FL Polygraph Examiner Denny Connor & Mike Alaiwait Background?

Started by MARY PRICE, May 28, 2017, 07:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Joe McCarthy

I respectfully disagree, as usual, you don't like my answer.  That does not mean I didn't answer your question.  In fact, my answer benefits you on this if you would just read it.

I swear to god, you're like Dallas County Probations administrators.   You don't like the end result, but fail to read the damn reports to see the benefit. You're just not as bright as you play off as. 

Anyway, I'll take you dogging your question, that you're backing out like ya did last year. 

I keep handing you golden opportunities, and you keep stepping on them.  This is one of the reasons you will never be elected as APA president.  You don't know when to get out of your own way.   

UGH, I have a better chance of winning that elections, and I am not even a member
Joe


Joe McCarthy

Joe

Dan Mangan


Quote from: the_fighting_irish on May 31, 2017, 10:11 PMI respectfully disagree, as usual, you don't like my answer.

But you failed to answer the question, Honest Joe.

How accurate is a run-of-the-mill PCSOT "test"?

Once you claim the percentage, cite the evidence.

Oh wait, there is none.

The "test" is bullshit.

Ex Member

Interesting, so they could not even use Statement Validity Analysis, Reality Monitoring or even looking for verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. But then again what do you expect from a state with a senator with a bad haircut who thinks she's Pocahontas.

Joe McCarthy

Dan, BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE, if you can't read that I'll get a tac hammer

I am going between you and the APA's numbers, and NAS

And my honesty and integrity is not subject to your narrative.  And we want to talk about shams, lets talk about your 100% number.  Where did you get that number Dan; the Book Of Mormon?  Or did ya visit the Scientology center on Beacon Hill?  lmao
Joe

Joe McCarthy

Quote from: Arkhangelsk on May 31, 2017, 10:19 PMInteresting, so they could not even use Statement Validity Analysis, Reality Monitoring or even looking for verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. But then again what do you expect from a state with a senator with a bad haircut who thinks she's Pocahontas.

ha! pocahontas
Joe

Dan Mangan

Quote from: Arkhangelsk on May 31, 2017, 10:19 PMInteresting, so they could not even use Statement Validity Analysis, Reality Monitoring or even looking for verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. But then again what do you expect from a state with a senator with a bad haircut who thinks she's Pocahontas.

Ark, I'm a born and bred Masshole. In this case, I agree with the Commonwealth.

At least for once, they got something right.

Such a "test" is a sham -- regardless of its form factor.

Joe McCarthy

Dan, you might be a lace curtain Irish, but don't insult my kind by being a pretender
Joe

Joe McCarthy

I wish you luck in your "campaign."  You don't stand a snowballs chance in hell.  I have a better chance of winning TAPE's examiner of the year award than you have of winning. 

Frankly, until to start showing up to meetings, and treating others with some level of respect, you couldn't win an election to be the APA package boy.

Dan, you're going about things wrong.  But go ahead, keep doing what you're doing.  Takes the heat off me for a few months a year 
Joe

Dan Mangan

Alas, Honest Joe, it is you who is the pretender.

You pretend the "test" is scientifically legitimate.

It is not.

Joe McCarthy

I don't pre tent the test is legitimate, I bet my life on it three different times.  I count on it.

having said that

You really need to learn how to get out of your own way.  You will never win any elections like this. 

But like I said, keep wasting your time, every time you do, it benefits me. 

Oh and when you back out of opportunities like you do, you turn your back on the future, just like the APA does when they don't listen.  Hey, you have something in common, both you are the APA have the same goals, impotence
Joe

Joe McCarthy

#42
Good luck on your campaign 

Now, I have to turn my back on you..

Good luck
Joe

Dan Mangan

Honest Joe professes to be a true polygraph "test" believer.

Honest Joe is not part of the solution.

Honest Joe is part of the problem.

Capiche?

Joe McCarthy

Whatever helps you sleep at night Dan.

I wonder if you even know what you really want.  Because it seems to me, you want to belong, you want to be a polygraph examiner, but not if you're not king of the hill. 

You say you're committed to the betterment of polygraph.  You're only committed to its destruction. 

One of my new goals, is to have a bigger impact making polygraph better, for both examiners and examinees, than you will ever achieve in attempting destroying it.

You're throwing away what is left of your future.  The APA is going to chew you up and spit you back out, you are neither hot or cold.

What a waste of a perfectly good membership. 

good luck in your future endeavors 

Joe

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview