American Polygraph Assocation 2016 Race for President-Elect: A challenge to my opponent, APA Director Jamie McCloughan

Started by Dan Mangan, Jun 09, 2016, 04:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Dan Mangan

lieguy8,

As we used to say in the army, you're a bold motherfucker.

Too bold, in this case.

ATTENTION: I'll pay $1,000 to the first person who conclusively identifies lieguy8.

I can do check, money order, PayPal, electronic transfer, or even arrange a cash hand-off at Caberet Royale in Dallas.

If anyone has any information regarding the identity of lieguy8, please call me directly at 603-801-5179.

Sign me,
Dedicated to Truth


Joe MCcarthy

I have a better idea.

Out and about right now, but then they probably know that. When I get home, I am.upping the ante.

No one will like it, but what's good for the goose

Dan Mangan

Let's get things back on track...

If my opponent for APA president elect -- APA Director Jamie McCloughan -- refuses to debate the issues with me, he should withdraw from the race.

Mr. McCloughan, are you, or are you not, dedicated to truth?

Joe McCarthy

Joe

Dan Mangan

Yesterday I again emailed my opponent for the office of APA president elect -- APA director Jamie McCloughan -- and asked him point-blank why he won't debate the issues with me.

Mr. McCloughan has yet to respond.

I hope the "dedicated to truth" APA electorate will take note of this continued stonewalling.

Dan Mangan

The American Polygraph Association 2016 electronic elections -- scheduled to start July 3rd at 0001 hours DST and run through 2359 hours DST on July 9th -- have hit a snag: the independent hosting web site is mysteriously down.

There was a similar false start last year, yet the vendor -- Votenet, based in Arlington VA -- was retained.

Given that we are in the midst of a holiday weekend, speedy resolution would seem rather unlikely.

Is this latest foul-up a mere coincidence, I wonder?



Dan Mangan

There were 2,472 eligible voters, though it appears that less than 500 APA members actually cast a ballot.

In the race for president elect, McCloughan received 339 votes (75%); I received 116 votes (25%).

Unlike last year, I did no active campaigning (as through email to APA members, for example), other than to post election related topics on a couple of forums.

By the way, APA examiner membership is made up of 1,239 law enforcement examiners, 1,065 private examiners, and 413 government examiners.


Ex Member

Dan is it possible for you to find out the members who did not vote? I think all you need to do is write a couple hundred personal letters to them.

Dan Mangan

Ark, I likely would have won in a landslide if I sent refrigerator magnets bearing the slogan TRUST YOUR CHARTS to a thousand APA members.

But irrespective of the message, there's a logistical problem: The APA does not make a complete member directory available to its membership.

There's a partial member directory on www.polygraph.org, but it's limited to those individuals who pro-actively registered on the site. Last time I looked, that on-line directory contained about 600 names. My hunch is that it's largely the same bunch that actually took the time to vote.

As for identifying the non-voters, all we know is that more than 80% of the APA membership didn't vote.



Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview