Polygraph Operator William McCallister Arrested for Sexual Assault

[Bill_Brown]

Mr. McCallister,

You need to study law much more.  A decision by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals is dominant over Florida law and sets the precidence for admissibility.  I was informed that persons incarcerated for the amount of time you were incarcerated actually learned law and how decisions by the Appellate Courts and the Supreme Court affect all courts at law.  My mistake, I have furnished you with what you requested and you are not able to understand the significance of that decision.  It directly affects you in the State of Florida. 

A Florida Case is:

IN THE
 SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, CASE NO. SC96767, THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. F. LEE BAILEY,  Respondent.  This case is important to your case also.  It does not allow polygraph in this case but is interesting.  Look it up and read it. 

In New Mexico polygraph is admissible by New Mexico Supreme Court rule 707.  (Over any objections by the state or the defendant).  Texas has allowed polygraph in District Court also. 

I must say you are pompous and arrogant.  I will not offend you further by offering tools that may aid you in your quest to clear your name. 

[William McCallister]

To: Bill_Brown aka F. Lee Bailey, Johnny Cochran, Matlock or whoever you think you are...

You made a direct statement to me regarding polygraph results being admitted in State Courts over the objection by prosecutors.

All I ask is that you give me just one cite where that occurred. Specifically, In the State of Florida. Just because you say it's true doesn't necessairly mean so, right???

Stay on point Counselor!!!!!!

P.S. Boy! I'm glad you're not my attorney!!!

[William McCallister]

Mr. Brown,

It ain't much fun when the rabbit gets the gun! Understand?

[Bill_Brown]

Mr. McCallister,

You are 100% correct and i will refrain from further posts regarding your situation.  Have a good day.

[William McCallister]

Mr. Brown,

Thank-you kindly; you also have a nice day!

[lane99]

What a singularly repulsive fellow. 

Do you have anything more substantial to contribute to the discussion beyond a personal attack?

I consider it substantive to warn the public about sexual predators.  If you don't, we'll have to agree to disagree.

[William McCallister]

To: Lane99

I have never been convicted of any sexual crime. Therefore, your designation is incorrect.

Why don't you come out of the closet and identify yourself. You sound like one of the Florida Polygraph Association members that would like me to go away. Sorry Charlie!!!

[William McCallister]

To: Lane99

This is a perfect example of why detectives should polygraph potential victims of sexual assault.

If the alleged victim cannot pass the examination, the detectives should take safeguards to insure that all angles of the casefacts are investigated before making an arrest.

The last thing we want to do is falsely accuse an innocent person of commiting a sexual crime.

Example: **************************************

POLK COUNTY -- APRIL 14, 2012
A civilian employee with the Polk County Sheriff's Office was arrested after deputies say she lied about being sexually battered by her father.

Polk County Sheriff's Special Victims detectives arrested and charged 26-year-old Heather Johnson of Winter Haven with one count false reporting to law enforcement regarding a capital felony.

According to the affidavit, Johnson told detectives that when she was 5 years old, she was sexually battered by her biological father, and that she had not had contact with him since.

After conducting a full investigation and interviewing all parties involved, detectives again interviewed Johnson, who admitted she lied about what she had reported, according to the sheriff's office.

Johnson resigned immediately upon her arrest. She has been booked into the Polk County Jail. 

Before her arrest and resignation, Johnson was most recently assigned as a Telecommunications Shift Supervisor.

She originally worked for Polk County Fire/EMS as a dispatcher, and was hired in July 2010 as a PCSO Telecommunicator just prior to the joint Polk County Sheriff's Emergency Communications Center becoming operational.

[Sergeant1107]

To: Lane99

This is a perfect example of why detectives should polygraph potential victims of sexual assault.

If the alleged victim cannot pass the examination, the detectives should take safeguards to insure that all angles of the casefacts are investigated before making an arrest.

The last thing we want to do is falsely accuse an innocent person of commiting a sexual crime.

Example: **************************************

POLK COUNTY -- APRIL 14, 2012
A civilian employee with the Polk County Sheriff's Office was arrested after deputies say she lied about being sexually battered by her father.

Polk County Sheriff's Special Victims detectives arrested and charged 26-year-old Heather Johnson of Winter Haven with one count false reporting to law enforcement regarding a capital felony.

According to the affidavit, Johnson told detectives that when she was 5 years old, she was sexually battered by her biological father, and that she had not had contact with him since.

After conducting a full investigation and interviewing all parties involved, detectives again interviewed Johnson, who admitted she lied about what she had reported, according to the sheriff's office.

Johnson resigned immediately upon her arrest. She has been booked into the Polk County Jail. 

Before her arrest and resignation, Johnson was most recently assigned as a Telecommunications Shift Supervisor.

She originally worked for Polk County Fire/EMS as a dispatcher, and was hired in July 2010 as a PCSO Telecommunicator just prior to the joint Polk County Sheriff's Emergency Communications Center becoming operational.

This doesn't seem like an example of why victims should be polygraphed.  It seems like an excellent example of why investigations are superior to polygraphs.

If there is no evidence of sexual assault, why would the victim be polygraphed?  In order to pile on the trauma?  With no evidence other than a polygraph result the case will not go forward.

If there is evidence of sexual assault, why would the victim by polygraphed?  To further traumatize her? 

[William McCallister]

'au contraire mon frere'

Polygraph examinations, when used properly, can be a great investigative tool pointing the investigation in the right direction.

There doen't need to be any hard core interrogation, thus, keeping the alleged victim from further trama, if indeed; the allegation is true.

It can also keep an innocent person from being tramatized. Both parties are important. Truth should be exposed, and only guilty parties punished. That is what true justice and the exposure of truth means to me.

[Sergeant1107]

'au contraire mon frere'

Polygraph examinations, when used properly, can be a great investigative tool pointing the investigation in the right direction.

There doen't need to be any hard core interrogation, thus, keeping the alleged victim from further trama, if indeed; the allegation is true.

It can also keep an innocent person from being tramatized. Both parties are important. Truth should be exposed, and only guilty parties punished. That is what true justice and the exposure of truth means to me.

If you don't induce or elicit some degree of stress, can you run an effective polygraph?

Why is it a good idea to stress the victim of a sexual assault?

If there is evidence the victim is manufacturing a story in order to victimize someone else, then they have become the subject of an investigation themselves and could certainly be polygraphed.  If there is no evidence of such fabrication, why would you stress and re-victimize a victim of a sexual assault?

[William McCallister]

When there is evidence the victim is manufacturing or confabulating a story, regarding the suspect, then ask them to take a polygraph.  If there is no evidence of this, then absolutely do not stress, tramatize and re-victimize any sexual assault victim. I certainly would not.

But, if there is well-founded suspicion that the victim is not being truthful about the alleged sexual assault a more indepth investigation is demanded and expected to ensure justice. Especially, when the suspect is adamant the sexual assault did not happen.

If the suspect lawyers up you can't test them. If this happens, ask the other party (alleged victim) "could you pass a polygraph examination regarding this complaint?" Usually, the person will say "yes".

You should not make anyone feel that you do not believe them unless you have additional proofs, post-test. There should be no interrogation before administering the test.  The polygraph should only be used in cases where victim and suspect tell different stories. He said, She said.

Since the 5th amendment of the US Constitution protects suspects from making self incriminating statements, no intimidation or threats should ever be used. Attorneys sometime have their client tested privately then release results, if they exonerate the client.

In any event, the polygraph should never be used as a scare tactic, on anyone, period. It should only be used to point the investigation in the right direction.

Due to recent changes in Florida law.  The victim of sexual assault cannot be requested to take a polygraph test.  Therefore, unless you have physical evidence, it is often difficult to determine the truth.   

[William McCallister]

2007 New Florida Law Revision
House Bill 989 (Ch. 2007-129): Victims; Sexual Offenses; Polygraph; HIV; Courts; Forensic Physical Examinations; Attorney General

Per revisions to F.S. 960.001, provides that no alleged victim of a sexual battery shall be required to take a polygraph examination or other truth-telling device as a condition of proceeding with an investigation.  Such a refusal by the alleged victim shall not preclude further investigation of the alleged offence.  IN addition, new language in the same section provides that upon request by the victim or the victim's parent, guardian, or lawful representative, a victim advocate shall be present at the forensic examination of the alleged victim.  A change to F.S. 960.28 requires that the initial forensic examination of the alleged victim shall be paid for by the Crime Vicitim's Services Office of the Attorney General.  Also amends F.S. 960.003 to require that, upon court order, any person charged with certain offenses involving the transmission of bodily fluids shall undergo HIV testing within 48 hours of such court order.

Effective Date: July 1, 2007.

[William McCallister]

According to the language in this law.  You can request but not require the alleged victim, of a sexual battery, to submit to polygraph testing.

[unknown user]

they live at 510 farrington way orlando fl 32837

ATTENTION NEW YORK AREA!!!

I am seeking information regarding a physical and/or sexual child abuse case that occured in the New York Area. The victim is possibly two (2) years of age.   Possibly in the Astoria or Bellerose (Queens County) New York area. This information was developed from a family member. Between  1993 - 2005. The suspects are:

Husband & Wfe:
Zamela Balbhadr Jambard, Age 47
Seeram Matadial, age 43
The currently reside in Orlando, Florida.

Anyone with information, please respond to:

William L. McCallister
President
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
Winter Haven, FL 33880
863-299-9424
floridapolygraph@comcast.net