FBI Agent Rita Chiang’s Career Ruined Following Failed Polygraph

In “Web of Suspicion: An Agent’s Career Ruined,” Los Angeles Times staff writer H.G. Reza reports on the case of retired FBI special agent Rita Chiang, whose career was cut short in the aftermath of a failed polygraph screening examination. This case is eerily similar to that of former FBI special agent Mark Mallah and is an example of precisely the kind of self-inflicted wound that retired FBI scientist and supervisory special agent Dr. Drew C. Richardson, Ph.D. warned against in a February 2001 memo to then FBI Director Louis Freeh. Freeh, who never responded, began a program of increased reliance on polygraph screen in the aftermath of the Robert Hanssen espionage case — a policy made permanent by his successor, current FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III. It’s worth noting that Leandro Aragoncillo, the only FBI spy caught since Hanssen, passed his polygraph. L.A. Times reporter H.G. Reza writes:

The two male agents pictured with Rita Chiang in the FBI poster were smiling, but her stare left no doubt that she was all business. Chiang was a recruiting magnet for the FBI, but it was her skill as an investigator that got her noticed.

The photo appeared in magazines and on billboards throughout the country in the 1990s, the picture cropped so tightly that only a sliver of her face could be seen. Anonymity was an asset in her job, where she matched wits with agents from the People’s Republic of China in the furtive world of counterintelligence.

But on Jan. 14, 2002, Chiang was stripped of her badge and gun and escorted out of the West Los Angeles office. FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III suspected that she was a mole for Chinese intelligence and ordered her suspended with pay while she was investigated.

Chiang was later cleared when her boss was identified as the security leak, but she contends that by then her reputation was ruined and her career derailed. She filed a discrimination suit against the agency, but it was tossed out of court. The case is on appeal, but her lawyer concedes it has been all but impossible to overcome the FBI’s position that her case — if it went to trial — could jeopardize national security.

Chiang’s boss — the security leak — was John J. Smith, who had a long running extra-marital affair with confidential informant Katrina M. Leung. For past discussion of the Smith-Leung affair and its connection with polygraph policy, see Ex-FBI Agent and Informant Accused in Spy Case.

To this day, Chiang says she has never seen the evidence that triggered her suspension, not even the results of a failed polygraph test that apparently provided the first suspicion that she was a mole.

During her 10-month suspension, Chiang said she was uncertain why she had been whisked from the bureau that day.

“It was torturous. I lost 20 pounds. I had to seek counseling to make sure I wasn’t going to do something stupid to myself,” Chiang, 53, said during a recent interview. “They took me back, but it wiped out my whole career. I’m ruined in terms of my identity as an FBI agent and professional.”

Chiang’s story is virtually unknown outside the covert world she traveled in, and her fight for justice became a mere detail in one of the biggest sex-and-spy scandals to rock the FBI.

But her discrimination lawsuit offers a rare glimpse into the inner workings of the Los Angeles China Squad during one of the FBI’s lowest moments.

Information gleaned from the 2005 lawsuit and an FBI inspector general’s report filed the following year shows that Chiang popped into the bureau’s cross hairs in the summer of 2001, when the FBI began looking into reports that Chinese intelligence had infiltrated the China Squad. The unit is a special team that keeps tabs on Chinese spies and their attempts to steal U.S. technology.

A subsequent investigation identified Chiang’s boss, squad leader James J. Smith, as the security risk. Katrina Leung, a Chinese American described in the inspector general’s report as Smith’s informant and lover and a spy for the People’s Republic of China, was also exposed.

Chiang returned to her job in November 2002 but with several caveats, including that her computer use would be monitored, Chiang said. Court records show that she worked under a “risk mitigation” plan, because, FBI officials said, she “probably harbors significant resentment for the process she has been through.”

The price of the investigation was steep: Though cleared, she was viewed with even deeper suspicion. “They said I was a bigger security risk because now I had a grudge against the bureau,” said Chiang.

She retired in 2006 after a 21-year career.

Chiang believes she came under suspicion because she is Chinese American. “That’s the only explanation I can derive from self-examination and review.”

But Mueller, in a statement filed with the court, said it was the polygraph test, not ethnicity, that led to her suspension. FBI officials declined to comment.

Let all FBI employees then be put on notice that they may be arbitrarily suspended merely because their polygraph squiggles zigged when they should have zagged. A leaflet produced by the FBI Polygraph Unit about its “Personnel Security Polygraph Program” states regarding the rights of those who fail the polygraph:

Q: If it is determined that I have failed my polygraph, what recourse do I have?
A: The SPM or other appropriate officials within the Counterintelligence Division will conduct a review or investigation to explain your polygraph test results. A Senior Review Panel (SRP) composed of the Assistant Directors or their designees from your division, the Counterintelligence Division, the Office of Professional Responsibility, and the Administrative Services Division will monitor the equity and reasonableness of the PSP process. The General Counsel or his designee will participate on the panel as a legal advisor. The SRP will also reserve the right to invite representatives of other FBI components, as appropriate, to provide counsel. The SRP will consider both the requirement to safeguard national security and the rights of those taking the test.

Given Chiang’s experience, it would seem that the foregoing is little more than bureaucratic mumbo jumbo and that FBI employees who fail the polygraph have no recourse. Reporter H.G. Reza continues:

Government attorneys argued that Mueller acted legally and for national security reasons when he suspended Chiang while the FBI attempted to “locate a suspected mole.” A U.S. District Court judge in Los Angeles dismissed the suit, ruling that she could not sue the FBI because federal law prevents employees from challenging an employment action taken for national security reasons.

Getting a job as an FBI agent was not easy for someone born in Taiwan. Chiang’s family settled in South San Francisco after her father retired as a Taiwanese diplomat. She was hired in 1984 after becoming a U.S. citizen and undergoing an extensive background check.

“She’s a recruiter’s dream,” said retired FBI Agent Chris Loo, who recruited Chiang. “She’s sharp, analytical and speaks Cantonese and Mandarin. Rita was no ordinary agent.” Loo said she was the FBI’s first female Chinese American agent.

Jo Craycraft, a retired FBI agent who also worked in counterintelligence in Los Angeles, said she never doubted Chiang’s honesty and loyalty.

“Without resorting to exaggeration, Rita is a great agent. She was an excellent mentor for me and for her squad,” Craycraft said. “She didn’t have very many equals.”

According to court records, Chiang received “the highest annual performance rating possible,” even while she was on suspension.

Mueller’s statement, dated March 31, 2004, said he suspended her because she failed the polygraph test, in which she was asked if she had ever spied against the United States. He said the suspension was also based on his personal “knowledge of other specific national security risk and vulnerability factors,” which he did not list.

In a signed statement included in court documents, one of her supervisors said Chiang probably would not have failed the polygraph had it been administered by an examiner experienced in conducting National Security Division exams. Agent Daniel K. Sayner went on to note, “I believe that Chiang was discriminated against because of her ethnicity.”

Polygraphy is voodoo science regardless of who conducts administers the procedure. As the National Academy of Sciences more diplomatically put it, “[polygraph testing's] accuracy in distinguishing actual or potential security violators from innocent test takers is insufficient to justify reliance on its use in employee security screening in federal agencies.”

According to court records and the FBI inspector general’s report, it appears FBI officials in Washington feared that Chiang might be providing information to Leung, the suspected spy.

The inspector general’s report released in May 2006 said authorities believed Leung had a secret contact in the China Squad. Suspicions about Leung, who earned $1.7 million as an informant, surfaced as far back as 1987, five years after Smith became her handler. Concerns about Leung’s loyalty continued for more than a decade.

For reasons not explained in the report, 14 years after the first red flag went up, the FBI finally began investigating Leung. A “special squad” from the Los Angeles office led the investigation, and each member was required to pass a polygraph test.

Chiang believed she had been tapped for a role in the investigation because she was asked in August 2001 to take a polygraph examination. A 2003 affidavit by Agent John J. Quattrocki, then head of counterintelligence programs for the National Security Council, suggests that the FBI had no reason to believe Chiang would have “a problematic polygraph.” Quattrocki called her “a very good agent” who “would be the best person to conduct the investigation.”

But she apparently failed the polygraph, and FBI officials began investigating her too. Quattrocki and Sayner said in affidavits that they expected Chiang would remain at work while under investigation. Quattrocki said he was “shocked” when Mueller ordered her suspended.

On Feb. 13, 2002, barely a month after Chiang’s suspension, FBI officials in Los Angeles recommended that she be immediately reinstated, her attorney, Marvin L. Rudnick, said. The attorney said the recommendation turned up in a classified report Chiang found in her personnel file, which she obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.

But it was an additional nine months before she was reinstated.

Rudnick charged that Mueller invoked national security in Chiang’s case to protect the FBI from liability.

“Mueller used national security to hide behind a discriminatory action. A mistake was made he knew the FBI would pay for, and the only way he could get immunity was by saying it was a national security matter,” Rudnick said.

Sayner, who supervised Chiang, said in his statement, “I cannot understand why the bureau treats people the way Chiang was treated when the bureau has a need for a specific expertise.”

There was a final irony that troubled Chiang: Smith and Leung got off relatively easy, though they compromised national security.

Leung pleaded guilty to lying about the affair and filing a false income tax return. She was fined $10,000 and put on three years’ probation. She had been charged with illegally copying and possessing classified documents, but the case was dismissed because of prosecutorial misconduct. Leung spent three months in jail after her arrest on this charge.

In 2005, Smith also pleaded guilty to lying about his affair with Leung and was sentenced to three months’ house arrest and three years’ probation and fined $10,000.

“Smith got three months’ house arrest. I spent 10 months at home with restrictions,” Chiang said. “Smith went on with his life. My life and career were ruined.”

It’s time for the FBI to wake up to the fact that polygraph “testing” is a pseudoscientific sham.

6 Comments

  1. The use of polygraph exams as part of the hiring process in the national security area is a genuine threat to U.S. national security. Aldrich Ames passed two polygraph exams while he was spying for the Soviet Union — his actions led to the executions by the Soviets of numerous individuals supplying information to the U.S. intelligence community. The late CIA Director William Casey prided himself on his ability to lie while being polygraphed. Polygraph exams tests are inherently unreliable — which in part explains why the results of polygraph exams are inadmissible as evidence in court. In fact, polygraph exams lull organizations into a false sense of security. Sociopaths and psyhopaths can easily pass polygraph exams. The polygraph merely measures stress — thus persons concerned about finding a job, are offended by the questions (such as having their honesty or patriotism challenged,” and people who are not superficial in their responses may not pass the exam. Studies indicate that the average person tells 4 lies DAILY. So be careful about telling your mother what you thought about dinner or your reaction to your supervisor’s letter to the editor. If we polygraphed our politicians as a requirement to holding public office, we indeed would have a problem.

    • The use of polygraph exams as an indication of lying is complete BS and unreliable. This has been proven time and time again yet the FBI still convinces itself that it is a reliable source of character. I personally have “failed” a polygraph exam when I had no reason to lie and was telling the truth. They think they have it down to an “art”, but I can just tell you from first hand experience, it’s a bunch of BS and the FBI and CIA are missing out on otherwise qualified people if they continue to rely on this witch-doctor method of polygraphy.

  2. I have not finished reading the entire article (which I will), but I just want to note that it is extremely phony and hypocritical for agencies such as the FBI to fight against the presumed chinese intelligence, yet while, on the other hand, see the US continuing to ship 1000′s and 1000′s of jobs and entire industrial plants to China, and think everything is fine and dandy.
    Also, what is is with the US-INS that, on one hand, takes innocents immigrants through hell in the process of screening them and making sure they are not communits before they are approved as ‘safe’ alien residents, yet while, literally this country’s livelihood is being handed over to that same ‘hostile’ political system? …knowing that it’s doing so, to the very communist country it’s warning is an Enemy to the this Nation and it’s future. How about the trillions of $’s that it allowed itself to owe to a communist country such as China??! I mean, are we hypocritical, stupid, dishonest or all of the 3?!?! Any stupid person would agree that when a country ships jobs to an apponent one, they are not shipping just jobs, but anything that allows the sustenance of those jobs abroad including the trade secrets. Borrowing money from them automatically renders this country weak, and on several levels. Is this country stupid or is it simply corrupt?!?!?
    Please have the honesty not to delete this post. Citizens of this Country need to read it. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>