Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by xenonman
 - Mar 14, 2016, 03:43 PM
Quote from: quickfix on Mar 10, 2016, 02:45 PM
Quote from: quickfix on Mar 10, 2016, 07:19 AMit would be prudent to avoid including enough specific detail that you could be identified.

Exactly. You never know who's watching and listening.

Very true, especially given our friend here,  who is likely with the "Office of Security" thugs in Langley! ;D
Posted by Wandersmann
 - Mar 11, 2016, 01:35 PM
Quote from: George_Maschke on Mar 11, 2016, 10:08 AMIn addition, there is reason to believe that visitors to this site may be targeted for surveillance by the NSA via systems such as XKEYSCORE.
                   

Someone needs to check the National Archives to make certain that the original Constitution is still there.  If the above statement is true it sounds like the NSA must have taken it and is using it for toilet paper.  I recently heard that a failed polygraph constitutes probable cause in the Massachusetts court system.  If that is true the trend might eventually come to the USA.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Mar 11, 2016, 10:08 AM
Quote from: Wandersmann on Mar 11, 2016, 09:25 AMJust like in Nazi Germany.

The level of surveillance in the United States today is much greater than in Nazi Germany (or the DDR, for that matter). The Internet and other electronic communications has made mass surveillance cheap and enabled kinds of surveillance that weren't available in the past.

With respect to AntiPolygraph.org, readers should be aware that polygraphers in various federal agencies routinely read this forum and may attempt to identify individuals who post here.

In addition, there is reason to believe that visitors to this site may be targeted for surveillance by the NSA via systems such as XKEYSCORE.
Posted by Wandersmann
 - Mar 11, 2016, 09:25 AM
Quote from: quickfix on Mar 10, 2016, 02:45 PMExactly. You never know who's watching and listening.
                   


Just like in Nazi Germany.
Posted by quickfix
 - Mar 10, 2016, 02:45 PM
Quote from: quickfix on Mar 10, 2016, 07:19 AMit would be prudent to avoid including enough specific detail that you could be identified.

Exactly. You never know who's watching and listening.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Mar 10, 2016, 07:19 AM
bulldog62,

Should you choose to address downwithpolygraph's questions:

QuoteWhich agency did you take the polygraph for and for what job position?  Can you tell us the location you took your polygraph exam and the questions asked?  How/When did they tell you that you "failed"?

it would be prudent to avoid including enough specific detail that you could be identified.
Posted by downwithpolygraph
 - Mar 10, 2016, 05:38 AM
Sorry to hear your story.  Which agency did you take the polygraph for and for what job position?  Can you tell us the location you took your polygraph exam and the questions asked?  How/When did they tell you that you "failed"?

We try to give as much details as possible on this site.  It sounds like all polygraphers are running the same routine on candidates.  Accusing us all of withholding information and then coercing a false confession out of us.  Then we all go home sad and come to this site as some sort of group therapy to share our feelings.  Down with polygraph@