Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Type the last letter of the word, "America.":
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by EosJupiter
 - Apr 13, 2007, 01:37 PM
To all concerned,

This little gem, documented by both video and story, shows that the almighty FBI polygrapher  (Robert Hillend) couldn't get a simple stim test to produce valid data. Imagine that !!!  It was inconclusive. The subject openly admits to thinking and using an alternative number, a type of countermeasure. The subject was also a medical doctor, and was not overly impressed or intimidated by this polygrapher.  The story and video are priceless. Its just such a wonderful thing when they supply the ammo and proof.  

Regards ....  ;D

LINK: http://www.capitalnews9.com/content/top_stories/default.asp?ArID=209483

addendum:  04/14/07

Upon multiple review of the tape story, I believe its the reporter in the chair, not the doctor mentioned. But the results were still the same.  Accuracy counts here ....