CLASSIC EXAMPLE!!

[Skeptic3]

and if you did ask to see your charts what would you have seen?? The reason for your deception is that you probably read the lame advice offered on this site and attepted to try it.
I am curious as to what dept and when you were tested . If  that indeed really even occured.

[Fair Chance]

"nolie4u, skeptic7, and skeptic 3":

All one person possibly?  I have heard of people having split personalities but this is getting ridiculous!  
Is this the same way that polygraph exams go?  The examiner has the answers before the test even begins?   George M. and the cult must be getting your goat or you would not go to these extremes.

[Skeptic]

"nolie4u, skeptic7, and skeptic 3":

All one person possibly?  I have heard of people having split personalities but this is getting ridiculous!  
Is this the same way that polygraph exams go?  The examiner has the answers before the test even begins?   George M. and the cult must be getting your goat or you would not go to these extremes.

Wow -- I thought I was the only Skeptic around here.

Well, you know what they say about imitation and flattery

Skeptic

[propolyGrl]

Wrong again. Before speaking first know what you are talking about. I guess I cant blame you. Your delusional like most people on here.

[polylawguy]

Can't you do any better than that George. You are getting very boring. At least change it up a bit

[Fair Chance]

Wrong again. Before speaking first know what you are talking about. I guess I cant blame you. Your delusional like most people on here.

"Wrong again."  About what:  refer to a quote or at least let the rest of the readers know what you are talking about.

"Before speaking first know what you are talking about."  What are we talking about (who, what, where, when)?

"I guess I cant blame you."  Who is "you" and what is to be blamed about?

"Your delusional like most people on here."  Trying to get the facts out of this posting would make any person trying to read it "delusional."

PropolyGirl, I have been corrected by Polyman2002 for my grammatical mistakes.  I thought that the discussion was at least going in a positive direction compared to your unsupported conclusions.  This website is uncensored and your ideas are welcome.

You have to present them first in a clear and coherent manner.  These types of rantings do not reinforce to any reader that you are intelligent and your arguments are based on sound facts or logical opinions.