Driving impaired

Started by Orion, Nov 22, 2001, 04:52 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Orion

IS the question, have you ever driven impaired, a control or relevant question?
Impaired, if not defined, would be wide open to interpretation (some would even say you are impaired after one drink) and therefor, a control.... however if impaired was defined in the pretest, it would become relevant.

Anyone agree?

Covert_1

any and all "terms" used in the test should be covered before the test.  Both the tester and the testee should agree on the term, otherwise the test is invalid.


George W. Maschke

#2
Covert 1,

You wrote in part:
QuoteBoth the tester and the testee should agree on the term, otherwise the test is invalid.

Note that although it is standard practice to review the questions to be asked during the "in-test" phase during the "pre-test" phase, whether or not the polygrapher conducts such a review, polygraph chart readings have no validity. For more on the scientific status of polygraphy, see Chapter 1 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector and the sources cited there. See also Professor William G. Iacono's recent article, "Forensic 'Lie Detection': Procedures Without Scientific Basis."

Orion,

As has been discussed elsewhere, a question about driving while under the influence of alcohol is almost certainly a probable-lie "control" question in the context of a pre-employment polygraph interrogation, although substantive admissions with regard to drunk driving might serve as grounds for disqualification.

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Signal Private Messenger: ap_org.01
SimpleX: click to contact me securely and anonymously
E-mail: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"

Covert_1

George,

Yes, I agree with the fact that the poly isn't worth a damn.  However, if the tester and you agree on a term, and he decides to change it during the test....the test "by rule" is invalidated.  So it is tossed.

I used that rule quite effectively when I on one of my many polys.  Immediately after the poly, I instructed the polygrapher that they had violated the rule...I then notified my Security Officer.  The test was tossed by Security and damn, the next available slot on the schedule was 6 months down the road.

Which never came...went another 2 1/2 years before I was scheduled for my regular test.


So they couldn't have had much faith in the test either.

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last name of the first U.S. president?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview