New to the site...THANKS TO FAILING A POLY LAST WK

Started by polysuck, Dec 16, 2006, 01:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

LieBabyCryBaby

What part of "everyone lies" don't you understand, Polyfool? Some people may be more honest than others, but I maintain that no one is "completely honest." If a person is "completely honest," then perhaps he or she should be that priest rather than that cop. We of course claim that we want "completely honest" people for the job, but that is an ideal, not a reality. And remember--admitting to every little lie in the interview process does not make a person appear to be honest.  Not in the polygrapher's mind, and not in their own mind. It simply makes them appear afraid now that they have to "face the music."  

polysuck

LieBaby, are you sure you're not the polygrapher who performed my test???  Or do they give you guys a book to quote?? LOL....seems i've heard some of this before...especially the priest line.

gr8dad

LBCB, I noticed something you said a few entry's ago.  You said that you know the IN's and the OUT's of the polygraph.  That is the problem!  If this machine is so accurate as you and your idiot colleges claim it to be than there should be no IN's and OUT's to it.  It should just do what it is suppose to do.  Determine between TRUTH and LIES!  Why is there IN's and OUT's?  There are no variables to lying or telling the truth!  Either you lied or you told the truth.  Your arguments are nonsense and absolutely with no theoretical or scientific base!

gr8dad

One more thing LBCB.  I have set and read all of your propaganda about how wonderful your little machine is, but you are yet to provide any HARD scientific or pyschological evidence that shows without a doubt that it does what you say it does with even a stitch of accuracy.  This is true of all of your colleges as well.   Those that oppose the polygraph have put forth thousands of pages of hundreds of UNBIASED scientific and psychological research data.  All you have to support your claims is that you have "experience" operating the machine.  Well, a bulldozer operator has experience operating that too, so if he tells me it can read my mind and tell him I am lying should I believe him too.  Either put up or just shut up!  

gr8dad

LBCB, above you stated that "the examiner will either help you save yourself or hang yourself, whatever you truly deserve".  So, you yourself just admitted that the examiner can make that choice for the machine.  Why would they need to do that if the machine is capable of doing it no matter what?  There you have it folks!  Just another polygrapher talking out of both sides of their mouth!

gr8dad

Great observation Fender!  What else would you expect a test to be when it is operated and advocated by such shallow individuals?  Haven't you noticed the game of dodgeball they play when it comes to actually providing any REAL proof that the thing even remotely works the way they so eagerly proclaim that it does?  Things that make you go HMMMMM!

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Type the third word in this sentence: 'The quick brown fox jumps.' (answer in lowercase):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview