New here and I need some help desperately.

[1904]

Why dont you push your case - tell the potential employer that the examiner said
"he's not going to recommend you etc" and is he a God?
Does the examiner hold the sword of Damocles?
Does their recruitment process turn only on the p/g examination?
Tell them that an Incon means, in your opinion, that he couldnt do his job
properly - ie he may be insufficiently skilled, regardless of how may examinations
he may have done or claimed to have done.

He sounds like a nerf to me.

Tell them you want a retest.
Practise that breathing CM
Visualise the pitbull coming to savage you immed you recognise a Control Q and
breathe shorter and more rapid cycles. If you can extend yourself to multitasking,
then gradulally and slightly - tighten your sphincter and hold it for several seconds.

Breathe slower (dont stop though) and deeper as you recognise the Relevant Q
and breathe deeper slower deeper cycles.

Do it  and you've got a pass result weedboy.

[Lonesome00]

I am pushing my case. I just got off the phone with a major from the department. She said will see if the chief will interview me one not. But apparently, they rely heavily on that infernal box. Hopefully, they will see who I am and not, what the lies of that machine claims I am.

[1904]

Well, good Luck in your endeavours. State your case assertively.
Tell them you are not at all satisfied with the polygraphers attitude
and report; that it is within your knowledge that p/g examiners usually
go the 'subject is practising CM's' route when they get Inc results.

If he asks how do you know that - tell him you were upset and undertook
some research on the internet and were disturbed to find so many
complaining about the very same thing - being accused of practising CM's
when all they did was to try and "BREATHE NORMALLY" as instructed by
the examiner.

You complied with all of his instructions and were extremely dismayed when
he turned around and said that you must have practised CM's because the
result was an Incl.

FACT: approximately a third of all PG examinations result in Inconclusive's
simply because the process is NOT scientific and it IS FLAWED. Any examiner
denying the above needs to get his head out of his a-h.

[Lonesome00]

Well, I got a call back and they are going ahead with psych eval. But I am still getting a negative respons with my final interview with the old man. I am still in the game, but I am hanging on to a fine thread.

[1904]

Some of the psychometric protocols in use involve a line of inquiry to see how you
would respond to certain life situations and where your view of right vs wrong lies.

Try to imagine that you're a super hero do-gooder and that you want to help everyone
and do everything right -- put yourself in that frame of mind when you are with the
psycho-babbler. Imagine that you really really want to be a good guy and in that frame
of mind - you then respond to their questions and situations.

You'll get through it. Tell yourself you will. go there with the attitude that you will
get through it and you will get that job. Be positive. Show your positivity. let them
see positive, nice young man oozing out of you. Now go and get that job.

[Lonesome00]

I'm not all that worried about the that part. I still have reason for concern about box.That will weigh heavily

[1904]

Well, I got a call back and they are going ahead with psych eval. But I am still getting a negative respons with my final interview with the old man. I am still in the game, but I am hanging on to a fine thread.

And, did you get the job???

[Lonesome00]

They said they will wait for the test results, then they might schedule an interview with the chief. I am still in the game, but barely.

If this one does not happen, the local university opened up a slot fot a police officer. I have already applied for it.