don't understand

[69]

I have read many of the reports, on this site, regarding pre-employment polys- more specifically fed government poly exams.  I am not an expert and do not wish to deliberate the effectiveness and reliability of the exam, but most of the stories of the exams, are untrue.

I doubt that most of the people that have posted stories have even taken an poly.  In fact, allowing these false postings only encourages people to want to buy literature on these so called countermeasures.

[George W. Maschke]

This message board is not censored. All points of view are welcome. If you have reason to believe that any post you've read is false, please feel free to post a rebuttal to it.

Note that AntiPolygraph.org's literature on polygraph countermeasures is free. See, The Lie Behind the Lie Detector.

[mike3358]

What facts do you have that prove "most" of the posts you spoke of are untrue?

[biggs]

I get the idea that the dubious poster is a pissed off polygrapher who is a sore loser.  I could be wrong though.

[Human Subject]

Or he's trying to bait people into revealing more details than they'd otherwise be comfortable doing in an attempt to validate their accounts.

I've taken multiple federal polygraph exams.  I described at least one on this board, though I held back on a few of the details.  The accounts of others I have read here all sound plausible given my experiences.

What specifically do you think makes the accounts you read here implausible?

[mike3358]

Since he/she can't back up with facts, I consider the post and the accusations therein, void.