Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Fair Chance
 - Sep 16, 2009, 11:29 AM
Dear mrfire1701,

No one is quick to answer your questions because no matter how the experience went, there is no rhyme or reason to what seems to happen afterward.  We have had many posts that come back "not within acceptable parameters" after very calm goodbyes.  Others come back OK.

Every Polygraph operator "artist" seems to have his/her own style and technique.  There is no uniformity of results.  From what you have posted, I can only give you a fifty-fifty based on the fact that prescreening test are notoriously tilted against the applicant if there are a surplus of applicants available.  They do not have to justify their results to you so you never know if things go well for you until you get to the next step in the application process.

Regards.
Posted by mrfire1701
 - Sep 16, 2009, 07:34 AM
Anyone have any opinion or feedback for this? Moderator? Any wise senior members? The guy with the American flag in the backrgound?
Posted by mrfire1701
 - Sep 15, 2009, 07:12 PM
Sorry if my writing will be bad English but I'm just covering my bases..
Took my polygraph last week. Answered all questions honestly.. Examiner came back and said that two questions showed a spike/abnormal reading.. and that it was 50/50.. I 100% answered correctly.  I informed examiner numerous times the same "no answer" everything I've told you is correct. I only had to take the 2 sections of the test twice. Asked examiner how I did.. Was told by the examiner that it wasn't up to him  and they it was to be reviewed by by upper authority. Wasn't asked at all about the possibility of coming for a retest..
How do you think I did? pass or fail?