Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by wombat
 - Jun 23, 2003, 07:15 AM
George,

thanx.

Saidme,

im haveing trouble figuring you out. on one had you claim not to know any thing about pre job poly's. on the other hand you are totaly convinced im ooooozzzzziiiiiinnnnggggg with guilt.
i never said i was not guilty of something. i am. im just doing my homework.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jun 23, 2003, 03:45 AM
Wombat,

You appear to have correctly understood the section on R/I countermeasures.
Posted by Saidme
 - Jun 22, 2003, 08:50 PM
ooooooooozzzzzzzzzzziiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnngggggggggg. ;)
Posted by wombat
 - Jun 22, 2003, 08:48 PM
from what i have read in the LBTLD to use CM's in a R/I test, i need to produce "erratic" results on the relevant questions? am i correct?
from what i understand i dont do any thing with the irrelevants (like in a CQT), but unlike the CQT were i leave the Relevants alone. in a R/I i am supposed to produce a "high" on a couple of topics in chart 1. and then in chart 2 produce a "high" in two other topics. (so that there wont be a con-spec-nificant chart) correct?
and of course if there is a stim test or a couple of controls at the begining or end of the test
"peak" them.
im i right?