Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by flight815
 - Feb 28, 2010, 12:15 PM
I totally believe him on the artifact, I was shaking like a leaf.

Shame they do this to you to get a job...
Posted by Knightshaiid
 - Feb 27, 2010, 12:45 PM
It says in The Lie Behind The Lie Detector that the 'silent answer test' is supposedly a countermeasure, but the book goes on to say that this particular anti-CM's only purpose is to catch the examinee off guard. (Other anti-CM techniques are designed to get the examinee to answer differently, thus 'catching' you.)

In my opinion, your polygrapher either suspected counter-measures or was just doing it to throw you off. If he said he was doing it to reduce 'extensive artifacts' or anything else he was (again in my opinion) probably lying.

Posted by flight815
 - Feb 26, 2010, 10:05 PM
took another poly, which i passed.

this examiner did something interesting and for my last two "blocks" of questions, he told me instead of answering verbally, to just nod my head very slightly yes / no to answer.

is this normal? was it to mess with me? did they suspect CM or something? was there interference or some other reason?

i was pretty nervous and my hands/legs were shaking a little, so i didnt know if there was extensive artifact and they had me answer silently to reduce that?