Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What sport is the Super Bowl associated with?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by BBernie
 - Oct 26, 2009, 06:14 PM
I would be curious to know what were the questions that the polygrapher disputed with you?  Did the polygrapher even bother to tell you?  It jacks my jaw to know that politicians are seemingly exempt from this demeaning, intrusive process.  I always wonder why.  It felt like my credibility, integrity and trustworthiness were called into question...and now because I never received any info regarding my situation from the FBI, I believe that I have been unfairly labeled as a security risk.  I am still awaiting receipt of my FOIA applicant file.  Because I know this is not the case, I just decided to query this organization and find out how they justified their decision.  So far, they are not talking.  I've never been accused of being easily intimidated, which is the main purpose of a polygraph.
Posted by mrfire1701
 - Oct 26, 2009, 04:10 PM
Hello, took my first polygraph with the nsa about 2 weeks ago. Have to take a second..

what should I expect from the second one????

First one went smooth.. was told two questions bothered me..
I answered truthfully and denied any reasons why they did..