Mr. Mascke's Act of Treason

Started by skip.webb, Apr 18, 2008, 10:39 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Alpha11

      T.M.,

 Honestly, you are all over this board and your obsession oozes out to where even the occasional reader on this board would assume that it may have in fact been your psychological, rather than your polygraph, which kept you from obtaining your goals.  Plain and Simple, you just may have not measured up above and beyond your polygraph as in what you write is so negative and vile that I wonder how you get through the day.  Maybe your better off as an Amway distributor or something, rather than bringing your crap attitudes into government.  Tone it down, take a Dale Carnegie course, and maybe go out and find a job which can live with YOU !!!  I don't know what that job is, but it's not in an environment where others need to stay positive and focussed like the Feds as an Intelligence type.  What other professions have you considered or applied for ?  Your perpetutation of your claimed victimization is getting thin, as you have NOT moved on and are still obsessing here.  Spare US !!!! Your about as depressing to read as a bill from a funeral parlor salesman.

Alpha 11 / New Mexico

BarneyH

     Lethe,

  You fail to recognized the obvious !!!  G.M. is a former career Intel Officer of 20 years, and knowingly tried to undermine & interfere with the chain of command structure in a time of war.  Opinions aside, he tried to tell our troops not to trust their superiors in the equipment they were given.  We have a democracy which places those Officers over those men, as he well knows, and in trying to undermine that no matter what the issue, is sedition which is a close cousin to treason.  He gets what he gets; either from authorities overtly, or otherwise as it all unfolds.  I doubt even you in expression of your opinions here would have crossed that line as he did, especially if you were a vet who had served in a war zone.  Don't confuse debating a point to death with real world consequences which must be accounted for; and there will be an accounting I think for all extremists.

Sergeant1107

How exactly is it treason for a person to warn the troops not to rely on an unreliable detector of deception?

Do you honestly believe that if this web site did not exist then no one on the planet would have access to information on countermeasures?  That's ridiculous.

All George did was point on that the troops should not rely on something that is inaccurate to begin with, and that can also be easily defeated or confounded by anyone with access to either the internet or a public library.

Would it be better for the troops to use the port-a-poly and believe that anyone who passes must be innocent of any terrorist activities?  Is that helping the troops?
Lorsque vous utilisez un argumentum ad hominem, tout le monde sait que vous êtes intellectuellement faillite.

notguilty1

Quote from: Alpha11 on Jun 08, 2008, 01:32 AMT.M.,

 Honestly, you are all over this board and your obsession oozes out to where even the occasional reader on this board would assume that it may have in fact been your psychological, rather than your polygraph, which kept you from obtaining your goals.  Plain and Simple, you just may have not measured up above and beyond your polygraph as in what you write is so negative and vile that I wonder how you get through the day.  Maybe your better off as an Amway distributor or something, rather than bringing your crap attitudes into government.  Tone it down, take a Dale Carnegie course, and maybe go out and find a job which can live with YOU !!!  I don't know what that job is, but it's not in an environment where others need to stay positive and focussed like the Feds as an Intelligence type.  What other professions have you considered or applied for ?  Your perpetutation of your claimed victimization is getting thin, as you have NOT moved on and are still obsessing here.  Spare US !!!! Your about as depressing to read as a bill from a funeral parlor salesman.

Alpha 11 / New Mexico

It's funny how someone can come on here and trash TM Cullen while not participating in any constrctive way.
Mr. Cullen is passionate about his Polygraph experience as am I and many others. This is about shining a light on an in accurate and un- scientific process that is illegal in for most applications and has somehow survived in fed employment and criminal investigations (though in the later it holds little to no weight) ultimatly labeling people as liers when they may not be.
I don't think this is whinning but a fight that people like us that have been wrongfully labeled need to fight.
We must be on to something because this site is VERY successfull and there are many examiners that make it their business to come here daily to try to shore up thier scam and income from it.
I am sure that Mr. Cullen has moved on profesionally and has a rewarding job in spite of his false positive. I am sure his involvement here is to further education to those that seek the truth in the Polygraph lie.

T.M. Cullen

#34
Not guilty,

Probably just another polygrapher who doesn't like hearing the truth, and, as you said, with nothing constructive to contribute, or anything substantive to respond with.

So he posts a personal attack.  We see this here all the time.

As for moving on.  I am now in the lingerie business.  You now panties, thongs...etc.  It has been very lucrative for me.  Last week alone I pulled down about 2000!

TC
"There is no direct and unequivocal connection between lying and these physiological states of arousal...(referring to polygraph)."

Dr. Phil Zimbardo, Phd, Standford University

notguilty1

Quote from: Alpha11 on Jun 08, 2008, 03:19 PMNot guilty,

Probably just another polygrapher who doesn't like hearing the truth, and, as you said, with nothing constructive to contribute, or anything substantive to respond with.

So he posts a personal attack.  We see this here all the time.

As for moving on.  I am now in the lingerie business.  You now panties, thongs...etc.  It has been very lucrative for me.  Last week alone I pulled down about 2000!
TC

Hey TC, Glad to hear it and I will assume you don't need to go on an anti-pantie site to defend your livelyhood LOL ;D ;D ;D ;D




Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview