Passed the mandatory maintanance exam

[Poly-Killer]

Hey Poly-Killer, why don't you and Okieboy and the rest of the perverts on this site start your own website.  You guys make me sick.

Fed-up,

I suggest you gather a little information before making statements or casting your arbitrary judgments based a comment or question I have posted. I have NEVER participated in, condoned, or even considered child molestation or anything remotely related. Frankly it IS very disturbing to me. Maybe you should read my initial post. I AM A POLICE OFFICER and have been for several years. I was inquiring to okieboy for my own personal research(as if it is any of your business).

Regards,
PK

[Amused]

And what  is your "research"?  Sounds like you have your mind made up.  Makes me wonder what the average IQ is on this site.  And I do think that Fed-up had a point about you and "okieboy" being very friendly.  But perhaps you are just working undercover and trying to get the goods on the ole okie.

[orolan]

Amused,
I say again, what is your position on the polygraph? Poly-killer is simply one of the many LEO's out there who oppose polygraphs. Does that cause a problem for you? And I don't know what the average IQ is on this site, but I'm sure it dropped a few points now that you have graced us with your presence.

[Poly-Killer]

And what  is your "research"?  Sounds like you have your mind made up.  Makes me wonder what the average IQ is on this site.  And I do think that Fed-up had a point about you and "okieboy" being very friendly.  But perhaps you are just working undercover and trying to get the goods on the ole okie.

Amused,

Not that I feel the need to answer to someone who appears to be somewhat "cerebrally challenged", but since I have nothing better to do, and a few minutes to kill, I will.

First, my PERSONAL research is in the area of deception as a whole, including behavior, forensic aspects, etc.

Second, you're right, my mind is made up, but only after personal experience and investigations. Unlike you, who seem to simply spew for the sake of posting.

As far as my IQ, judging by the limited wisdom you have displayed, it's much higher than yours. As far as my question to okieboy, maybe you should read it again, it was cordial and straight-forward. It was not "friendly" and it was not in any way in support of what he or anyone else in that thread, or similar threads, has been convicted of or continue to participate in. If they have problems, they need help, period.

Please, in the future, if you are going to address someone or make accusations, present a valid argument or point. Stop with the senseless dribble. It is the likes of people like you that lower the average IQ on this site.

Regards,
PK

[Verbatim]

It's once again polygraph time.  Updates.  I am now placed in a weird situation.  On my last polygraph, the examiner ran the polygraph twice.  This is not normal.  After the second time he stopped the machine and asked me if what I knew about counter measures.  I told him exactly what I knew.  I felt that there was no reason to hide the fact that I knew what they were and that I could employ them at will.  He didn't say anything more, he simply ran the test one more time.  After running the test, he told me I could go without saying whether I "passed" or "failed".  I assumed that this meant that I passed because he did not ask any more specific questions or ask for a confession.  When the polygraph results were reviewed later, they showed no deception.  I find this interesting.  The examiner, knowing that I could employ countermeasures, made no mention (that I'm aware of) to the treatment provider or probation office about my ability to fool the test.  I am inclined to believe that the examiner doesn't want to draw attention to the fact the polygraph can indeed be beaten.  Interesting.

[The Shadow]

Verbatim,

I am inclined to believe that the examiner doesn't want to draw attention to the fact the polygraph can indeed be beaten.  Interesting.

[glb]Interesting indeed [/glb]