Polygraph Operator William McCallister Arrested for Sexual Assault

[William McCallister]

To: Bill Brown:

"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact."
― Arthur Conan Doyle, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

William McCallsiter

[William McCallister]

To: Bill Brown & Winter Haven PD

"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."
― Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes

George, thanks for allowing me to sound off on your website.

William McCallister

[William McCallister]

ATTENTION NEW YORK AREA!!!

I am seeking information regarding a physical and/or sexual child abuse case that occured in the New York Area. The victim is possibly two (2) years of age.   Possibly in the Astoria or Bellerose (Queens County) New York area. This information was developed from a family member. Between  1993 - 2005. The suspects are:

Husband & Wfe:
Zamela Balbhadr Jambard, Age 47
Seeram Matadial, age 43
The currently reside in Orlando, Florida.

Anyone with information, please respond to:

William L. McCallister
President
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
Winter Haven, FL 33880
863-299-9424
floridapolygraph@comcast.net

[Sandra]

I cant speak on William's behalf but I can tell you that I am a friend of his.  When I lived in Florida a few years ago there were a whole group of friends who I used to ride and hang out with almost every Thursday night and one day on the weekends.  William was one of them.  I never felt he was any different than the other men but I will say...he was always a gentleman.  He never hid who he was or anything about his past.  I NEVER saw him drop anything into anyone's drink and I NEVER saw him do anything inappropriate. He was always kind and always willing to help his friends.  The picture you are painting of him here is horrible.  If you did do something wrong William than shame on you!!  but....I don't believe you did nor do I believe you would ever do any harm to anyone.  Maybe the rest of you need to spend some time with the man before you judge him.  He has a heart of gold and I will always consider him to be a great friend.  And.....NO...we never had any relationship more than friends in case any of you are interested.  Good luck to you William...please don't forget you do have friends and we all love ya!!  Keep your chin up and don't worry what people say....you know the truth.  "The truth will set you free".   

[abusedbygov]

Interesting to see Mr. McCallister squirming like a snail in salt. However, sir, you did accept the plea bargain, therefore you must have done it, yes? I was forced into a similar situation, and accepted the lesser sentence on a false accusation. No one believes me, either, and now I must take "maintenance polygraphs" to insure the public is safe from the fiendish impulses of a degenerate sex offender. I've already seen a poly examiner lie about me capriciously on at least 2 occasions. You need to find a new occupation.

[Tampa Polygraph Examiner]

Now I understand whay several single young ladies (I tested in my Tampa office)  thought it was strange that you were willing to drive over a hundred miles and give them housecalls without asking for any prepayment!!!   

Reminds me of an episode of To Catch A Predator....you are going away fro a long time you weasel....For you to continue being a Polygraph Examiner would be as dangerous as a pedofile opreating a child care facility.

[Bill_Brown]

abusedbygov,

You described your crime in an earlier post and admitted to it.  Your plea bargain was to escape incarceration and it was based on your admissions and actions.  Mr. McCallister also admitted to his previous conviction and has not hidden it from "Sandra", according to her post in support of him.  That was also a valid conviction for which he served time.  Is he guilty of the current allegations?  Only he and the ones accusing him know for sure.  We will find out when there is a trial or plea bargain, and I am willing to accept the judgment of the court or his admission at a plea bargain.  I believe things look very bad for him at this time, however, I'm not privy to all of the facts in his current case.  I cannot make a judgment based on the information I currently am aware of. 

[stefano]

For you to continue being a Polygraph Examiner would be as dangerous as a pedofile opreating a child care facility. 

Somehow, I don't think I would feel much better having you opreating the instrument.

[WilliamMcCallister]

To: Tampa Polygraph Examiner

Why don't you give your name??? You must be one of the many poorly trained and incompetent examiners operating throughout the State of Florida.  People use my service because of my knowledge, skills and experience. It is one thing to make an accusation, but another to prove it. 

There is an examiner, you know who you are, that I sued back in 1986 for being incompetent.  I suspect this comment came from you. As much as it pains me to say this...the AntiPolygraph community is understandably right about their complaints with the polygraph profession.  I have been on both sides, therefore, I have first hand knowledge.  It is easy to make a rush to judgement, so until you have all the case facts and information regarding a specific allegation or situation, it is best to be reserved.

William McCallister

[abusedbygov]

You described your crime in an earlier post and admitted to it.Your plea bargain was to escape incarceration and it was based on your admissions and actions.

Huh? What? I don't know what you're smokin, kid, but it must be really good. You got the wrong info. I didn't "admit" to anything on this website, because I didn't do anything. I didn't escape incarceration my friend, I was a guest of the lovely government for quite a few years. If I had not pled guilty, I could have gotten many many many more years, for nothing. The only thing I recall "admitting" to was that the system is set up in such a way as to virtually insure a guilty verdict, should one choose to go to trial.

[Bill_Brown]

Abusedbygov,

This was your second post on this board.  I don't know your true age and I am sure you do not know my true age.  Thanks for the compliment "what are you smoking Kid". 

Oh yes indeedy, my perspicacious friend. Only, in my case, it went a whole lot deeper. It was the owner of perverted-justice.com, NOT a cop, just a wild-eyed fanatical Jesus loving GAWD fearing jizzbone. I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, and THEY knew I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, yet they tracked me down and boom! That was it.

My reading of your post indicates a sexual conversation with a person posing as a 13 year old, that was a crime and you were convicted by plea bargain, which means you admitted to the allegations and charges.  You served your time and I do hope you moved on in your life and no longer speak with persons posing as 13 years olds, regardless of their true age. 

Best of luck to you in your future endeavors 

[abusedbygov]

Oh yes indeedy, my perspicacious friend. Only, in my case, it went a whole lot deeper. It was the owner of perverted-justice.com, NOT a cop, just a wild-eyed fanatical Jesus loving GAWD fearing jizzbone. I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, and THEY knew I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, yet they tracked me down and boom! That was it.

My reading of your post indicates a sexual conversation with a person posing as a 13 year old, that was a crime 

Ahh, yes, now I see. It all becomes clear. My "admission" was there was a conversation with an adult posing as a 13 yr old. You consider this some sort of a crime. Hmm. What if I told you my real age was.....12? You discussed sex!! Oh My God!! You've committed a crime! Oh Puhleeze. I don't know how old you are, but grow up.

[Bill_Brown]

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 117 > § 2422
§ 2422. COERCION AND ENTICEMENT
(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.

abusedbygov,

A plea is a person's formal response to a criminal charge.  If you enter a guilty plea, it means that you admit you committed the crime with which you've been charged.  The judge then asks "Are you pleading guilty because in fact you are guilty?" or words to that effect.  You must answer; "Yes", or the guilty plea is not accepted by the court and a trial is set. 

  I didn't make the laws.   There are appellate court decisions that allow conviction when any party is posing as a 13 year old and you are an adult.  Just for the record, I am considered a "Senior" by my younger associates. 

[stefano]

Bill,

Where in this language does it allow for prosecution if there was no real victim? Most 13 year olds have the common sense to not run off and meet a stranger; those that would, are on the edge of the Bell Curve and would most likely fall victim to any nefarious scenario. All the drama about sex crimes aside, this seems to cross the line into entrapment.

[Bill_Brown]

In the statute it does not address the issue of an adult posing as a child.  The appellate courts upheld convictions on cases where adults posed as young children and the individuals talking to them believed the adult was a child. 

"persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual" to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so"

I believe that is the part of the statute used in the decisions.  The Supreme Court has also upheld the appellate court decisions.  The courts have held that this is not entrapment.  There are several organizations, one mentioned by abusedbygov that goes after these cases. 

The court decisions have allowed this practice and do not find it to be entrapment.  The persons posing as underage children do not encourage the person they are talking with to violate any laws.  All conversations are saved on the computer for use in court with no omissions of wording.