Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Feb 23, 2003, 06:03 AM
Triple X,

The Comprehensive Employee Polygraph Protection Act, if enacted, would require option "a," but in practice, I suspect that some agencies would implement option "c," which would result in litigation.
Posted by triple x
 - Feb 22, 2003, 08:31 PM
Theoretical and/or Hypothetical question:

I have often pondered what the policy might be "hypothetically" speaking, should pre-employment polygraph testing ever be banned completely with all Federal/State/LE agencies.

Question:
Anyone who has previously failed a "Federal", State, County, or Law Enforcement pre-employment polygraph test...

a) Could re-apply, and would be equally and fairly considered for employment with the same agency previously applied with, which resulted in a failed polygraph exam?
b) Could NOT re-apply due to a previously failed pre-employment polygraph exam on file?
c) Could re-apply, but would be unfairly discriminated against due to a failed pre-employment polygraph exam on file?
d) None of the above?


Your thoughts, comments or concerns...


Respectfully
Triple_x