Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Type the third word in this sentence: 'The quick brown fox jumps.' (answer in lowercase):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Adam Apeman
 - Jul 23, 2011, 03:16 PM
Wow, reading this info has been an eye opener.  I'm glad the Employee Polygraph Protection Act exists, but it doesn't go far enough.  In the US, a polygraph can still be used in security companies, armored car companies, and pharmaceutical companies.  The government is also exempt. 

The EPPA should be expanded to cover all those.  Basically, it should be illegal to use a polygraph for anything other than a parlor trick.   This polygraph thing isn't any more reliable than tarot cards, pendulums, or horoscopes.