question

[EJohnson]

Cliff, I know what I am talking about alright.

Perhaps it's time to retire Al's persona mate. You have shown your literary prowess with him enough. The only thing you didn't count on is that no American from the intel biz would use such a name-----we Americans aren't so ironical----at least not as much as the Anglo-Africans.

The only exception being the American band "The Dead Kennedy's"---but they were a punk band, not former rank and file patriotic intel workers.

[T.M. Cullen]

Ejohnson,

How does it make you feel that Ames spied his ass off yet passed all his polygraphs with flying colors?  Yet you still defend the test.

A little old fashion detective work would have caught him sooner, but, hey, the man passed his polygraphs, so they probably figured he was an okay guy.

Do you still believe in the test?  Tell the truth.  We are sick of your lies and arrogance.  Come clean!

Just because you draw a pay check by engaging in this con game is no excuse!

[EJohnson]

I don't draw a paycheck from polygraph at all.

No lies.

No arrogance.

Just plain ol' horse sense.

I don't have to "believe in the test" like it is some form of religion. Polygraph does quite well with or without the belief of both it's detractors and it's boosters. In peer-reviewed studies, the polygraph does very well in detecting lies, and even more so in detecting hidden knowledge. Your statements over the last couple of weeks regarding "belief in" polygraph suggest serious mental disorder.

I honestly don't care about turncoats and espionage-----any more than the average citizen. All of your ranting about a super-spy being able to beat polygraph tests is nothing new-------such legends have abounded for decades---that is, super-polygraph-beating-monsters. You seem to be very excited over this concept. Write a congressman, do some jogging----whatever. Just please know that to continue a repetetive rant such as yours is .....well......a few pancakes short of a stack.

[T.M. Cullen]

Mister Johnson,

I can tell you from experience, because I lie on test and passing the test.
Mr. Ames, he pass test, but he lying!

I think you lie.  You no polygrapher?  Prove it!

You no can prove, then you must be liar!

Larry

[EJohnson]

Now you are being racist against Asians eh? Nice.

Have you done any more side jobs for foreign agencies? Nothing like maken a lil extra lettuce for a rainy day, eh?

[T.M. Cullen]

Mr. Johnson,

You're pattern of posting on this board indicates that you are a polygrapher.  Probably from Canada.  

Yet you continue to lie!

Can you prove otherwise?

We want to help you, but we can't if you continue to withhold information.  Come clean and we can get through this together.

As it stands now, though, you are showing a "pattern of deception".

[sackett]

Larry,

just to prove I'm not as thin skinned as some have suggested, I'm not going to address your personal attack on me.  I would request, though, you find something a little more original to use as your ammunition.

Do you actually have something to say, or are you just yelling to get it off your chest?

Please advise,

Sackett

P.S.  Did you actually author both of the preceding "Larry" posts?

[T.M. Cullen]

Do you actually have something to say, or are you just yelling to get it off your chest?


Yes, your pattern of posting on this board indicates deception.

You seem not to want to answer my question.  Why are you holding back the truth?  Persistent refusal to answer a simple question is a sign of "deception".

Of course, you are under no obligation to answer.  

Have you ever falsely accused somebody you tested of being untruthful?

just to prove I'm not as thin skinned as some have suggested, I'm not going to address your personal attack on me.

No you just go crying to george because I called you a name.  Which is your right, of course.  Sorry!

Larry

[sackett]

Larry,

please name one thing I have been deceptive about!  I do not mean your perception of lying based on your fanatical quest to misrepresent the truth; but, just one thing that we can all agree with, by evidence on this board, that I have purposefully misled, withheld or lied about.  That is, if you can handle a simple request from an examiner?

Furthermore, when did I go and whine to George?  I can handle my own battles.  I simply believe it is unfair to have a battle of the wits with an unarmed man.  YOU, being "that man...Cuz, It seems that it is YOU, not I, who are one conducting the

                         "POOR ME - PITY PARTY."

You are exactly the personality type that should be excluded from law enforcement and/or government service. Or, as they say in some circles, "you got issues, bro!"

Sackett

[LALE]

I believe the bigger picture is that APA members/examiners should follow rules and guidelines of the APA to retain their membership in this association.  

The APA doesn't even kick out members who falsify their credentials.  I wouldn't hold  your breath.

How do you know this? The APA Board of Directors are supposed to handle matters of non-third party victim discipline with secrecy, very much like employers do. With some exceptions, I doubt you care to have your law enforcement disciplinary actions put on Front Street. You continue to speak of which you don't know.

So then, name just one.