Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Samoset
 - Oct 22, 2009, 11:02 AM
By the way, I'd been reading through that thread on that forum, it seems some people had gotten IC's but had still been hired, the consensus there seemed to be that it had to be the condition of how you got the IC. For instance if you answered a question ahead of time or something it messed it up.  But I don't recall the ones who got an IC getting another test.
Posted by Samoset
 - Oct 22, 2009, 10:59 AM
Wow, so he didn't even get an inconclusive or is the inconclusive the same as a fail for a poly?

He didn't petition or make any sort of phone calls so that he could take another one, they just contacted him.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Oct 22, 2009, 10:47 AM
It's not so unusual for the FBI to grant a "re-test" to an applicant who has failed the polygraph but made no disqualifying admission. However, "re-tests" are a sham: virtually everyone granted one "fails" it, too.
Posted by Samoset
 - Oct 22, 2009, 10:21 AM
See here on this other forum, the msg at the bottom by Witchfinder:

http://community.federalsoup.com/4/OpenTopic?q=Y&a=tpc&s=4944011921&f=2024011031&m=7781045981&p=16

why do you think the guy was passed through?