Failed poly impact other clearance?

[Wallerstein]

As is my intention.  I was totally truthful with CIA and would/will be with any future government agency.

Check out the article. It's worth the read especially for someone who used to work there.  Here's a snippet:

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200604/nsa-surveillance

[quickfix]

Wallerstein:
I would not be concerned with State Dept asking for another agency's poly charts.  It's virtually unheard of.  In 20+ years in the DOD poly community, I've never had interaction with State on poly matters of personnel of my agency.  Secondly, merely holding a TS clearance requires no poly, with the exception of a couple of agencies, including NSA and CIA.  Nomination for access to specifically designated special access programs does require successful completion of a CI-scope poly, where regulations so mandate.  Further, the SF86 requires no disclosure of a previous poly.  Where it asks whether you have ever been investigated for a clearance, the correct answer is yes if you have ever held a clearance or been put in for one;  it has nothing to do with polygraph.  The information contained in Item #26 of the form covers which agency conducted the check, when, and what level of clearance you were granted. Finally, be aware that a DOD poly (the fact that one was conducted, not the charts) entered into the DCII may be accessed by other federal investigative agencies, including, I would think, State.  If so, it may or may not be an issue with their security folks.  Hope this has been helpful.

[Wallerstein]

Quickfix,

So State will never request the poly charts, but the fact that I was unsuitable at CIA (not DoD) would register on the DCII or NAC could cause problems?  

For question  26 I have to put yes.  For clearance received I should put N/A right?

Thanks.

[quickfix]

Item 26, the answer is yes, the next box you put the code indicated for the agency that conducted your BI/SBI in connection with your clearance nominated (the codes are right above the box, DOD would be "1"), and the last box for type of clearance granted, you would enter "0" for clearance not required if never granted a clearance, or the appropriate code for whatever level you were last granted.  There are also instructions above the boxes for what to enter if you don't recall or if you're not sure.

Unless State Dept has their own poly program, which I doubt, there would be no need for requesting your charts, as they would need the polygraph software to download and open them in the poly program.  Even if they had a poly program, it is very unusual for a poly program to share charts with another program;  would have to be something very significant for that to happen, almost non-existant in the pre-employment/screening world.  Finally the DCII entries on poly only indicate that a poly was conducted, when, and whether it was favorable/unfavorable.

Regards

[Jeffery]

I was polygraphed (I'm a contractor) by a couple of assholes at an intel agency.  Inconclusive both times; then put in adjudication limbo for a year or so.

Eventually the contact at the intel agency asked for somebody else to be put on the contract since my clearance was taking too long.

I was never denied; simply withdrawn from processing.  I already held a DoD TS.

I'm assuming I answer "Yes I've been investigated" and put DoD and the date my TS was granted when it's time to renew, correct?  No need to advertise my run-in with the box and disdain for those who worship it.

Will this come up during a DoD clearance renewal?  

[quickfix]

Correct;  TS and date of last clearance;  there is no provision on the form to refer to any poly.  During your next PR, IF they check the DCII, they would see a poly for an unresolved exam, nothing more;  I don't think it would be an issue just for a PR.

P.S.  I might have been one of those assholes.  I'm a DOD examiner.  I almost fell out of my chair laughing, just think, an asshole examiner helping an examinee!!! What's this world coming too?!?  Anyway, no offense taken, I've been called far worse, even by my own kind!

Regards

[Wallerstein]

Quickfix,

Your honesty and helpfulness are appreciated.  You say poly charts will not be shared--will CIA share any information with State about me garnered during poly--is this a matter of course?

[quickfix]

My best guess is no, unless State inquires as part of any application for an upgraded clearance, i.e. from TS to TS/SCI in connection with a new job or position.  I can't guarantee that, as I have not personally dealt with State, but it's been my experience in some 30 years of DOD service involving clearances, adjudications, and poly that your situation is not a big deal.  Good luck in your endeavors.

[Tennvol]

So will a CIA denial cause a flag on a DoD NAC check?  I was denied by the agency last year and have my re-investigation for my DoD secret due in 6 months. Should I worry?

[quickfix]

Shouldn't be a problem;  a NAC consists of checking with federal law enforcement databases for any outstanding warrants, arrest records, convictions, etc.  Going from Secret to TS is a more comprehensive process.

[George W. Maschke]

As is my intention.  I was totally truthful with CIA and would/will be with any future government agency.

Check out the article. It's worth the read especially for someone who used to work there.  Here's a snippet:

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200604/nsa-surveillance

This article, "Big Brother Is Listening" by James Bamford, is indeed a worthwhile read for anyone concerned with national security policy. For those who are not Atlantic Monthly subscribers, the full text is available here:

http://homepage.mac.com/imfalse/chapel_annex/big_brother_listening.html

[stupid failed poly]

So now that we know the answer for CIA vs DoD...what would be the impact on a CIA lifestyle poly failure for someone holding a DIA TS SCI?  I'm of course going to appeal since I really have no clue as to why I have  not passed and am waiting for my statement of reasons.  

I don't need the Lifestyle for my current position, but I want to have some reassurance that most likely I will not lose my current SCI access.  Any one have any experience in this?  Thanks.

[George W. Maschke]

stupid failed poly,

While I don't have firsthand knowledge, considering that DoD is DIA's parent agency, one would expect the general practice to be similar. On the other hand, it has been recently reported that DIA is greatly expanding its polygraph program, and it's conceivable that they've decided (against all evidence and reason) to put greater credence in polygraph chart readings.

[Stupid Failed Poly]

ok, so I got my letter back stating why I failed.  Apparently it was due to suitability.  I had a run in with something totally STUPID that looked like shoplifting recently, which was just a comedy/tragedy of bad decisions on my part.  I have never done anything like this in my life, but I was totally truthful about it during the interview after the poly (happend after I took the poly and even though I wasn't strapped in, again I was totally candid).  

So what should I do?  I mean I don't really know if I can appeal, because I was completely candid and the information that caused my denial is truth.  At the same time, I have a concern for losing my SCI access for something this dumb.  But because I wasn't denied for anything CI related, am I better off just letting the judgment stand (paperwork said I could reapply in a year) in hopes that DIA sees that I am no threat to their CI information?  I think I have maybe 2 weeks left before I have to submit my appeal.  

[BubbaJr]

Stupid Failed Poly,

What made you initially think you failed the poly?  In your first post, you seemed to have known that you had already failed.  Also, how long after your poly did it take to receive the letter stating why you failed?

Thanks!