Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many states are in the United States? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Fair Chance
 - Aug 24, 2008, 11:12 PM
This post is almost insulting.   AndyLY and dudeHappy intentionally use poor grammer and dialect repeatedly in almost the same syntax.  I guess the anti-polygraph crowd is having more of an effect on the system than anyone wants to admit.

George, I guess the website is starting to hit a few nerves.

Regards.
Posted by dudeHappy
 - Aug 24, 2008, 10:50 PM
dude, Something seems kinda weird and I kinda  agree with you.  The number of applicants is huge, those agencies can pick and choose whoevever they want but i dunno   an innocent person can fail and a guilty person can pass that is a fact

I get the feelin if an innocent person failed, they probably didn't want them anywayz and if a guilty person passed, they probably wantted him anywayz.

it seems retardedly lame to throw out an otherwise stellar candidate out for experimentation when they were young and maybe the polygrapher is told to get rid of a person so they do some tricks to make the graph of a liar appear cuz a better person was found.

Quote from: andyLY on Aug 19, 2008, 10:18 PMoopz  I meant do yo think my theory is possible?

I mean like if the NSA wants someone badly, they'll hire them (provided they are not drug smugglers / dealers / murderers / criminals / rapists ect)  if they want someone badly poly or no poly they want to hire that person

so my thoery is the govt wants to weed out people not as qualified as other people and throw them out with tthe poly

Posted by andyLY
 - Aug 19, 2008, 10:18 PM
oopz  I meant do yo think my theory is possible?

I mean like if the NSA wants someone badly, they'll hire them (provided they are not drug smugglers / dealers / murderers / criminals / rapists ect)  if they want someone badly poly or no poly they want to hire that person

so my thoery is the govt wants to weed out people not as qualified as other people and throw them out with tthe poly

Posted by andyLY
 - Aug 19, 2008, 10:13 PM
So like here's my theory:

the nsa or whatever agency hired 5 people for 5 slots (did not take poly or undergo clearance yet), but then they discover 3 super ultra qualified persons and want to get rid of the first 5 they hired.

So.... the poly people try to fail the first 5 by using the poly exam and let the other 3 pass easily regardless of wether they lied or not in the test.

Do yo agree or not?