U.S. Customs and Border Protection Internal Affairs Documentation

cbp-ia-emblemAntiPolygraph.org has obtained a copy of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Assistant Commissioner for Internal Affairs James F. Tomsheck’s “CBP-IA Five Year Report” (4.4 mb) showcasing his office’s performance from Fiscal Years 2008 to 2012. CBP-IA is the office behind Operation Lie Busters, an effort to criminalize the teaching of polygraph countermeasures. Assistant Commissioner Tomsheck concludes in his 29-page report that he’s doing a good job. Excerpt:

I am pleased to present this five-year report which details the successes the employees of the Office of Internal Affairs (IA) have achieved during fiscal years 2008 through 2012. The accomplishments described in this report highlight the dedication and commitment of every IA employee who performs his or her duties in an exemplary manner in support of CBP’s mission to secure our nation’s borders while fostering legitimate travel and trade.

Tomsheck fails to note Department of Homeland Security Privacy Officer Mary Ellen Callahan’s 18 July 2012 report of investigation documenting his gross violations of DHS privacy policy.

CBP-IA’s polygraph unit, called the “Credibility Assessment Division,” is reviewed at pp. 19-20. Operation Lie Busters is not mentioned. Excerpt:

Five years ago, the Credibility Assessment Diivision (CAD) existed only as a vision in the minds of CBP leadership. Faced with unprecedented hiring surges designed to secure our nation’s borders, and the knowledge that rapid expansion of law enforcement agencies had historically caused a dramatic increase in corruption within those agencies, IA requested authority to establish a polygraph program within CBP-IA. With support from the Commissioner, IA obtained the required authority from OPM to begin a polygraph pre-employment screening program for applicants for CBP law enforcement positions.

In January 2008, the first 12 newly-hired certified polygraph examiners arrived at the National Center for Credibility Assessment (NCCA) to train on the LEPET polygraph format, which was designed for law enforcement screening. In February 2008, CAD deployed its first operational mission to Dallas, in collaboration with PSD, several HRM components, and Border Patrol.

The results of the polygraph examinations were profound and revealing. Many applicants successfully completed the polygraph process and were quickly sent to Basic Agent Training at Artesia, NM. However, 58% of the applicants failed to successfully complete the polygraph and were found unsuitable. Their admissions confirmed the reliability of the polygraph process.

The first independent inspection of CBP’s polygraph program by NCCA’s Quality Assurance Program provided an in-depth look at 118 functional and operational CAD criteria. The inspection team concluded their review with no derogatory findings, and affirmed the strong foundation upon which the CBP polygraph program had been established.

The biennial inspection by NCCA’s Quality Assurance Program again identified no derogatory findings of weaknesses or flaws in the CAD polygraph program. To the contrary, three areas of “strength” were identified (two quality control program management areas and polygraph program statistics regarding admission/confession rate). This was an unprecedented finding that established CBP as the leader among the 26 federal agencies with a polygraph capability.

AntiPolygraph.org is interested in hearing from federal polygraph examiners regarding CBP-IA’s status as “the leader among the 26 federal agencies with a polygraph capability.” Comments may be posted below, anonymously if you prefer.

The five-year report also provides budgetary information regarding CBP-IA as a whole and the Credibility Assessment Division (CAD) in particular. A chart at p. 9 shows that the CAD’s budget was $5,627,583 in FY 2009 (its first year), $5,627,583 in FY 2010, $7,959,893 in FY 2011, and $11,414,174 in FY 2012. The chart shows that  as CAD’s budget was doubling from 2009 to 2012, the budget of the Personnel Security Division, which conducts background investigations, fell from $113,436,602 in FY 2009 to $81,156,746 in FY 2012, suggesting that background investigations are being shortchanged in favor of lie detector tests.

In addition to CBP-IA’s five-year report, AntiPolygraph.org has also obtained a CBP-IA organizational chart (160 kb PDF) current as of circa 5 December 2012 and a 23 May 2013 CBP-IA memorandum by Chris Pignone, Acting Director, Investigative Operations Division and Jeffrey Matta, Acting Director, Integrity Programs Division, titled “Reminder on IPD reporting structure” (156 kb PDF). The memo notes that “the Integrity Programs Division (IPD) is the research, analysis and education component of CBP/IA.” The memo describes the director of IPD as being “joined at the hip” with IOD (Investigative Operations Division) and CAD (the polygraph unit).

Update: A newer CBP-IA organizational chart (209 kb), current as of June 2013, is now available.

2 thoughts on “U.S. Customs and Border Protection Internal Affairs Documentation”

  1. Almost 12 million dollars to fund a polygraph program for one agency!?!? All I can say is the thugs in Big Brother’s Ministry of Truth are very well paid! I wonder how many polygraph “tests” were administered for all that money? That would tell us how much we paid for each tea leaf reading session!

    When he says 58% “failed”, that tells us the terrible price that was paid in human suffering alone. There is no way 58% of the applicants made admissions that would disqualify them – they “failed” simply because the polygraph operator said they did! What a terrible waste of monetary and human resources.

  2. Let’s fast forward to 2016 in which CBP is still using the polygraph test to weed out potential employees. The Academy of Science has come out, saying that the polygraph is highly inaccurate and unreliable. Yet it’s business as usual in DC, and big business it is. I have worked for CBP going on 15 years; I started out as a Border Patrol Agent and now work as a supervisor for Customs. I recently attended training with other supervisors and the one topic that kept coming up is when are we going to get rid of the polygraph?

    This exam is unwanted by the people that matter and work the line every day, keeping America safe. But unfortunately we have a bunch of overpaid bellhops (GS 15s) who do not have a clue what we need out in the field who blindly throw money at the polygraph because they don’t know how to hire good employees. All we need is better training and more money to the background investigations.

    My wife, who I have know for 9 years was a former Customs Officer and left the service for a few years ands then tried to get hired with Border Patrol. Unfortunately she was required to take a polygraph exam in which she passed the integrity portion but failed the drug portion and the examiner straight out yelled at her calling her a liar. Now problem one, how can you pass the integrity portion yet be found a liar on the drug portion? When she asked that question of the examiner, his response was, “well you were borderline on the integrity portion, but I decided to give it to you.” Wow! so now is the test not only unreliable, but now you have examiners that are incompetent. As I mentioned my wife is a former Customs Officer who did a stint in the Commissioner’s Situation Room and received several accommodations while she was there, she is a marathon runner, and has completed 30 mile trail runs the mountains, she is a kidney donor (there are not too many live kidney donors) and she has a master’s degree. Does this sound like a drug user to you? Because the lack of integrity by the CAD and the polygraph system, she is unable to get a job for CBP the requires a polygraph for three years.

    The commissioner needs to be honest and do the right thing. Get rid of the polygraph! We are losing too many qualified applicants because of a system that is more hocus pocus, tea leaf reader and basically witch doctor practice.

    Oh, by the way, William Marston also the creator of Wonder Woman had a mistress and refused to divorce or get rid of his mistress. So now we have man who created the polygraph, but had no integrity himself and was your basic piece of trash.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.