- Welcome to AntiPolygraph.org Message Board.
A forum for free and open discussion of polygraph-related topics
Posted by Mandee
- Nov 24, 2010, 01:43 AMi like xxx's posts.... 
Posted by Skeptic
- Feb 24, 2003, 09:40 PMQuote from: Auntie Polly on Feb 24, 2003, 09:04 AM
I have a question for anyone who might be able to tell me.
Is there a way to put Michelle on ignore? I fear she suffers from OCD when it come to this forum.
Thanks,
Auntie Polly
Yep. You look for the word "Michelle" (or "Batman", or "Skeptic", etc.) in the left hand column, and ignore what's to the right of it.
Skeptic
Posted by steincj
- Feb 24, 2003, 08:53 PMQuote from: Auntie Polly on Feb 24, 2003, 09:04 AM
I have a question for anyone who might be able to tell me.
Is there a way to put Michelle on ignore?
Auntie Polly
I have a suggestion, Auntie Polly. Take after Batman, Torpedo, and the other pro-polys on this board, and live your life with your head up your ass. This way you won't have to see or hear anything anyone says.
Michelle can say whatever she wants (as can you), thanks to our blessed First Amendment. Whether you choose to listen is your freedom as well. Michelle chooses to drown out the incomprehensible voice of the troll (Batman). You choose to be an idiot.
Ahhh, freedom.
Chris
Posted by Auntie Polly
- Feb 24, 2003, 09:04 AMI have a question for anyone who might be able to tell me.
Quote from: Michelle on Feb 23, 2003, 04:09 PM
I post regularly on a message board in a different forum and usually I put the trolls on ignore
Is there a way to put Michelle on ignore? I fear she suffers from OCD when it come to this forum.
Thanks,
Auntie Polly
Posted by Michelle
- Feb 23, 2003, 04:09 PMQuote from: x_X_x on Feb 21, 2003, 01:43 AM
You disgust and insult most all non-polygraph supporters on this board. And you are singularly incapable of posting without rallying and calling for all your "yes-men" to support your claim to fame, and pile-on..
While he certainly does disgust the normals on this board it is more than amusing to watch him run as fast as his little paws will take him when it is demonstrated that he lost a debate. Notice how quiet he became when he had his comrads post in his place after losing his own wager?
His "good money on wagers" is a farce, his inability to admit an error, his absolute refusal to behave like an adult while making wild accusations about anyone that doesn't buy into his silly polygraph crappola ... well, I admit I enjoy watching it. It's a bit like watching a puppy chase his tail. He thinks that by running in circles faster and faster will afford him his ultimate goal.
Quote
Try an independent post for once; that would truly amaze me, as well as many others on this board.
Not going to happen.
Quote
Your turn batshit, write your post, be sure to rally all your supporters, and pile-on with your cyber high-5'ing so the rest of us can sit back and be amused... Ha!!!.
Also known as dog piling. Ineffective but sometimes it is all he has.
I post regularly on a message board in a different forum and usually I put the trolls on ignore but this one has started amusing me in an entertainment sort of fashion and besides, whether or not I like to admit it the troll here does teach me something. The more I read of his posts the more I realize that a polygraph has as much validity as flipping a coin to determine honesty vs. dishonesty.
Posted by triple x
- Feb 22, 2003, 12:34 AMBatman,
[you write]
"You have lost all credilbility with me."
When did I ever have any credibility with you in the first place Batman; for you to proudly claim now that I have lost it? Also, you misspelled credibility... although you do show improvement.
Thanks for the hot tip on "not shaking" the magic 8-ball. Please understand, I did not have a magic 8-ball as a child growing up, nor do I use one currently to aide my profession.
Perhaps this magic 8-ball is precisely what sparked your interest during your childhood to become a polygraph examiner... After all, they both [polygraph/magic 8-ball] constitute the same chance-accuracy when comparing "chart gazing" to determine truth from deception, verses using the magic 8-ball to establish yes/no answers to the same questions when asked independently.
That definitely would explain your obvious frustration with me not knowing how to properly use the magic 8-ball. I now have a better understanding of your thought process.
We are making great strides in progress here Batman with our combined and noteworthy efforts in analyzing one another's individual shortcomings, mental capacities and flawed personal characteristics.
I would like to see us move in a positive direction, and work toward a resolve in our opposing differences. Lets try and debate our opposing opinions and views as the true polygraph examiner community statesman and ambassador you are.
Lets end this charade, and discuss/debate how I passed an FBI pre-employment polygraph exam with flying colors. The polygraph examiner told me that I did fine, yet I was informed the following week via phone, that I was "suspected" of employing polygraph countermeasures by the FBI DC polygraph lab.
That's what brought me to this website Batman, and that's what keeps bringing me back time and again. I now speak out against polygraph testing because I do not feel it is reliable. I further feel that it is fallible, and can be beat with polygraph countermeasures if employed correctly.
What do you say Batman, ready for a change in direction here...??
As you previously remarked crusader; the cat is out of the bag...
Triple X
[you write]
"You have lost all credilbility with me."
When did I ever have any credibility with you in the first place Batman; for you to proudly claim now that I have lost it? Also, you misspelled credibility... although you do show improvement.
Thanks for the hot tip on "not shaking" the magic 8-ball. Please understand, I did not have a magic 8-ball as a child growing up, nor do I use one currently to aide my profession.
Perhaps this magic 8-ball is precisely what sparked your interest during your childhood to become a polygraph examiner... After all, they both [polygraph/magic 8-ball] constitute the same chance-accuracy when comparing "chart gazing" to determine truth from deception, verses using the magic 8-ball to establish yes/no answers to the same questions when asked independently.
That definitely would explain your obvious frustration with me not knowing how to properly use the magic 8-ball. I now have a better understanding of your thought process.
We are making great strides in progress here Batman with our combined and noteworthy efforts in analyzing one another's individual shortcomings, mental capacities and flawed personal characteristics.
I would like to see us move in a positive direction, and work toward a resolve in our opposing differences. Lets try and debate our opposing opinions and views as the true polygraph examiner community statesman and ambassador you are.
Lets end this charade, and discuss/debate how I passed an FBI pre-employment polygraph exam with flying colors. The polygraph examiner told me that I did fine, yet I was informed the following week via phone, that I was "suspected" of employing polygraph countermeasures by the FBI DC polygraph lab.
That's what brought me to this website Batman, and that's what keeps bringing me back time and again. I now speak out against polygraph testing because I do not feel it is reliable. I further feel that it is fallible, and can be beat with polygraph countermeasures if employed correctly.
What do you say Batman, ready for a change in direction here...??
As you previously remarked crusader; the cat is out of the bag...
Triple X
Posted by Batman
- Feb 21, 2003, 05:27 PMTriple X,
You must be the dumbest bastard on this site! Everyone knows that a polygraph examiner does not shake the 8-Ball. Hell, if you shake the 8-Ball it creates bubbles and you can't read the answer. You slowly rotate the 8-Ball in your hand, with your eyes closed of course. It's all in the wrist! Ain't that right George?
Shake the 8-Ball, geese, you are stupid! You have lost all credilbility with me. I was just beginning to think you might be a hard core SF killer, but now you've let the cat out of the bag.
Shake the 8-Ball! Shake this!
Batman
You must be the dumbest bastard on this site! Everyone knows that a polygraph examiner does not shake the 8-Ball. Hell, if you shake the 8-Ball it creates bubbles and you can't read the answer. You slowly rotate the 8-Ball in your hand, with your eyes closed of course. It's all in the wrist! Ain't that right George?
Shake the 8-Ball, geese, you are stupid! You have lost all credilbility with me. I was just beginning to think you might be a hard core SF killer, but now you've let the cat out of the bag.
Shake the 8-Ball! Shake this!
Batman
Posted by triple x
- Feb 21, 2003, 01:43 AMVato,
You started the SF debate with:
Vato
Guest
Re: Polygraph testing; « Reply #3 on: 02/16/03 at 18:48:22 »
"When did you go through SFAS?"
I too, hope this will be my last post regarding this topic as well. Actually, I further hope this will be my last post to you period. The readers on this board are without question, tired of reading this meaningless thread. And quite frankly, I don't blame them. I'm sick of debating the entire SF saga with you. Let it go. If you don't believe what I post, fine. Why not contain your personal sarcasm, and simply dismiss the post. Rather, you prefer to respond with personal insults, sarcasm and rudeness, resulting in a continuing response and meaningless never ending thread.
First off; if you would read your on link provided within your previous post, you will clearly read that SFAS is currently a 24 day course:
[Vato wrote]
"If you follow this link to the JFK Special Warfare Center http://www.soc.mil/swcs/Pipeline.shtml, you'll see that you are clearly in error as to the duration of the SFAS as well as the "Q" course."
[Copy & paste from your own referenced link]
"Phase I: Special Forces Assessment and Selection (SFAS): 24 days"
The last time I checked, a 24-day course is 3 weeks in duration.
With respect to the SFQC course, 21 years ago, [1982] the basic SFQC course excluding additional MOS skill training [not part of the basic "Q" course] was a three-week basic course. Present day, I suspect it is still close to 3-weeks, although it may have extended in duration over 21 years. Not sure, don't care.
Unlike you, I'm not going to waste my time searching via "Yahoo" to try and find out. Please understand my position here ese Vato; I don't really care if its 3-weeks, 3-months, or 3-years. I have already successfully completed the course, and could care less what you think. I'm certain that you will try to impress your avid supporters with your typical "unsupported" response. You blatantly discredit yourself further with each succeeding post. Only this time, be sure and "proof read" your own referenced material for a supporting argument, when suggesting we read your provided link. Ha!
[ese Vato also wrote]
"Maybe you should go back to reading Tom Clancy and Marcinko novels."
I have never read a single Richard "Dick" Marcinko novel, nor do I like or read Tom Clancy novels. However, I appreciate your recommended source reading material. Do you also recommend the National Enquirer magazine? Sounds to me as though it would be more in-line with your intellect.
[ese Vato again wrote]
"I'll let the readers come to their own conclusions about your stated qualifications."
I have never stated any of my qualifications on this board. Where do you arrive at this? Again, you are misstating something you did not fully comprehend. You should seriously consider some basic adult reading comprehension improvement classes. Remedial reading education courses for adults are very beneficial, helpful and affordable.
[ese Vato continues to write]
"The members of the Special Forces are called "quiet professionals" for a reason."
Agreed, and your point is..??
Are you suggesting that my admission to a couple of Army courses over 21 years ago is some type of a threat to National Security, or giving away some type of secret.? It's not like I'm posting any classified information, or actual "real-world-events". Be realistic ese, you can do better than that.
Vato, you should quit embarrassing yourself any further. You respond to my post with a referenced link of you own, that supports my very position. You probably found the link you referenced via Yahoo search engine. You tell me to read your referenced link, and it completely supports my argument to within a couple of days.
Vato, you're an Idiot.
Torpedo:
[You write]
"Vato...I have this feeling thaty you have hit the nail on the head. Triple X (odd name don't you think) seems to enjoy lengthy posts to demonstrate his knowledge about certain topics. "
You point out that my board identity "xxx" is an odd name, agreed. Fair enough, however, I assume "Torpedo" is a far superior board name?
What is your point here Torpedo? Are we now rating board member identities? If you are suggesting it is representative of the movie "XXX", [some assume it is] I assure you it is not, nor have I viewed the movie. I also received a private message from a board member asking me if I was into xxx porn... again, not so; and has nothing to do with my board identity. Since when is board names an issue.? I simply picked it at random.
Torpedo, you made reference to my post(s) being "lengthy" to appear knowledgeable about certain topics, not the case at all.
I do not consider my post(s) any lengthier than many others on this board, and not as long as some. I simply try to make my point and position clear.
Batman:
You are totally incapable of posting an independent post on your own. You are quick to rally and call out to your supporters such as "Green Lantern (Torpedo) and Vato" just to name a few, to rally behind and pile-on to help support your claim.
You guys get-off on "cyber" high-5'ing each other, in support of one another. batshit, you simply can't post a single debate without calling-out for "requesting" support from your cronies.
{batshit wrote]
"I called him out on his Special Forces line in a different thread about 2/3 weeks ago."
When and where do you interpret "calling me out".? If you're referring to your previous post regarding your suspicions of me being a "logistics or supply puke", you have to be kidding... If that's "calling someone out" in your own mind, then your very weak minded.
[batshit writes again]
"Vato, funny you should tell him to go back to reading Marchinko (I'm probably misspelling his name because I never read his crap), because I told him he was reading too much Marchinko."
Your correct here batshit, you did spell it wrong. For the record, the correct spelling is Richard "Marcinko", not [Marchinko] as you suspected. In this rare case, to your defense, you suspected you may have spelled Marcinko wrong; and amazingly, you were correct in your suspicions. Having said that, I have never read any of his books; although I am smart enough to know who he is, what he represents, and how to "properly" spell his name. Its not exactly rocket science, we're talking about basic elementary spelling.
I thought you polygraph pukes were college degreed and educated in the basic disciplines. However, I laugh at the thought...
[batshit writes yet again]
"I'm convinced he's simply a tag-a-long, or back office puke who maybe sat through the courses to audit them, but never actually went through them."
batshit, I'm flattered that you put me in the same category with a simple "tag-a-long, or back office puke".
[batshit says]
"He's a classic example of how a little bit of knowledge and training is just enough to get you killed."
You may actually be on to something here batshit...
You and your supporters are pathetic. I personally find it appalling that you represent the polygraph community, and possess the ability as a "chart-gazer" to ruin people's lives and career ambitions.
I sure hope you are better at "guessing" at polygraph chart results, than trying to guess at my previous military experience and background. You don't have a clue with respect to my past military experience, no more than you have a clue with chart-gazing... Tell us batshit, how do you really do it, do you shake your magic 8-ball, and rely on the answer.?
You disgust and insult most all non-polygraph supporters on this board. And you are singularly incapable of posting without rallying and calling for all your "yes-men" to support your claim to fame, and pile-on..
Try an independent post for once; that would truly amaze me, as well as many others on this board.
Your turn batshit, write your post, be sure to rally all your supporters, and pile-on with your cyber high-5'ing so the rest of us can sit back and be amused... Ha!!!.
Triple_x
You started the SF debate with:
Vato
Guest
Re: Polygraph testing; « Reply #3 on: 02/16/03 at 18:48:22 »
"When did you go through SFAS?"
I too, hope this will be my last post regarding this topic as well. Actually, I further hope this will be my last post to you period. The readers on this board are without question, tired of reading this meaningless thread. And quite frankly, I don't blame them. I'm sick of debating the entire SF saga with you. Let it go. If you don't believe what I post, fine. Why not contain your personal sarcasm, and simply dismiss the post. Rather, you prefer to respond with personal insults, sarcasm and rudeness, resulting in a continuing response and meaningless never ending thread.
First off; if you would read your on link provided within your previous post, you will clearly read that SFAS is currently a 24 day course:
[Vato wrote]
"If you follow this link to the JFK Special Warfare Center http://www.soc.mil/swcs/Pipeline.shtml, you'll see that you are clearly in error as to the duration of the SFAS as well as the "Q" course."
[Copy & paste from your own referenced link]
"Phase I: Special Forces Assessment and Selection (SFAS): 24 days"
The last time I checked, a 24-day course is 3 weeks in duration.
With respect to the SFQC course, 21 years ago, [1982] the basic SFQC course excluding additional MOS skill training [not part of the basic "Q" course] was a three-week basic course. Present day, I suspect it is still close to 3-weeks, although it may have extended in duration over 21 years. Not sure, don't care.
Unlike you, I'm not going to waste my time searching via "Yahoo" to try and find out. Please understand my position here ese Vato; I don't really care if its 3-weeks, 3-months, or 3-years. I have already successfully completed the course, and could care less what you think. I'm certain that you will try to impress your avid supporters with your typical "unsupported" response. You blatantly discredit yourself further with each succeeding post. Only this time, be sure and "proof read" your own referenced material for a supporting argument, when suggesting we read your provided link. Ha!
[ese Vato also wrote]
"Maybe you should go back to reading Tom Clancy and Marcinko novels."
I have never read a single Richard "Dick" Marcinko novel, nor do I like or read Tom Clancy novels. However, I appreciate your recommended source reading material. Do you also recommend the National Enquirer magazine? Sounds to me as though it would be more in-line with your intellect.
[ese Vato again wrote]
"I'll let the readers come to their own conclusions about your stated qualifications."
I have never stated any of my qualifications on this board. Where do you arrive at this? Again, you are misstating something you did not fully comprehend. You should seriously consider some basic adult reading comprehension improvement classes. Remedial reading education courses for adults are very beneficial, helpful and affordable.
[ese Vato continues to write]
"The members of the Special Forces are called "quiet professionals" for a reason."
Agreed, and your point is..??
Are you suggesting that my admission to a couple of Army courses over 21 years ago is some type of a threat to National Security, or giving away some type of secret.? It's not like I'm posting any classified information, or actual "real-world-events". Be realistic ese, you can do better than that.
Vato, you should quit embarrassing yourself any further. You respond to my post with a referenced link of you own, that supports my very position. You probably found the link you referenced via Yahoo search engine. You tell me to read your referenced link, and it completely supports my argument to within a couple of days.
Vato, you're an Idiot.
Torpedo:
[You write]
"Vato...I have this feeling thaty you have hit the nail on the head. Triple X (odd name don't you think) seems to enjoy lengthy posts to demonstrate his knowledge about certain topics. "
You point out that my board identity "xxx" is an odd name, agreed. Fair enough, however, I assume "Torpedo" is a far superior board name?
What is your point here Torpedo? Are we now rating board member identities? If you are suggesting it is representative of the movie "XXX", [some assume it is] I assure you it is not, nor have I viewed the movie. I also received a private message from a board member asking me if I was into xxx porn... again, not so; and has nothing to do with my board identity. Since when is board names an issue.? I simply picked it at random.
Torpedo, you made reference to my post(s) being "lengthy" to appear knowledgeable about certain topics, not the case at all.
I do not consider my post(s) any lengthier than many others on this board, and not as long as some. I simply try to make my point and position clear.
Batman:
You are totally incapable of posting an independent post on your own. You are quick to rally and call out to your supporters such as "Green Lantern (Torpedo) and Vato" just to name a few, to rally behind and pile-on to help support your claim.
You guys get-off on "cyber" high-5'ing each other, in support of one another. batshit, you simply can't post a single debate without calling-out for "requesting" support from your cronies.
{batshit wrote]
"I called him out on his Special Forces line in a different thread about 2/3 weeks ago."
When and where do you interpret "calling me out".? If you're referring to your previous post regarding your suspicions of me being a "logistics or supply puke", you have to be kidding... If that's "calling someone out" in your own mind, then your very weak minded.
[batshit writes again]
"Vato, funny you should tell him to go back to reading Marchinko (I'm probably misspelling his name because I never read his crap), because I told him he was reading too much Marchinko."
Your correct here batshit, you did spell it wrong. For the record, the correct spelling is Richard "Marcinko", not [Marchinko] as you suspected. In this rare case, to your defense, you suspected you may have spelled Marcinko wrong; and amazingly, you were correct in your suspicions. Having said that, I have never read any of his books; although I am smart enough to know who he is, what he represents, and how to "properly" spell his name. Its not exactly rocket science, we're talking about basic elementary spelling.
I thought you polygraph pukes were college degreed and educated in the basic disciplines. However, I laugh at the thought...
[batshit writes yet again]
"I'm convinced he's simply a tag-a-long, or back office puke who maybe sat through the courses to audit them, but never actually went through them."
batshit, I'm flattered that you put me in the same category with a simple "tag-a-long, or back office puke".
[batshit says]
"He's a classic example of how a little bit of knowledge and training is just enough to get you killed."
You may actually be on to something here batshit...
You and your supporters are pathetic. I personally find it appalling that you represent the polygraph community, and possess the ability as a "chart-gazer" to ruin people's lives and career ambitions.
I sure hope you are better at "guessing" at polygraph chart results, than trying to guess at my previous military experience and background. You don't have a clue with respect to my past military experience, no more than you have a clue with chart-gazing... Tell us batshit, how do you really do it, do you shake your magic 8-ball, and rely on the answer.?
You disgust and insult most all non-polygraph supporters on this board. And you are singularly incapable of posting without rallying and calling for all your "yes-men" to support your claim to fame, and pile-on..
Try an independent post for once; that would truly amaze me, as well as many others on this board.
Your turn batshit, write your post, be sure to rally all your supporters, and pile-on with your cyber high-5'ing so the rest of us can sit back and be amused... Ha!!!.
Triple_x
Posted by Batman
- Feb 19, 2003, 04:26 PMGreen Lantern (Torpedo) and Vato,
Glad to see I'm not the only one who saw through Triple X's line of bullshit. I called him out on his Special Forces line in a different thread about 2/3 weeks ago.
Vato, funny you should tell him to go back to reading Marchinko (I'm probably misspelling his name because I never read his crap), because I told him he was reading too much Marchinko.
I'm convinced he's simply a tag-a-long, or back office puke who maybe sat through the courses to audit them, but never actually went through them.
He's a classic example of how a little bit of knowledge and training is just enough to get you killed.
Batman
Glad to see I'm not the only one who saw through Triple X's line of bullshit. I called him out on his Special Forces line in a different thread about 2/3 weeks ago.
Vato, funny you should tell him to go back to reading Marchinko (I'm probably misspelling his name because I never read his crap), because I told him he was reading too much Marchinko.
I'm convinced he's simply a tag-a-long, or back office puke who maybe sat through the courses to audit them, but never actually went through them.
He's a classic example of how a little bit of knowledge and training is just enough to get you killed.
Batman
Posted by Torpedo
- Feb 19, 2003, 12:07 PMVato...I have this feeling thaty you have hit the nail on the head. Triple X (odd name don't you think) seems to enjoy lengthy posts to demonstrate his knowledge about certain topics. True enough, I erred by transposing the letters NSA with NAS, but I would think that there is little doubt that he was excluding NSA from the DoD...indicating to me that his organizational knowledge is lacking....or...made up??? In case you missed it...this was his statement:
"The Department of Defense (DOD) uses the polygraph more than any other federal agency except the CIA and the National Security Agency (NSA)."
Is there any doubt in your mind?..Take care my friend, the Justice League would welcome your presence if you so desire!
"The Department of Defense (DOD) uses the polygraph more than any other federal agency except the CIA and the National Security Agency (NSA)."
Is there any doubt in your mind?..Take care my friend, the Justice League would welcome your presence if you so desire!
Posted by Vato
- Feb 19, 2003, 11:01 AMHopefully, this will be my last post on this subject as I have no desire to further debate you. I'll let the readers come to their own conclusions about your stated qualifications.
If you follow this link to the JFK Special Warfare Center http://www.soc.mil/swcs/Pipeline.shtml, you'll see that you are clearly in error as to the duration of the SFAS as well as the "Q" course. A mistake as basic as this indicates to me that the source of your information isn't firsthand. Maybe you should go back to reading Tom Clancy and Marcinko novels.
The members of the Special Forces are called "quiet professionals" for a reason.
If you follow this link to the JFK Special Warfare Center http://www.soc.mil/swcs/Pipeline.shtml, you'll see that you are clearly in error as to the duration of the SFAS as well as the "Q" course. A mistake as basic as this indicates to me that the source of your information isn't firsthand. Maybe you should go back to reading Tom Clancy and Marcinko novels.
The members of the Special Forces are called "quiet professionals" for a reason.
Posted by triple x
- Feb 19, 2003, 12:26 AMVato,
* My statement regarding air assault school was simply a "matter of speech".
* I successfully completed/graduated both SFAS/SFQC courses.
* You put emphasis on air assault school "only" being a nine-day course.
* SFAS and SFQC courses are "only" three (3) week courses.
* Air assault school is a two-week course. [Not a significant difference.]
* There is merely a one-week difference between the duration of said courses.
My personal opinion obviously differs with that of yours. However, perhaps we simply perceive specific aspects of the referenced SF courses somewhat differently; and I don't have a problem with that.
Strictly in my opinion, the SFAS/SFQC course(s) were more mentally challenging, Air Assault School was simply more physically challenging.
Regards,
x
* My statement regarding air assault school was simply a "matter of speech".
* I successfully completed/graduated both SFAS/SFQC courses.
* You put emphasis on air assault school "only" being a nine-day course.
* SFAS and SFQC courses are "only" three (3) week courses.
* Air assault school is a two-week course. [Not a significant difference.]
* There is merely a one-week difference between the duration of said courses.
My personal opinion obviously differs with that of yours. However, perhaps we simply perceive specific aspects of the referenced SF courses somewhat differently; and I don't have a problem with that.
Strictly in my opinion, the SFAS/SFQC course(s) were more mentally challenging, Air Assault School was simply more physically challenging.
Regards,
x
Posted by Vato
- Feb 18, 2003, 05:26 PMQuoteStrictly in my opinion; Air Assault school, (11-day course) then taught at Ft. Rucker, AL is superior to either of the SFAS and/or SFQC courses.
You must be kidding! Nine days (zero day doesn't count) of getting yelled at followed by a 12 mile stroll on the tenth day pales in comparison to SFAS or the "Q" course.
I notice that you said that you attended the assesment and selection course, not that you completed it. Are we to assume that you weren't selected for further training? Not that there's any shame in that, most people couldn't pass the PT test required to enter the course.
Posted by triple x
- Feb 17, 2003, 12:06 AMVato,
I attended the 3-week SFAS course at Fort Bragg, NC in 1982.
Following jump school at Ft. Benning, GA I was selected to attend the (SFAS) Special Forces Assessment and Selection course at Ft. Bragg, NC.
As you know, [others may not] SFAS is basically designed to select the best within a class of SF candidates who will then move on to the next level, (SFQC) Special Forces Qualification Course also at Fort Bragg. As with any SF candidate, final selection and assignment into an elite Special Forces Unit, now called (SOGS) "Special Operations Groups" depends on successful completion of the (SFAS) Special Forces Assessment and Selection process, as well as the (SFQC) Special Forces Qualification Course.
Strictly in my opinion; Air Assault school, (11-day course) then taught at Ft. Rucker, AL is superior to either of the SFAS and/or SFQC courses.
Vato; I assume by your knowledge of SFAS SF courses, you also have a background in SF's.?
Respectfully,
triple_x
I attended the 3-week SFAS course at Fort Bragg, NC in 1982.
Following jump school at Ft. Benning, GA I was selected to attend the (SFAS) Special Forces Assessment and Selection course at Ft. Bragg, NC.
As you know, [others may not] SFAS is basically designed to select the best within a class of SF candidates who will then move on to the next level, (SFQC) Special Forces Qualification Course also at Fort Bragg. As with any SF candidate, final selection and assignment into an elite Special Forces Unit, now called (SOGS) "Special Operations Groups" depends on successful completion of the (SFAS) Special Forces Assessment and Selection process, as well as the (SFQC) Special Forces Qualification Course.
Strictly in my opinion; Air Assault school, (11-day course) then taught at Ft. Rucker, AL is superior to either of the SFAS and/or SFQC courses.
Vato; I assume by your knowledge of SFAS SF courses, you also have a background in SF's.?
Respectfully,
triple_x
Posted by Vato
- Feb 16, 2003, 09:48 PMWhen did you go through SFAS?