letter. We have not heard from Humble or anyone working for him since then.

      1. Thanks for getting back with me so soon. I must have misread your earlier post.
        I forgot to mention this on my earlier post: I would encourage anyone that has been harmed by the CVSA to seek legal redress. If you have been a victim, please show your attorney the Brian Ross video. If I was a lawyer, I would be tempted to seek out victims of CVSA and its ilk for legal action. See the Crowe lawsuit for example.

        1. I have been watching Sciencetology and L. Ron Hubbard videos of late on YouTube of late.
          It then struck me of how similar L.Ron and Charles Humble are to each other. I have come up with a quick few, and will add others later.
          1. Taking credit for others work on derivitives of the discredited polygraph. With Hubbard, it is the emeter, with Humble, it is the coin toss CVSA.
          2. Both acquired fake Ph.Ds. The ability of both these clowns to BS others cannot be disbuted, but both lacked the intellectual horsepower for real doctorate degrees, much like a fake SEAL lacks the fitness for advanced military training.
          3. Both clowns claim to be renaissance men. Let’s see, Charlie is a chef, pilot, singer, guitarist and artist. But L. Ron outshines Charlie. L. Ron claimed to be a nuclear physicist, world explorer, alpha warrior, pilot, writer, religion founder, volunteer probation officer, ship captain, inventor, et al. Charlie needs to step up his game.
          3. Both have used, and still use lawyers to attack truth telling critics. L.Ron’s are scarier. They scared the IRS. The one that wrote the mean letter to AP looks like a
          girl.
          More comparisons to come.

  6. I am enjoying the drama lawsuits the of the voice stress crowd. As I understand, NITV knocked out Dektor, and “Dr.” Charlie is now suing “Dr.” Gary since Charlie lost an earlier lawsuit to Gary. What I am pondering is why the voice stress crowd does not sue some of the makers and users of polygraphs instead of each other.
    Danny “Ringworm” Ribacoff has publicly stated the CVSA specifically does not work, and is a piece of garbage after scolding a woman that paid $300 to a CVSA examiner to “prove” she wasn’t cheatin’ on her man. Ringworm Ribacoff gave her the polygraph, and “proved” she was indeed cheating on her man.
    Charlie had his lawyer send an absurd letter to anti-polygraph to cease and desist and stop telling the truth on his garbage box, and demand that AP follow the CVSA narrative. So, why can’t Charles send a cease and desist letter to Ringworm Ribacoff?
    Come on Charlie, grow a pair and sue the bastard.

Leave a Reply to Sarah G Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.