Admissible in court

Started by dc585, Jan 27, 2017, 10:23 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

dc585

After realizing how inaccurate polygraph testing is, I am confused why in some states it is still Admissible in court?

gary davis

Perhaps your information on reliability is incorrect

xenonman

Quote from: dwpowpow on Jan 27, 2017, 10:23 AMAfter realizing how inaccurate polygraph testing is, I am confused why in some states it is still Admissible in court?

Probably for the same reason that its use is mandated by probation/parole authorities and required of registered sex offenders in  many states.  :)
What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security
and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac?   A great beginning!

The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!

Wandersmann

QuotePerhaps your information on reliability is incorrect
No, it's correct.  Use your brain.  Can measuring bio-reactions read someone's mind?  It scares me how many dim-witted people are running around today.  If they start burning witches again I think that half the population of this country would but into it.

dc585

Polygraph measure physical response from the body. It does not read the mind. I know for a fact that I can have huge physical response to a question and absolutely not be lying.
Could it detect a lie ? Yes, of course, but just because there was a physical response to a question does not always mean it was triggered by a lie. I would give it 50/50 at best, but it would really depend on the situation of course. More data to take into consideration than is.
Frightening stuff.

Ex Member

Quote from: dwpowpow on Feb 01, 2017, 11:18 AMCould it detect a lie ? Yes, of course, but just because there was a physical response to a question does not always mean it was triggered by a lie.

Your words hit the mark precisely. There is little doubt about sensitivity, but specificity is the fly in the ointment.

George W. Maschke

Quote from: Arkhangelsk on Feb 01, 2017, 12:01 PMThere is little doubt about sensitivity, but specificity is the fly in the ointment.

The polygraph instrument is sensitive to fluctuations in breathing, perspiration, blood pressure, and heart rate, but there is considerable doubt about polygraphy's sensitivity as a lie test because the physiological indices measured by the polygraph haven't been shown to be systematically correlated with lying or truth-telling. As Dr. Alan P. Zelicoff put it, "From a medical and scientific standpoint, it is not sufficient to measure well that which should not be measured in the first place."
George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Signal Private Messenger: ap_org.01
SimpleX: click to contact me securely and anonymously
E-mail: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"

xenonman

Quote from: George_Maschke on Feb 02, 2017, 03:17 AM
Quote from: Arkhangelsk on Feb 01, 2017, 12:01 PMThere is little doubt about sensitivity, but specificity is the fly in the ointment.

The polygraph instrument is sensitive to fluctuations in breathing, perspiration, blood pressure, and heart rate, but there is considerable doubt about polygraphy's sensitivity as a lie test because the physiological indices measured by the polygraph haven't been shown to be systematically correlated with lying or truth-telling. As Dr. Alan P. Zelicoff put it, "From a medical and scientific standpoint, it is not sufficient to measure well that which should not be measured in the first place."

The main value of the polygraph has little to do with measuring physiological changes, or indeed with any branch of science for that matter.  It is a tool for intimidation and instilling fear.

Much like astrology, the polygraph endures because popular perception places both in very high esteem.  In that regard, the polygraph advocates have indeed been most successful.  :'( :(
What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security
and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac?   A great beginning!

The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!

Ex Member

#8
Quote from: George_Maschke on Feb 02, 2017, 03:17 AMbut there is considerable doubt about polygraphy's sensitivity as a lie test
Lying is more cognitively demanding than telling the truth. This, in most people, will generate some set of physiological reactions just as mental countermeasures do. But a slab of marble also contains the David, the trick is to remove the unwanted particles.

Wandersmann

#9
Quote from: Arkhangelsk on Feb 02, 2017, 08:50 AMLying is more cognitively demanding than telling the truth. This, in most people, will generate some set of physiological reactions just as mental countermeasures do. But a slab of marble also contains the David, the trick is to remove the unwanted particles.

This is the best analogy I've ever read pertaining to the polygraph and its abuse.  The frauds that profit from the polygraph don't even try to "remove the unwanted particles " because no one holds them accountable for proven failure of their scam.  The only thing more despicable than the polygraph community are the executive branch officials and congressmen who allow them to flourish. :-? :P

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last name of the first U.S. president?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview