Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many states are in the United States? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jan 05, 2008, 11:28 AM
The key difference between computerized and "standard" (analog) polygraph instruments is that with the former, physiological measurements are recorded digitally, rather than with ink pens and a rolling paper chart. Regardless of the kind of polygraph instrument employed, the polygraph techniques in common use remain the same. Those contemplating using the polygraph countermeasures outlined in Chapter 4 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector need not alter their countermeasure strategies based on whether or not the polygraph instrument is computerized.
Posted by HelloYou
 - Jan 04, 2008, 08:48 PM
What are the differences between this and a standard polygraph?
Does the use of a "Computerized polygraph instrument" change how you use counter measures?