Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What sport is the Super Bowl associated with?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jul 01, 2010, 01:29 AM
Quote from: depressed on Jul 01, 2010, 01:06 AMWhy then do some fail on certain questions but not others when they have not done what they are being told they are lying about?

That's kind of like asking why a particular coin toss came out heads rather than tails. That said, polygraph operators know, for example, that illegal drug use is much more common than, say, espionage. Polygraph units that question applicants about both topics are going to flunk many times more applicants on the former than the latter because they know that the former is much more common in the applicant population.
Posted by depressed
 - Jul 01, 2010, 01:06 AM
Why then do some fail on certain questions but not others when they have not done what they are being told they are lying about?
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jul 01, 2010, 12:59 AM
I suppose that's possible, but it's hardly the only--or even necessarily the most likely explanation for a false positive outcome in such a situation. Polygraphy has no scientific basis, and it should surprise no one when such an invalid test produces erroneous results.
Posted by depressed
 - Jul 01, 2010, 12:37 AM
..that those in prior/current LE who take a poly for another agency and fail due to the "drugs or serious crime" portion, even though they have never committed one or used drugs, are subconsciously projecting their past work experience (which involved such issues - dealing with drugs and serious crimes from the public) into this question, and thus a "spike" in the question/answer (as deceptive)?