Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Doug Williams
 - Jan 06, 2020, 05:36 PM
Quote from: Doug_Williams on Dec 31, 2019, 04:55 AM
Quote from: Doug_Williams on Dec 29, 2019, 03:02 PMJust got word that everyone should LIE to pass the CIA poly.  Seriously, don't tell them anything.  Three people just EOD'd with NCS and the DI within CIA and they lied to pass their poly.  The poly is still part of the 3-day session at Dulles Discovery in Chantilly, VA. The CIA still uses the relevant/irrelevant test, and you should just use mental countermeasures on different relevant questions to randomly "spike" your charts.  When they ask you questions about drug use, crime, foreign contacts, lying, etc., just answer "NO".  Do not give them any minor info.  They will interrogate you, accuse you of lying and hiding stuff, but so what, just go with it.  One guy just got EOD'd and was able to hide the fact that the police came to his house recently for him beating up his girlfriend, but no arrests and no charges were made so there is no record that the CIA will check.  Some will say this is bad and this guy should not be CIA, but that is not the point, the point is this proves the fallacies of the poly if criminals can lie and beat it.  So, everyone, don't confess, don't admit to anything not on file (which means LIE), and use mental countermeasures only because those cannot be detected.

You know, I've been saying that for over 40 years now, and it's absolutely true. Be careful with this – the thugs and charlatans in the US federal government polygraph industry threw me in prison for two years for saying basically this very same thing to an undercover federal agent. Not only was I imprisoned, but my business of training people how to pass a polygraph test was shut down for five years. And I'm still waiting for another six months plus before I can start it back up again.

Well this is my response to the travesty of OPERATION LIE BUSTERS. Check it out and let me know what you think: http://operationliebusters.com/
Posted by Doug Williams
 - Dec 31, 2019, 04:55 AM
Quote from: Doug_Williams on Dec 29, 2019, 03:02 PMJust got word that everyone should LIE to pass the CIA poly.  Seriously, don't tell them anything.  Three people just EOD'd with NCS and the DI within CIA and they lied to pass their poly.  The poly is still part of the 3-day session at Dulles Discovery in Chantilly, VA. The CIA still uses the relevant/irrelevant test, and you should just use mental countermeasures on different relevant questions to randomly "spike" your charts.  When they ask you questions about drug use, crime, foreign contacts, lying, etc., just answer "NO".  Do not give them any minor info.  They will interrogate you, accuse you of lying and hiding stuff, but so what, just go with it.  One guy just got EOD'd and was able to hide the fact that the police came to his house recently for him beating up his girlfriend, but no arrests and no charges were made so there is no record that the CIA will check.  Some will say this is bad and this guy should not be CIA, but that is not the point, the point is this proves the fallacies of the poly if criminals can lie and beat it.  So, everyone, don't confess, don't admit to anything not on file (which means LIE), and use mental countermeasures only because those cannot be detected.

You know, I've been saying that for over 40 years now, and it's absolutely true. Be careful with this – the thugs and charlatans in the US federal government polygraph industry threw me in prison for two years for saying basically this very same thing to an undercover federal agent. Not only was I imprisoned, but my business of training people how to pass a polygraph test was shut down for five years. And I'm still waiting for another six months plus before I can start it back up again.
Posted by beat_the_system
 - Dec 29, 2019, 03:02 PM
Just got word that everyone should LIE to pass the CIA poly.  Seriously, don't tell them anything.  Three people just EOD'd with NCS and the DI within CIA and they lied to pass their poly.  The poly is still part of the 3-day session at Dulles Discovery in Chantilly, VA. The CIA still uses the relevant/irrelevant test, and you should just use mental countermeasures on different relevant questions to randomly "spike" your charts.  When they ask you questions about drug use, crime, foreign contacts, lying, etc., just answer "NO".  Do not give them any minor info.  They will interrogate you, accuse you of lying and hiding stuff, but so what, just go with it.  One guy just got EOD'd and was able to hide the fact that the police came to his house recently for him beating up his girlfriend, but no arrests and no charges were made so there is no record that the CIA will check.  Some will say this is bad and this guy should not be CIA, but that is not the point, the point is this proves the fallacies of the poly if criminals can lie and beat it.  So, everyone, don't confess, don't admit to anything not on file (which means LIE), and use mental countermeasures only because those cannot be detected.
Posted by anotherpolygraphvictim
 - Apr 03, 2019, 12:27 PM
Posted by Doug Williams
 - Nov 01, 2018, 07:20 AM
 How long must those who have simply applied for a job with the federal government (or applied for a position with the local police department) endure the preemployment polygraph screening test. This is an absurd procedure that is based on a faulty scientific premise – in fact it is pure pseudo science – and the government knows very well the test can be manipulated very easily so as to allow a liar to produce a perfect truthful chart regardless of whether he or she is lying or not. The government admitted this when they prosecuted me for teaching people how to do just that. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N3fHkCFxgQQ&feature=youtu.be
Posted by Trump2020
 - Oct 31, 2018, 11:32 AM
A user named Someguy0 on the federalsoup.com forum was recently banned and had his posts removed for posting the latest FBI polygraph questions.  I was able to find the Google cache of the page, which used to be at https://forum.federalsoup.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=901948, and here is a copy and paste of Someguy0's deleted post:


-----------------------------------------


As we all know or can find out from a Google search, the CIA conducts their pre-employment processing and interviews at the Dulles Discovery Building - 13800 Air & Space Museum Pkwy, Chantilly VA. Here are the questions you may be asked, which as been verified by many applicants:

The polygraph has two sets of questions, counterintelligence and lifestyle. In addition, there is a stupid pretest, a post test interrogations, and a repeat of questions. It will take about 4 hours total.

Some of the "irrelevant" questions, where you should answer with a calm yes, are questions like:
- Is today Monday?
- Are we in virginia?
- Is your name XXX?
- Are you sitting down?


The counterintelligence questions are broad enough to cover everything, so they are something like:
- Do you have any financial stakes or property in a foreign country?
- Have you ever plotted to overthrow the US government?
- Have you ever had contact with a foreign agency?


The lifestyle questions are also broad and may be something like:
- Have you discussed the hiring process with anyone, either in person or online?
- Have you ever committed a crime for which you weren't caught?
- Have you used illegal drugs that you have not told us about?
- Did you intentionally falsify info on your application or security paperwork?


During the pre-test, if you admit to anything in these counterintelligence or lifestyle areas, you will be drilled in that area. If you spike the charts during the actual test in any of these areas, you will be drilled during the post-test interrogation.

The trick is, expect to be accused of lying, interrogated, and being told you are hiding something. Do not tell them anything, make no admissions. If you choose to use countermeasures, use the mental countermeasures described on the website Antipolygraph.org in the book The Lie Behind the Lie Detector. Do not try the breathing or biting countermeasures, they can be detected if you do them wrong.

Yes, I am exposing information here. Enjoy!
Posted by beat_the_system
 - May 30, 2018, 06:05 AM
Awkward and clumsy?  I doubt it.  I use various anonymous proxies and IP addresses.  But I know that it is just a minor layer of security that anyone with enough time on their hands can break through, if they cared to.  I use Tor sometimes, but this site sometimes loads real slow on Tor for me now probably because of this country's slow internet.  I do not live in the U.S. so even if my real "home" IP address and location was discovered, it means nothing to me.  We know who you are Dan, your phone number and mugshot are all over the internet.  I do not care to call you.  I will proudly say that not only am I with the anti-polygraph movement, I am also NOT a patriot with no loyalty to the U.S., so if I reveal national security secrets that I have obtained I don't give a fuck.  I am loyal to my family, true friends, and whoever is paying my salary.  That is all.  Props to Snowden, Wikileaks, Anonymous, and anyone else exposing government secrets.
Posted by Dan Mangan
 - May 29, 2018, 09:54 PM
beat_the_system,

Let's get real.

You are not only a troll, but you are a most awkward and clumsy troll.

Prove me wrong.

Call me at 603-801-5179 and we'll talk about it.

[cue crickets]

Posted by beat_the_system
 - May 29, 2018, 09:07 PM
Correction, I did not use Tor on my last post, I am using another anonymous proxy browser service.  But George, you were wrong.  In the previous posts that I linked to, one of the postings was mines under a different moniker, and the other person posting was not me.  We were both using Tor apparently and I don't know how we got the same IP.  Did you check the browser type and version, MAC address, and other unique identifiers?   

To add to this thread, I hear the CIA process has not changed much since the original posting.  Still located at Dulles Discovery, same polygraph machine and routine, still trying to make people admit to disqualifying stuff.  I know a few people who got hired and thanks to this site, they were able to cheat and beat the poly and hide their dirty deeds from CIA.  The beat-the-poly message is getting through to people!
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - May 29, 2018, 01:30 PM
Quote from: beat_the_system on May 29, 2018, 01:10 PMGive the posters a break.

Um, no. Sock puppetry violates AntiPolygraph.org's posting policy and will be exposed whenever possible. In the present example and the other to which you refer, we had extremely high levels of confidence that posts purporting to be from multiple authors were, in fact, the handiwork of a single individual.
Posted by beat_the_system
 - May 29, 2018, 01:10 PM
George/Admin,

I will admit that I am a long time viewer and poster on this site, thought I post under various IP addresses and screen names.  As you can see from your backend, I am posting through Tor.  This is not the first time you have suspected that the same person was chatting with themselves.  You suspected the same thing in this thread a few months ago:

https://antipolygraph.org/forum/index.php?topic=5570.msg43250#msg43250

Maybe the posters are actually different people.  I have used Tor and other anonymous proxies before and somehow ended up with the same IP address as someone else.  Shit happens.  Give the posters a break.  They are not trolling.  They are sharing their polygraph experiences.  The fact is, we have run out of IPv4 addresses, so duplicates will happen.

https://www.wired.com/2015/09/north-america-just-ran-old-school-internet-addresses/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv4_address_exhaustion
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-internet-has-run-out-of-ip-addresses-sort-of-ipv4/

Posted by Administrator
 - May 24, 2018, 01:13 PM
Off-topic replies have been moved to: this topic.
Posted by Anon582
 - May 23, 2018, 12:35 PM
Quote from: quickfix on May 19, 2018, 05:42 AMAnnette,

Thank you for sharing your experience with the CIA polygraph. I would be interested to know, if you don't mind sharing, approximately how long ago this was? For example, was it this year, last year, about five years ago?

I can tell you for CERTAINTY that this line of questioning has not been asked since the 90's, and even then it was tame and related to homosexuality. This is either a lie, or she took the test back in the 80's.
Posted by you may know who I am
 - May 20, 2018, 03:28 AM
Quote from: George_Maschke on May 19, 2018, 02:06 AMThe first question, "Is your middle name Ashley?" (yes) ..."Do you wear corrective lenses?" (yes)...  "Are you 26 years of age?" (yes)... "Is your mother's name Stephanie?". (yes) 

Annette, is this personal information true?  And did you use your real first name in this post?  Annette Ashley XXX who is 26 years old, wears glasses, with a mother named Stephanie.  Yeah, bye bye anonymity.

Quote from: George_Maschke on May 19, 2018, 02:06 AM"In you last relationship with a male did you have oral or anal sex?" (no).
Well, you are boring as fuck.  No wonder you did not get into the CIA.  You aren't slutty enough.  Yeesh.   :D

Posted by you may know who I am
 - May 20, 2018, 03:13 AM
I too would like more detail from Annette.  I took the CIA polygraph a few years ago and was not asked a single sexual-question...until the post-test/interrogation where the polygrapher just took a shot in the dark and asked me if I looked at some "pictures".  He did not say porn, but I knew what he meant.  So I proudly replied that I do look at porn, legal stuff, only at home.  I probably should have first made the polygrapher tell me what "pictures" he was referring to.  My CIA polygraph drilled me on criminal activity, and I know why.  Of course, I failed and was denied clearance and lost the job offer.  I didn't confess to anyting, but was suspected of deception and countermeasures.  This was during the Obama days.

Could the CIA have changed their policies in the Trump days and allowed for sex questions to be asked now when they think it is appropriate?