TheNoLieGuy4U wrote on Feb 28^th, 2008 at 4:14am:


I have removed no references to Jack Trimarco from AntiPolygraph.org, nor have I made any false claims about him, nor has he threatened to sue me. AntiPolygraph.org did receive three specific allegations of serious misconduct against Mr. Trimarco that were duly investigated and found to be unsubstantiated. See Report of Investigation into Allegations Concerning John R. "Jack" Trimarco.

Quote:


I feel no sense of loss at having documented that the aforementioned allegations against Mr. Trimarco were unsubstantiated. I don't want anyone's reputation to be harmed by false allegations.

Where have I made any personal attack against Jack Trimarco? While I have criticized some of his public pronouncements regarding polygraphy (including, for example, comments made on the Bill O'Reilly Show, the Dr. Phil Show, and in a videotape made for the Department of Energy), and note that he erroneously found me deceptive on an FBI pre-employment polygraph examination (see my statement, "Too Hot of a Potato: A Citizen-Soldier's Encounter with the Polygraph"), my criticisms have been substantive, and not personal in nature. The only impropriety I have called attention to is his use of the FBI seal in marketing his polygraph services. (He has since modified his website, featuring the seal much less prominently.)

Although Jack Trimarco's erroneous polygraph results caused me long-term career harm, I don't hold him personally responsible, and I certainly don't hate him. During my FBI polygraph, his comportment was at all times proper, and while I have not had the opportunity to review my polygraph charts (the FBI claims it is unable to locate them), I have no reason to believe that he did anything that was inconsistent with his training as a polygraph examiner.

As for your suggestion that I am somehow disloyal to my country, see my Rebuttal of Defamatory Remarks by Polygraph Examiner Dr. Louis I. Rovner, Ph.D. My polygraph results notwithstanding, no one directed me to seek employment with the FBI. I never provided classified information to anyone unauthorized to receive it. I never had unauthorized contact with a representative of a foreign government. I never used or sold an illegal drug, nor did I withhold any important information from my FBI application.

I was honorably discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve after 20 years of active and reserve service. I have done all that my country has called upon me to do. I feel no need to further defend myself against charges of disloyalty from the likes of you.

T.M. Cullen wrote on Feb 28^th, 2008 at 6:45pm:



No, not liars, just perhaps quoting different research articles.   

Oh, I forgot, "THERE IS BUT ONE RESEARCH DOCUMENT AND ITS NAME IS NAS..."    --   4th Commandment of your movement...

Sackett

I never provided classified information to anyone unauthorized to receive it. I never had unauthorized contact with a representative of a foreign government. I never used or sold an illegal drug, nor did I withhold any important information from my FBI application.

Wait a minute buster !!  Were you, or were you Not an Intelligence Officer vs. an Infantry Officer ?  Did you or did not Not sign a secrecies act agreement ?  If so to both, then you ARE in a special and unique catagory compared to G.I. Joe in that whether or not the items you list are discoverable under the freedom of information act, YOU are not allowed, as a part of that oath and executed document, to assist ANY person in the means, methods, sources, or efforts of U.S. intelligence collection, and this may also extend to NATO nations as well of which Holland is one.  You are not John Q. Public and know this well.   

Further, are your efforts here to regarded as inconsistent with what your behavior would have been while inside government should you have been hired by LAPD or the FBI ?  Also, I have known many who have served in such places and quite frankly you seem a bit odd to me compared to them.  I will admit that as a PhD that you are probably a great researcher, and have organized this biased site at the level of a PhD. It begs the question though, are you not capable of doing anything "Constructive" with your life, or should we really believe that someone with a PhD simply in middle eastern languages should be taken more seriously than PhD's in the applied use of Psychophysiology ?  Why not save the world from the horrid Iranian regime George.  Your simple ability to talk to them though, as well as others, has not gotten us very far as those folks are NOT listening.  So how much good would your service have really done us anyway should you have been hired.  You are a fine writer, but in seeing you speak I don't believe you fit the image of what the FBI is trying to portray.  You have a fine education, but overall neither you or I were the cookie cutter mold from which they built agents who historically did well.  I think you are very well suited to be a researcher, if and when you do so in an unbiased way, but in this area you are toting too much personal baggage and in each and every day are mentally crippled into a mantra.  In the end, your stop at the polygraph shop was but one stop among many.  Thanks for applying, but you were owed nothing, and now provide nothing in any OTHER way to a country in the middle of a war with radical Islam.  This war IS being won without your help and assistance.  Just know that there is really very little satisfaction in being "Anti" anything in life, as the world remembers "Anti" people as usually scoundrals, and to those who are creators / inventors / practitioners; a thanks for a job well done.  Your not to old to change course, but you have wasted so much of your time and that of the public's.  They may be disgruntled and disappointed at not getting a job, but the sense of entitlement I read between the lines tells me how mentally weak this younger generation really is.  I only rebound from such thoughts in seeing those who do come into service and get the big picture.

I was indeed in the Military Intelligence branch, held a top secret clearance, and signed a classified information nondisclosure agreement that I have fully honored.

I noted a very short answer for a very big question.  You see George, You need to read the fine print in that classified nondisclosure agreement you signed.  It states that for up to a fifty year period, in most cases, or that in your case the Sec. of the Army's release / Sec. of Def. release; that you will NOT publish anything about the means, methods, or details of intelligence collection.  The fact you completed twenty years of service does not relieve you of that burden, and it is NOT limited to solely classified information YOU were exposed to.  While much of what you place on this site is obtained under the freedom of information act, YOU still maintain a special status in this case based on age until you 90's.  You've clearly tarnished any prior service or contribution ever made in the intelligence community now.

  I've often wondered , did you ever think about how crappy your timing has been in life ?  You, trained in Farsi and Arabic, had you not become the Lee Harvey Oswald of the Intelligence community, would probably now be in a GS-14/or 15 position for at least one of the agencies who have been hurting for real talent.  At the very least you would have made Lt.Col. in those twenty years, and even been able to stay on active duty given your wasted skillset.  BUT NOOOOOOOOOO !, You had to throw it all away and missed the opportunity of a lifetime.  It is in reality NOT an old analog polygraph that solely stood in your way toward the career you educated yourself for, but rather you method for living and shortcomings George as an all around package.  We have ONLY been told your perception of why you were not chosen, and again we see a false sense of entitlement by you the king of winers.  The reality is that the polygraph is the best thing we have for the job, and until someone can improve the process via another diagnostic apparatus, good men and women, people of family values, who will NOT compromise this nation, will well serve this nation's intelligence and law enforcement services despite the blemish you represent.  They know where you are, what your doing, and in reality you have assisted them by your little Maschkeites acting in ways wherein they self identify when it comes down to the one on one moment of truth.  Undoubtedly, if you really ever do get out of hand, you'll be swatted like a fly, or placed somewhere as the turncoat on the intelligence community.  Want proof, you brag from Holland that you have acted as no less than a source for Al Queda at your site.  What kind of an American are you ???.  You are no patriot, you piss me off, and I and others have the resources to deal with you if and when it ever becomes necessary. Stay in Holland you traiterous bastard.   

George:

I would make this jackass put up or ban him.  If I owned a site such as this, no one would come on and accuse me of what he has accused you of without the proof.  On second thought,  I say ban him anyway, and remove his posts.  Just my take.

TheNoLieGuy4U wrote on Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:41pm:


Sorry my friend, if you actually did alittle research, you would find that I have 30 yrs in LE, have taken 4 LIE DETECTOR tests, and passed three of them, the first being a false positive.  I still carry a badge, and my last poly was about 8 years ago.  So, go piss up a rope, you have nothing on me in the "enforcing the constitution" department.  Also, as you should know, there is no freedom of expression/speech on a private internet board, except for that which the owner wants to allow.  I think you suck, and would prefer to not read your drivel.  You obviously are just the latest incarnation of polyfools who come on here to attempt to discredit this site, without lending any cogent material for discussion.  Kiss my ass...