Very Confused...

>>Michelle, obviously comprehension is not your long suit either.  Thats ok, people with a double digit IQ have that problem.<<

Right, when you can't address the issues, attack instead.  I may well give you a dose of your own medicine here and there but at least I address the issues, unlike you.  

>>I don't care how many rx's you have unfilled.  I don't care how many pills you have from rx's you haven't taken.  You could still by them on the street illegally.<<

Do you know what a prescription is?  How stupid are you?  Seriously, can you be this ignorant?  I am willing to scan the actual labels, photograph that WITH the easily identifiable tablets AND a prescription for even more Dex *with* proof of my identity and you think this is similar to a suppository?  And yes, you spelled suppository incorrectly right after referring to my double digit IQ.  How bright is that?

Allow me to explain something to you.  A suppository is usually larger than a tablet, they are in a base much different from a tablet, they do not contain any ingredients that bind powder together like a tablet but instead are in a different base completely.  Most important Mr. Confused, is that a tablet is taken orally.  That would be by your mouth.  A suppository goes up your rear end.  See the difference?  Do you need pictures of tablets vs. suppositories?

>>Also, you were talking about sending photos not actual pills.  A bunch of white pills in an rx bottle could be alot of things.<<

::::blink:::   

You are suggesting I send the actual pills?  Needing a little "pick me up" are we?  (wink wink nudge nudge)

Cutey, THAT would be illegal and you wouldn't want me to do that now would you?  Also, please explain how scanning would get the actual tablets to the disinterested 3rd party?

Dex isn't white first of all and for the 3rd time I will explain AGAIN that tablets are easily identifiable.  Call a drug company and ask them.

>>I guess your warped perception is not limited to just right and wrong.<<

Already address about 6 times previously.

>>It is amazing that you are such an expert in the written word that you can tell that Batman and I are one and the same.  Where did you get that training?  It must come in handy alot.  Sorry, you are wrong but I am sure that will not stop you from believing because you have overwelming proof.<<

Straw man.  You *do* know what a straw man is, right?  I never claimed expertise in writing techniques, I never claimed to have training, and I never claimed to have overwhelming proof.  This is your claim, not mine, that is another Batman technique.

>>By all means find an objective third party (how about Skeptic?) and send your photos.  It wouldn't prove anything but you don't care about that, after all you have Batman cold.  Please send blow ups, I suspect you should be using supositories (please check the spelling on that for me, it's your field).<<

Again, I already explained the difference between a suppository and a tablet.  Further discussion I fear would feed into a potential anal perversion of yours.

>>Instead of attacking me would you talk more about your morals and values?  It is more informative.<<

If a polygraph is accurate I could have the morals of Jack the Ripper and it wouldn't matter, now would it?

>>Please include your God, the one with lower standards.<<

Lower standards?  Your proof please?  Then tell me exactly who my god is so that you can prove your statements.  You aren't pulling yet ANOTHER Batman are you?  Surely you don't have that many similarities in your writing style.  Or do you?  Now prove your statements that my god has lower standards than your god.  Put up or shut up.  (Where have we heard that before?)

If you want to talk religion I suggest you start a thread in the appropriate folder and I'll to head to head with you.  Keep in mind, I'll bet you Batman's good money (that is soon to be mine) that I know your bible better than you do.  You don't know my history, you need to know that I rarely lose a bible debate.  Actually, I don't recall ever losing a bible debate.

>>After all I am just a dumb no body who is trying to learn.  I have had it wrong all these years, I thought lying and cheating was a bad thing.<<

Already addressed your IQ issues per your standards and as for dishonesty, that has been addressed at least 6 times now.  New material otherwise people will be convinced you are Batman.  Heh...

Twoblock...

>>BTW, you seem to be able to take it as well as dish it out. DAMN, did I say something good about you?<<

But Batman isn't taking it at all.  He is ignoring it, hoping it will go away, or perhaps trying to find a way to get himself off his cross.

Either way he isn't taking a thing.

New topic:  50 years, eh?  Wow, that is cool.  Seriously, that is something for you to be extremely proud of and for others to admire.  You should sell the secret, you'd be worth bazillions.

Personally my b/f and I have been together for 15 years but we aren't married yet.  I don't like to rush into things. <snark>

Twoblock wrote on Feb 21^st, 2003 at 8:15pm:


Nah.  He's clever.  He knows he can't win on the facts or debate honestly, so he has to resort to inflammatory accusations and game playing.  It's pretty obvious.

It's also not terribly surprising.  In my experience one part of interrogation/polygraphy is ignoring objections/logic and endlessly repeating accusations until the target breaks down (strangely, another trait he and "Confused" have in common...).  The only problem in this context is that there's no leverage.

Skeptic

Michelle wrote on Feb 21^st, 2003 at 8:51pm:


it hasn't been easy...

Yahoo!  Ride 'em cowboy, are we having fun or what?  My sides ache from laughing so hard.   

OK, let's start with Michelle,

First, Batman is no damn cartoon character, he a friggin' Super Hero.  Popeye is a bloody cartoon character.  You must be trying to piss me off!

As for you possibly being a guy, I take that back.  You have to be a woman, you won't shut up long enough to let anyone get a word in.  You posted at 11:15, 11:17, 11:19, 11:27, 11:43, 12:13 (Did you take a nap?), 12:23, and 12:51 (Did you pop a Dex?).  That's all the proof I need that you are either high or a dumb blond.  By the way, what do you call a smart blond?  A golden retriever!  Oh, that's a good one, I'm cracking myself up!!!

You asked whether I'm a man or a polygraph examiner?  Can't I be both?  Actually, like I said, I a damn Super Hero!

What's good money?  Hell everyone knows (everyone except you I guess), any money is good money!

As for the possibility that I may be 'confused', well I have been confused, but I'm not 'confused'.

Two Block,

I ain't Navy so what does all that mean?!?  And please don't take my Popeye remark the wrong way, I have the utmost respect for Popeye, he too is an ass kicker, he's just not classified as a Super Hero.  But, you gotta ask yourself, what does he see in Olive Oil?   

You're OK in my book!  We may not agree on much, hell on anything, but you being former military (and a gold miner to boot) puts you up there.

Septic,

I don't have to proove anything.  That's the beauty of this site.  Everyone can lay out their lines of bullshit and press on.  As for Michelle suing me for libel, have at it.  File C/O Marvel Comics.

As for me being 'confused', give me a little credit (No negative reflection on confused intended.  You all know it's not in me to insult anyone.)  I may be stupid (cause I can't spell and got bad grammer), I may be hateful, I may be paranoid, I may be unsympathetic, I may be gross, and God forbid, I am a polygraph examiner, but I am not 'confused'!  I am... 

BATMAN 

PS: Triple X, if you're reading any of this, you'll note that I'm taking on a whole shouthouse full of crappers here, with no help from my friends!  You want to know why numbnuts?  Because I don't have any.  AMF you Special Forces kind of guy you!

Batman wrote on Feb 21^st, 2003 at 10:16pm:


Is that what you call your posts here?  Why not just start posting cartoons and claim victory?

The day you actually start debating the polygraph is the day you can claim to do anything here but spew (although that 8-ball post was kinda funny).

Skeptic

Mr. Loser of the wager:

>>As for me being 'confused', give me a little credit (No negative reflection on confused intended.  You all know it's not in me to insult anyone.)  I may be stupid (cause I can't spell and got bad grammer), I may be hateful, I may be paranoid, I may be unsympathetic, I may be gross, and God forbid, I am a polygraph examiner, but I am not 'confused'!  I am...<< 

Heh... is this a slip??  Oh my, I think it is.  Your use of grammar was the only accusation that I recall reading or writing.  The "stupid" part and the inability to "spell" was Confused.

However the rest seems pretty accurate except I do think you are Confused in more ways than one.

It would appear you cannot keep up with your own dishonesty and if you had any credibility here as a polygrapher, you lost it today, Mr. Lost The Wager And Too Freaky To Apologize And Pay Up.

I do believe my work with *you* is done.  :::patting self and new friends on back:::  Anything in the future will be for amusement and entertainment purposes only.