Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is 10 minus 4? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by chobee36co
 - Feb 05, 2007, 05:14 PM
yankeedog I did not get a email. how can I recieveyour message
Posted by yankeedog
 - Feb 03, 2007, 08:47 PM
Chobee - I sent you a private message
Posted by chobee36co
 - Feb 03, 2007, 06:07 PM
 :D Thank you yankeedog :D. Do you have anymore studies? I also need some case law in reference to not being able to use CVSA
Posted by triple x
 - Feb 02, 2007, 11:43 PM
yankeedog,

Point taken...


triple x
Posted by yankeedog
 - Jan 30, 2007, 10:45 AM
The following research papers from various Journals and Periodicals clearly document the lack of validity and reliability of voice stress.  

Brenner, M., Branscomb, H. H., & Schwartz, G. E. (1979). Psychological stress evaluator - Two tests of a vocal measure. Psychophysiology, 16 (4), 351-357.

Cestaro, V. L. (1995). A Comparison Between Decision Accuracy Rates Obtained Using the Polygraph Instrument and the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA) (Report No. DoDPI95-R-0002). Fort McClellan, AL- Department of Defense Polygraph Institute.

Cestaro, V. L. (1996). A comparison of accuracy rates between detection of deception examinations using the polygraph and the computer voice stress analyzer in a mock crime scenario. (Report No. DoDPI95-R-0004). Fort McClellan, AL- Department of Defense

Cestaro, V. L., & Dollins, A. B. (1994). An analysis of voice responses for the detection of deception (Report No. DoDPI94-R-0001). Fort McClellan, AL- Department of Defense Polygraph Institute.

Horvath, F. (1978). An experimental comparison of the Psychological Stress Evaluator and the galvanic skin response in detection of deception.

Horvath, F. (1979). Effect of different motivational instructions on detection of deception with the Psychological Stress Evaluator and the galvanic skin response.

Horvath, F. (1982). Detecting deception: The promise and the reality of voice stress analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2, 340-351.

Janniro, M. J., & Cestaro, V. L. (1996). Effectiveness of detection of deception examinations using the computer voice stress analyzer.

Kubis, J. F. (1973) Comparison of voice analysis and polygraph as lie detection procedures (Contract DAD05-72-C-0217). U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, M.D.

Long, G. T., & Krall, V. L. (1990). The measurement of stress by voice analysis. Journal of social behavior and personality, 5(6), 723-731.

Lynch, B. E., & Henry, D. R. (1979). A validity study of the Psychological Stress Evaluator. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 11 (1), 89-94.

Nachshon, I., & Feldman, B. (1980). Vocal indices of psychological stress- A validation study of the Psychological Stress Evaluator.

Nachshon, I. Elaad, E., & Amsel, T. (1985). The validity of the Psychological Stress Evaluator.

O'Hair, D., & Cody, M. J. (1987). Gender and vocal stress differences during truthful and deceptive information sequences.

Palmatier Study The Validity and Comparative Accuracy of Voice Stress Analysis

Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. (1977). Physiological measure and the detection of deception.

Shipp, T., & Izdebski, K. (1981). Current evidence for the existence of laryngeal macrotremor and mictrotremor.

Suzuki, A., Watanabe, S., Taheno, Y., Kosugi, T., & Kasuya, T. (1973). Possibility of detecting deception by voice analysis. Reports of the National Institute of Police Science, 26, 62-66.

Timm, H. W. (1983). The efficacy of the Psychological Stress Evaluator in detecting deception. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 11, 62-68.

Waln, R. F., & Downey, R. G. (1987). Voice stress analysis- Use of telephone recordings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 379-389.
Posted by nonombre
 - Jan 30, 2007, 01:55 AM
Contact the American Polygraph Association (www.polygraph.org).  They have research results available regarding CVSA validity.

Good luck...

Nonombre
Posted by chobee36co
 - Jan 30, 2007, 12:45 AM
 :-[ :-[, I am a Law Enforcment Officer in Florida, I have been on the job for over 7 years. I was accused of an on duty policy violation in which I may lose my certifcate. I did not violate any policies or was I any where around the incident when it occured. I gave my statement and was suspended without pay. I stayed on suspension for 17 days. I was given three options 1. refuse to take CVSA and be terminated, 2. take the CVSA and if I failed I would be terminated or 3. confess to the crime and see what happens. I could not confess to something I had NO part of, I was not involved. There are two people stating I was involved only after they changed thier statements four times. The CVSA operator had tested the two accusors one week before me and I heard they had passed. How could they pass if they're lying, and how was operator going to pass me after they passed. According to my own research this is a stress test, I have been stressed for 17 days wondering what was going to happen! I have tried to research studies on the CVSA but unable to find complete studies, I have found many opinions of the studies. I am appealing the termination and will go infront of a board of my peers. I want to present entire studies and have several exapmles stating that the CVSA was wrong and not a valid test. I want to prove it is wrong more than it is right. Can anyone help me protect my family, my reputation and my career?