Polygraph Discussion on Witwatersrand University Radio Academy Program “The Science Inside”

Among the topics addressed in the 26 June 2018 episode of the Witswatersrand (Wits) University radio program and podcast “The Science Inside” was polygraph “testing.” Those interviewed for this segment by program editor Elna Sch├╝tz include Niel Visser, a retailer who has been subjected to workplace polygraph “testing,” Clifton Coetzee, a practitioner of a variety of pseudosciences including polygraphy, voice stress analysis, statement analysis, and physiognomy, and AntiPolygraph.org co-founder George Maschke. The polygraph segment begins about 36 minutes into the program.

“Aldrich Ames Speaks Out on Polygraph Testing”

Steven Aftergood reports in today’s edition of the electronic newsletter Secrecy News:

ALDRICH AMES SPEAKS OUT ON POLYGRAPH TESTING

“The U.S. is, so far as I know, the only nation which places such extensive reliance on the polygraph…. It has gotten us into a lot of trouble.”

That is the verdict of convicted spy Aldrich H. Ames, who is serving a life sentence at Allenwood federal penitentiary in White Deer, Pennsylvania. During his career at the CIA as a spy for the Soviet Union and for Russia, Ames was notoriously successful in evading detection by the counterintelligence polygraph exam.

Ames provided extensive comments on polygraph testing in a November 28 letter to the Federation of American Scientists that he wrote in response to a recent essay on the subject in Science Magazine.

“Like most junk science that just won’t die (graphology, astrology and homeopathy come to mind), because of the usefulness or profit their practitioners enjoy, the polygraph stays with us.”

“Its most obvious use is as a coercive aid to interrogators, lying somewhere on the scale between the rubber truncheon and the diploma on the wall behind the interrogator’s desk. It depends upon the overall coerciveness of the setting — you’ll be fired, you won’t get the job, you’ll be prosecuted, you’ll go to prison — and the credulous fear the device inspires. This is why the [congressional] Redmond report ventures into the simultaneously ludicrous and sinister reality that citizens’ belief in what is untrue must be fostered and strengthened. Rarely admitted, this proposition is of general application for our national security apparatus,” Ames wrote.

“The national security state has many unfair and cruel weapons in its arsenal, but that of junk science is one which can be fought and perhaps defeated….”

The full text of the letter from Ames is posted here:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ames.html