Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last month of the year?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by T.M. Cullen
 - May 10, 2008, 02:06 PM
It may mean that he has to confer with his peers.  To see if the chart squigglies are "within acceptable parameters".

IOW, they have to further examine the tea leaves or consult their "spirit guides", before pronouncing judgement.  They may even have to consult with the chief witch doctor.

TC
Posted by CPD2B
 - May 09, 2008, 08:42 PM
I took my polygraph today and at the conclusion my polygrapher asked me about two questions of concern to him.  I explained the best I could about the questions, but never admitted to anything else, because I had told the truth to begin with.  Both questions were of the "Other than what you have told me" variety.

His questioning lasted for a short time and then he told me that it wasn't pass or fail.  He explained to me about where to go to get fingerprinted, and then said we were done.  He then walked me to the exit, and wished me good luck.

I am a little confused about what had happened.  I didn't understand why it wasn't a pass or fail polygraph.  How should I interpret how my polygraph went?