“FBI Agent Helps Clear Man Held After 9-11”

Associated Press writer Kimberly Hefling reports how an innocent suspect failed his FBI polygraph “test,” while his lying accuser passed. Excerpt:

EVANSVILLE, Ind. (AP) – An FBI agent who helped arrest eight Egyptian men in the weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks became the driving force behind clearing their names, an arduous process that eventually led to a rare public apology from the FBI.

FBI Agent Thomas Van Wormer said he felt a responsibility to help the men, whose names cropped up on a far-reaching database – paired with the word “terrorism” – even after they were cleared of suspicion.

The database had nightmarish consequences for the men: One missed two flights home from an overseas trip when his name showed up on a no-fly list. Others had problems getting public housing and immigration cards.

“I want to commend them for the way they acted,” Van Wormer said from his office in downtown Evansville. “It made it so you wanted to help them. Their demeanor was to their benefit.”

Van Wormer began investigating the men after one of their wives called a law-enforcement hotline set up after Sept. 11, 2001. She said one of the men “would be traveling to Chicago’s O’Hare airport, was going to engage in a suicide crash, and that he would be dead on Oct. 12, 2001,” according to federal documents.

The woman passed a lie-detector test, but her husband – using an interpreter to take the test – showed some signs of deception, although he did not blatantly lie, Van Wormer said.

The woman then alleged other men were also involved. Authorities became more suspicious when they learned one of the men, Tarek Albasti, had taken pilot lessons.

The men were taken into custody on material-witness warrants and spent about a week in a Chicago detention center. Investigators released the group after deciding the woman’s statements were not true. Van Wormer said cultural and language barriers were likely to blame for the man’s lie-detector test results.

Actually, the inherent unreliability of polygraphy is more likely to blame for the man’s lie detector “test” results. In addition, bias introduced because of the man’s wife having “passed” was also a likely contributing factor. The case of the Evansville Eight is a good example of how our government’s misplaced reliance on the pseudoscience of polygraphy leads to investigative misdirection. For further examples, see Chapter 2 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *