Philly polygraphers let one squeak through

Started by beech trees, Oct 11, 2002, 02:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

intheknow

Dep Dawg,

FYI, if you search the archives of the (I think) Washington Post (maybe the NY Times), Late 1999/early 2000, I do believe you will find an interview conducted with GM concerning polygraph.  In this interview the ever mysterious Capt Jones is reveled to be our beloved founder George Maschake.

PS:  George update your photo on the UCLA web site http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/people/maschke/

the breeze

Beech Trees
I am not sure if you finally felt a need to prove you are not a desk bound geek or what caused your latest incident of venting, but Im sure we all admire you.  I do not believe I seriously talk about dangers I have faced, but you on the other hand may feel you need to prove something.  If I have brought up the issue of background, it is because some one that has experience with the polygraph (to me at least) has more credibility when talking about the manner in which it is used.  You have instead taken this to mean that I or others are comparing our courage, character, or worth of profession to yours. I have no idea if you are a lion or a weasel, but I do know that you will borrow a passage from a traitor like Ames (Aftergood letter) rather than provide something original.  What you do lack in experience you make up for in hysteria and that is why people interact with you poorly.  I will just ignore your personal remarks in the last post where you made yourself look like an ass.  If you want a lesson in communication without condescension, see most of fair chances responses or even Mark M's.  As for replying to me, you have nothing I need.
George?
Since we understand that you are the reserve officer who asked to remain anonymous (asked who?) please explain why you felt it necessary to caution me on authorship.  I am who I said I am, as you know.  But how can we believe any testamonial presented here in these circumstances? and why not just be up front?? By the way on this topic, what did the agency fail you for, since it was not a test for espionage.
If you want, I can approach my Sheriff about an honorary commission in the reserves, or maybe the mounted patrol.  Let me know.
Your other site is quite interesting...
Pissing on nettles indeed!

Skeptic


Quote from: the breeze on Nov 25, 2002, 05:54 PM
Beech Trees
I am not sure if you finally felt a need to prove you are not a desk bound geek or what caused your latest incident of venting, but Im sure we all admire you.  I do not believe I seriously talk about dangers I have faced, but you on the other hand may feel you need to prove something.  If I have brought up the issue of background, it is because some one that has experience with the polygraph (to me at least) has more credibility when talking about the manner in which it is used.


Breeze,
By any chance, do you have more than one person posting under your name?  You seem very unaware of what "you" have posted previously or the context in which people reply to you.  In a prior post, "The Breeze" did indeed taunt Beech Trees regarding danger he's faced, saying that "calling [you] a liar" was about the closest he's come to danger.

At the very least, you are sometimes extremely unclear.

Skeptic

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last month of the year?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview