Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 25 post(s).
Posted by: Wandersmann
Posted on: Oct 15th, 2017 at 8:57pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Quote:
Quote:
i have failed 2x polygraph test in a jewellery compnay relating to theft and im 100% innocent 

i have nevwr stolen a cent in my life 

please help ..... how is this possible


Why was an employee in the private sector being polygraphed at all?


Good point.  I don't think a jewelry store can require employee to submit to polygraph.   I can tell you, however, that private sector employees can be polygraphed any time if they are required to possess a government security clearance while working on a government contract. 
Posted by: guest
Posted on: Oct 15th, 2017 at 4:57pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Quote:
i have failed 2x polygraph test in a jewellery compnay relating to theft and im 100% innocent 

i have nevwr stolen a cent in my life 

please help ..... how is this possible


Why was an employee in the private sector being polygraphed at all?
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:06am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Quote:
i have failed 2x polygraph test in a jewellery compnay relating to theft and im 100% innocent 

i have nevwr stolen a cent in my life 

please help ..... how is this possible


Wesley,

As Doug pointed out, what happened to you happens to many people. It doesn't mean that there's anything wrong with you. The problem is that polygraphy is a pseudoscientific fraud. The main polygraph techniques in use today were developed by interrogators, not scientists. In fact, the most widely used technique is the brainchild of a crackpot who thought plants can read human minds. It is quite common for truthful people to "fail" the "test," especially when they are wrongly suspected of a crime.
Posted by: Doug Williams
Posted on: Oct 13th, 2017 at 6:09pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Quote:
i have failed 2x polygraph test in a jewellery compnay relating to theft and im 100% innocent 

i have nevwr stolen a cent in my life 

please help ..... how is this possible


Unfortunately this happens all too often.  Thirty years ago, I proved the polygraph, when used as a "lie detector", is a sick joke.  On this episode of CBS 60 MINUTES, three different polygraph operators called 3 different innocent, truthful people liars on a crime that never even happened!  Check it out: https://youtu.be/ziMAoHhxiYQ
Posted by: wesley
Posted on: Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:46pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
i have failed 2x polygraph test in a jewellery compnay relating to theft and im 100% innocent 

i have nevwr stolen a cent in my life 

please help ..... how is this possible
Posted by: Administrator
Posted on: Nov 12th, 2011 at 12:34pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Off-Topic replies have been moved to this Topic.
Posted by: Donna O leary
Posted on: Nov 4th, 2011 at 11:59am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
george thank you so much!! ill tell her to ring you!
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Oct 31st, 2011 at 7:03pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Donna,

If your nan were to call me, I'd be happy to speak with her about polygraph matters. She can best reach me at +1 424 835 1225. If she has a computer, she can call this number free via the "call me" button on this page of my personal website. Alternatively, I can be reached via Skype or Google Talk (links in my signature block below).
Posted by: Donna O Leary
Posted on: Oct 31st, 2011 at 2:33pm
  Mark & Quote
George W. Maschke wrote on Oct 21st, 2011 at 7:44pm:
Donna,

It is not at all unusual for truthful people to wrongly fail the polygraph. You'll find statements from others who were falsely accused of deception (myself included) here:

https://antipolygraph.org/statements.shtml

Polygraph "testing" has no scientific basis, and the results should not be relied on for any purpose. Your family wasted its money on the lie detector, and it would be a mistake to throw good money after bad by taking yet another lie detector test.

Instead, I suggest that you educate your family about the unreliability of lie detector testing. You'll find a thorough debunking of it in our free book, The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, which you can download here:

https://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf

You may also wish to show them this CBS 60 Minutes investigative report on lie detector:

https://antipolygraph.org/blog/?p=110



Thanks for the reply i told my nan what you said and they still dont believe me ! i tryed to educate them and some familly members are open to this and others are not. is there any way that you could possibly speak to my nan and give her your perspective? i understand if you cant but i really need to get through to her mabye she might listen to you
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Oct 21st, 2011 at 7:44pm
  Mark & Quote
Donna,

It is not at all unusual for truthful people to wrongly fail the polygraph. You'll find statements from others who were falsely accused of deception (myself included) here:

https://antipolygraph.org/statements.shtml

Polygraph "testing" has no scientific basis, and the results should not be relied on for any purpose. Your family wasted its money on the lie detector, and it would be a mistake to throw good money after bad by taking yet another lie detector test.

Instead, I suggest that you educate your family about the unreliability of lie detector testing. You'll find a thorough debunking of it in our free book, The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, which you can download here:

https://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf

You may also wish to show them this CBS 60 Minutes investigative report on lie detector:

https://antipolygraph.org/blog/?p=110
Posted by: Donna O Leary
Posted on: Oct 21st, 2011 at 3:28pm
  Mark & Quote
Hia my name is donna im 17 years old, last year there was money taken from my nans house , there wer a few people in the house that could have done it. i was never in my nanas room where she kept her money . eventually they paid for a lie detector test to be taken of all of the familly. everyone passed and i failed ?????? i dont know why i fail maybye i was nervous but that shouldnt count?? my mam and dad 100 percent know i didnt do it . i cant stop crying at the fact my own family think i roobed my nan and granda. my dad swore to them he would provbe me innocent and hes trying to save up money so i can get another one taken but we dont have the money right now. it could take upto a year before we can get the money together . im totally in despair and i dont know what to do please help me understand when i failed. its not fair on me or my nan and granda. im really close to all my familly i feel like ann outcast. its my birthday next week and i dont even think im allowed over there . i feel so lost please help me Sad:(Sad:(Sad
Posted by: seryty
Posted on: Aug 9th, 2011 at 1:20am
  Mark & Quote
If you talk to a local examiner who is listed in APA or AAPP then I would suspect you would get the truth from that examiner. Polygraph examiners have ego but want the truth. They are continuoisly seeking continued education and argue among themselves for the right way. This is a profession and they are professionals. The "hacks" are everywhere. I would blame this problem on your employer and not the examiner. It's too bad you are going through this. Your employer needs to be upfront and honest with the testing because you are not guilty until proven guilty. I have given many exams and passed the examinee. I have no problem explaining they passed. I make my questions fair and I fully expect to pass each examinee at evry test. When they fail; I make no qualms about their failure. If there are problems with the exam, I dissect them to see where the problem areas are. I belive in these exams and if a polygraph examiner is truly after the truth then they also make sure they are giving the proper exam with the proper questions. You know if you are innocent. Stay strong and make sure your employer followed the EPPA laws. No one should have to go through that and have an employer lie to the employee to get a truth test. Polygraphs are about the truth. Start to finish.
Posted by: Dottie
Posted on: Aug 2nd, 2011 at 10:03am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Thank you SO much George. What a relief to read your info. x Smiley
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Aug 2nd, 2011 at 5:12am
  Mark & Quote
Quote:
My Fiance just failed a poly test really badly and I am scared. He is much younger than I am and is from another country. SO I agreed to marry him IF he took a poly test, which I paid $500 for. The administer, Mark, came to my place, ask us why I want the test and some background info, as to why I would ask about infidelity. I was allowed to ask 5 questions (like have you kissed other girls, etc). Mark told me out of 9999, you would "have to get at least 7,000 to be considered an honest person". SADLY my guy got a score of 1,734. So he failed miserably. 
My guy CRIED real tears for HOURS telling me he is innocent and this test must be wrong. He swears on his Mothers life he has been loyal etc. Is there a chance he was accused falsely? I would love your opinion

Thanks

Dottie


Dottie,

Yes, there is every chance that your fiancé was accused falsely. Polygraph "testing" has no scientific basis. It's a pseudoscientific fraud that actually depends on the polygraph operator lying to and otherwise deceiving the person being "tested" about the nature of the procedure. Worse still, polygraphy has an inherent bias against truthful persons.

For more on why polygraph results are not to be relied upon, see our book, The Lie Behind the Lie Detector (1 mb PDF).

Regarding the harm that can be caused by misplaced reliance on polygraphy in personal relationships, see Gary Smith's statement, "How I Failed My Polygraph Exam" (PDF).
Posted by: Dottie
Posted on: Aug 1st, 2011 at 11:34pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
My Fiance just failed a poly test really badly and I am scared. He is much younger than I am and is from another country. SO I agreed to marry him IF he took a poly test, which I paid $500 for. The administer, Mark, came to my place, ask us why I want the test and some background info, as to why I would ask about infidelity. I was allowed to ask 5 questions (like have you kissed other girls, etc). Mark told me out of 9999, you would "have to get at least 7,000 to be considered an honest person". SADLY my guy got a score of 1,734. So he failed miserably. 
My guy CRIED real tears for HOURS telling me he is innocent and this test must be wrong. He swears on his Mothers life he has been loyal etc. Is there a chance he was accused falsely? I would love your opinion

Thanks

Dottie
Posted by: llll
Posted on: Dec 27th, 2008 at 12:21am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Since i posted last the company caught the guy that had kept his job red handed stealing from exactly what had been being taken that I was suspended for.  I am still awaiting a decision on my employment but get no response anymore and they owe me for my week vacation and two bonuses i am due.
Posted by: Magnus
Posted on: Dec 17th, 2008 at 2:43pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I'll bet you a cup of coffee your employer lied to you again.  I bet you could be re-tested, but your employer found out she messed up and is back tracking.  The couple I know who went to the Grogan lie detector, ended up going to a another individual who resolved their issue.   

Sorry to hear your employer is not up front with you.
Posted by: T.M. Cullen
Posted on: Dec 17th, 2008 at 3:20am
  Mark & Quote
Quote:
The day after I was suspended, I found a local polygraph examiner who is on my state's board of examiners, so I would assume this examiner would be more reputable.


What good is that given the fact that polygraphy is a "bogus" science?  Would it make you feel better going to a "psychic" who is a on the your state's "Psychic Board of Examiners"?  Put another way.  If a used car sales person ripped you off, would you go to another, more reputable  Lips Sealed used car salesman to help you?

Get REAL!

Quote:
I don't want to stay at the job because it is now too stressful....



If it gets to the point where it (the false accusations levied against youy) is affecting your health, go to a doctor and make sure it is documented (every step of the way) for later use by your attorney.  If your doctor deems the ill health affects (if any) attributed to your situation with this employer, file a WORKERS COMP CLAIM.  That should be a nice scoop of vanilla ice cream on your employer's apple pie.    Wink
Posted by: gary davis
Posted on: Dec 17th, 2008 at 3:13am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
hi.. you are calling the wrong people.. you need to talk to the Department of Labor..they investigate and initiate action.. if they find a violation then you can sue... based upon what you've said I see a number of violations of the EPPA  including the confidentiality agreement

gary davis
Posted by: screwedinap
Posted on: Dec 17th, 2008 at 2:03am
  Mark & Quote
Update - I still have not been given the results of my test.  Magnus, thank you for the info on the examiners.  

The day after I was suspended, I found a local polygraph examiner who is on my state's board of examiners, so I would assume this examiner would be more reputable.  When my employer contacted the new examiner and explained the situation, the examiner stated that she did not believe in re-testing (keep in mind, I'm being told this by the same employer that lied to me) and that because we weren't given proper notice of the exam that the results needed to be thrown out and we would re-test in 3 months.  I, again, asked for my test results so I could contact an examiner on my own and at least have them look at the graph results and give an opinion, but nothing yet.. So I have my job back, but with a huge cloud of suspicion over me which is causing me a great deal of stress.  Because the results were not kept confidential initially, even our customers know what's going on!  

Since I got my job back, all of the employees were also asked to sign a confidentiality agreement and back-date it to the date the test was given,  so no one is to talk about anything in conjunction with the test, or other aspects of the business for that matter.

I have left messages for two labor law attorneys in my area but neither has called me back yet.  Maybe with more details they would be more interested.  

I don't want to stay at the job because it is now too stressful, but I don't want to leave and look guilty.  I was hesitant to sue at first, but the way I see it, my employer has screwed us both.  For whatever reason she pinpointed me and had the examiner target me when I didn't even have the opportunity to commit this crime, so now she has an unknown thief working for her waiting to steal again and blame it on someone else.
Posted by: Twoblock
Posted on: Dec 17th, 2008 at 1:22am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
To both victims

I don't know either state's laws, but i'll bet neither allows what happened to you both. I would think neither would accept anyone being fired from a job based solely on the polygraph or CVSA.  More good advice get a lawyer and sue.
Posted by: Magnus
Posted on: Dec 16th, 2008 at 11:50pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
SCREWEDINAP,

Your female examiner was Dawn Walsh from Arrow Polygraph out of Southern CA.  She belongs to a group called Polygraph Examiners of America run by a guy named John Grogan out of Los Angeles.  This guy Grogan has been in hot water a whole bunch of times along with several of his folks.  (This guy Grogan created some problems for a couple I know who went to him for a  Angrypolygraph.)

George is right.  Never mind a second opinion, your employer did not follow the law and you should find a good attorney.  You may even have the opportunity to go after the examiner.  I don't know what credentials or training you need in CA to be an examiner.  From what I know, the company cannot fire you just based on the polygraph.  

I'm sorry to hear your boss lied to the employees.
Posted by: wasup
Posted on: Dec 16th, 2008 at 2:26am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
scenario: took the test and failed but innocent!!! an admitted thief passed and still has their job.  myself now unemployed.  want to know if in the state of nevada is the cvsa is admissable in court.  from what i heard it is admissable in california.  to boot i found out i was unemployed because the stand in manager informed a client in front of an employee before i had heard from hr that was no longer suspended but fired.  and to add insult to injury the big boss had covered 1/2 of the theft by writing a check and covering it.  visual tapes show that no body including me did it but the result of the test was taken over the tape.
Posted by: G Scalabr
Posted on: Dec 11th, 2008 at 7:23am
  Mark & Quote
Quote:
I'll keep reading the book - I now wish I hadn't been so damn honest.  I truly feel this 'failed' result is because of an unqualified, perhaps even biased polygrapher.

As soon as I have the company name I'll email it to you.  Since we weren't not given anything in writing, the only thing I know is the examiner was a female named Dawn and her 'observer' was named Steve.


When it comes to detecting deception, you cannot single out a particular polygraph operator as being unqualified. You need to keep in mind that the field as a whole is incompetent at this task. 

When things go south, the polygraph establishment loves to blame the examiner. Still, the cold hard fact is that NO polygraph examiner has demonstrated the ability to determine truth from deception at better than chance levels in a peer-reviewed study conducted under field conditions. 

You failed, not because of examiner error, but because you were judged with an invalid "test."

As George said, you need to get an attorney who specializes in labor law ASAP. As you pointed out, it appears that the EPPA was severely violated in this case. 
Posted by: SCREWEDINAP
Posted on: Dec 11th, 2008 at 7:05am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I'll keep reading the book - I now wish I hadn't been so damn honest.  I truly feel this 'failed' result is because of an unqualified, perhaps even biased polygrapher.

As soon as I have the company name I'll email it to you.  Since we weren't not given anything in writing, the only thing I know is the examiner was a female named Dawn and her 'observer' was named Steve.
 
  Top