Hi Anti and Pro folks alike. This is a document/Affidavit which is public domain that swears before a judge that Antipolygraph's own Drew Richardson is a phony FBI Polygraph Examiner. Interestingly, Mr. Richardson has long boasted his FBI Examiner credentials and wealth of expertise and experience as a launch pad for his activism against polygraph. If the document and it's contents are true, than Mr. Richardson owes the people of this site both an explanation and an apology for committing such fraud. Have you no honor sir? Bellow is a cut and paste version of the attached file.
Yours, Paradiddle









CHARLES ELIAS, C.F.L.S.
Attorney at Law
4030 Palos Verdes Drive North, Suite 108
Rolling Hills Estates, California 90274-2526
Telephone:      (310) 541-4141
Facsimile:      (310) 544-3971
E-mail:      ce@alum.mit.edu
State Bar Number 046686

Attorney for Petitioner

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

In re the Marriage of:
ANTHONY MICHAEL MAYFIELD,
     Petitioner,
                             and,
KAREN AIKO MAYFIELD,
     Respondent.
CASE NO. YD 045 663
(Transferred for all purposes to the Central District, Dept 22, The Honorable Michael Linfield, Judge)


REPLY DECLARATION of mark johnson to RESPONSIVE DECLARATION of drew richardson

DATE:      August 10, 2005
     TIME:      8:45 A.M.
     DEPT.:      CE 22

     I, mark johnson, declare as follows:
1.I am a former FBI agent.  From 1990 to 1995 I was a field agent in the FBI’s Washington Field Office.  From 1995 to 1998 I was a Supervising Special Agent in the Polygraph Unit at FBI Headquarters, Washington, D.C.
2.From 1990-1998, in order to become certified as a FBI polygraph examiner an agent had to first complete the 3 to 4 month introductory program at the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute in Aniston, Alabama.  During this time, the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute gave training to future polygraph examiners for the FBI, NSA, DOD, Postal Service, Border Patrol, Army, Navy and Marines.  Sometime after 1995, the CIA also sent examiner candidates to this school.
3.In the FBI, after completing the introductory program at the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute, a candidate for certification was required to conduct at least twenty (20) polygraph examinations under the supervision of a FBI certified polygraph examiner.  After the requisite examinations were concluded, a Supervising Special Agent at the Polygraph Unit, FBI Headquarters reviewed the paperwork generated by the examinations.  Additionally, the FBI certified polygraph examiner who supervised the candidate’s examinations made a written recommendation to the FBI Polygraph Unit Chief as to whether the candidate should become certified as a FBI certified polygraph examiner.  This process generally took six months to a year to complete.
4.During this time, I reported to the FBI Polygraph Unit Chief, James K. Murphy.  Mr. Murphy assigned me to supervise Mr. Drew Richardson’s required twenty (20) polygraph examinations after Mr. Richardson had completed the introductory program at the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute so that he could become certified.   
5.I am not exactly sure as to when Mr. Murphy assigned me to supervise Mr. Richardson’s required twenty (20) polygraph examinations.  My best estimate is that it was sometime between 1991 to 1994.
6.I remember Mr. Richardson very well because he conducted the worst polygraph examination I have ever witnessed.  After his first polygraph examination was completed I told him that his test was so poorly done that it was difficult to know where to start a critique.  I spent at least two hours reviewing the entire examination process with Mr. Richardson.  I later made from between five to seven further appointments for Mr. Richardson to administer additional polygraph examinations under my supervision.  Mr. Richardson cancelled each test.   
7.As a Field agent, I did not have the authority to decide whether Mr. Richardson would receive a FBI polygraph examiner certification.  This authority was vested with the Unit Chief, Mr. Murphy.   
8.I wrote an internal memorandum to Mr. Murphy advising Mr. Murphy that Mr. Richardson was, in my opinion, unqualified, incompetent, and ill-suited to conduct polygraph examinations for the FBI.  I cannot recall all of the details of my memorandum.  I do recall that I specifically stated in the memorandum that Mr. Richardson was unable to construct a fair and satisfactory polygraph test and that he could not correctly interpret polygraph charts.   
9.Mr. Murphy adopted my assessment of Mr. Richardson.  Drew Richardson never received a certification as an FBI Polygraph Examiner and was never authorized by the FBI to conduct polygraph examinations. 
10.Dated this ________________at Leesburg, Virginia, I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.


     __________________________________
     Mark Johnson

Paradiddle,

I for one would take Drew Richardsons word and reputation long before some trade school trained BS artist polygrapher. And you found a document, unsigned and invalid, real court documents are public record, with the stamps and signatures that make them valid. Do these people know you have their private documents ? You could have invaded someones privacy and if they are fake (forging) court documents well,  thats illegal don't you know !  For all we know you could be trying to steal someones identity. Again questionable activities by a questionable practitioner of a psuedo-science.  Like this wasn't expected. 


Swing & a Miss .......

EosJupiter wrote on Sep 25^th, 2007 at 5:25pm:

 Sheesh George----so much for decorum---Eos called me a trade school BS artist (wahhh). Ad hom attacks aside, perhaps the crew here is projecting some disappointment over "Dr." Richardson's (now) questionable mastery of polygraph. I recall him once insinuating that he administered scores and scores of polygraph tests and that he regretted such. Uh huh, yeah. So, that leaves me with one question. With his pathetic performance at DODPI (not exactly MIT as you all would say), his irrelevant experience in Toxicology and waste, what exactly did he do at DODPI lab? Perhaps the Feds placed him in the position of Supervisor of Making Coffee and Replacing Ink in Polygraph Instrument Printers and Pen Bottles (ink is "toxic" you know)?

This is a detailed critique of the methodological shortcomings of the Honts & Alloway study in action - watch the actual video of  DACA's peer reviewed studies and learn how they conduct their studies!!!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8534038772412420905
 
Dr. Capps and Robert Andrews would be proud of this demonstration of DACA's scientific method in action.

I have watched this board for years and I also recall somewhere that Drew mentions administering hundreds of polygraphs.  A phoney  - all I can say is I am in shock & awe.   

Paradiddle - What else are you going to pull out of your hat? lol

Quote:


Okay, so let me get this straight...

Dr. Drew Richardson, the man who testified on capital hill as the self proclaimed "FBI's TOP polygraph expert," actually administered MAYBE one or two tests after the completion of polygraph school.  Then, as a result of either his less then steller performance (or piss-poor attitude?) during those examinations was encouraged by the FBI's polygraph director to seek employment elseware?

Gee, and I thought there were minimum certification requirements in the federal government.  I thought the feds require among other things that a polygraph school graduate administer a minimum number of exams before his agency can certify him...

soooo...

It seems the infamous Dr. Drew Richardson, who testifies all over the place (including congress) as an "expert federal polygraph examiner" was not only NEVER CERTIFIED to conduct polygraph examinations, but was basically FIRED from the program after conducting only ONE OR TWO TESTS?

Wow, think of the tens of thousands of $$$ the FBI wasted training this loser.  As a taxpayer, I believe I am appalled...

Gee, finally this is all making sense.  I have met people like this Drew Richardson.  Guys who can't make it in the field, and spend the rest of their lives blaming everyone other than themselves.  People who's huge egos just can't accept the fact they failed at something....

You know,  I find myself feeling sorta sorry for this fellow....

Nonombre

When it comes to intelligence, you and the other polygraphers who visit this site can't carry Dr. Richardson's jock. Your added hominy attacks on the anti's is the best you can do and call it a debate. Then all of you accuse the anti's of doing it. Quite a debate. Huh? Hell, I admit that I don't know enough about the poly to effectively debate it. All I know is that EosJupitor and I can make your machine read what ever we want it to read without squeezing any musle. It's called brain manipulation which you cannot detect because it's over your head.

Twoblock wrote on Sep 26^th, 2007 at 2:34am:



Eos, do you claim this man to be your lawful.........

Twoblock impresses me with his grit------ok, no not really. I am afraid that he has fallen prey to fawning over Drew Richardson the niche celebrity, not Drew Richardson the actual man. When this site exposes a phony PHD Polygraph Celeb-----I wait and see----as I am disgusted with such phoniness and you won't see me defending idiocy. Anti-folks seem to embrace their "reluctant" hero without wondering if they really know who they revel. I think we know why he was so reluctant. Let this be a lesson to those who sanctify their leaders and their "expert" advocates.