Controversy Over Brain Fingerprinting Proposal

Started by George W. Maschke, Nov 13, 2001, 11:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

George W. Maschke

(While this post is not directly related to polygraph policy, I'm posting it here because the topic has relevance to the detection of deception and is likely to be of interest to those concerned with polygraph policy.)

If you've been following the Polygraph News page on AntiPolygraph.org in recent months, you're probably aware of Dr. Larry Farwell's "brain fingerprinting" technique for assessing whether a person recognizes a stimulus.

InfoSeek founder Steve Kirsch proposed the adaption of brain fingerpriting for the screening of airline passengers in an October 2001 article titled "Identifying terrorists before they strike" that is available on his website. The above-referenced article also includes feedback from readers, a link to an appendix, and links to related web pages.

In a 3 October 2001 article titled "Brain-scans can defeat terrorism, InfoSeek founder claims," Thomas C. Greene of The Register lambasted Kirsch's proposal.

Kirsch's spirited response to Green's article is also available on Kirch's website.
George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Signal Private Messenger: ap_org.01
SimpleX: click to contact me securely and anonymously
E-mail: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many states are in the United States? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview