Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What sport is the Super Bowl associated with?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by 1904
 - Jun 18, 2007, 11:43 AM
Good One George.

But... add a tache, a pair of squarish specs, a crewcut -- and hey presto.
Roy Ortiz.

The photo got my mind to wandering (back 6-7 yrs). I was conducting p/g's at a company
in a 'suitable' suite provided by the client. It was the sick room.

Anyway, 3-4 subjects later a lady subject walks in. I asked her to please have a seat,
indicating to her to proceed into the adjacent room. In the meantime I was having a short break
and checking my voice-messages. when I walked into the testing room, she was lying prostrate
on the sick bed - naked.

I nearly fainted.

Poor Thing. she hadn't a clue as to what a 'lie detector test' might entail and said that she wasn't
"concentrating" - on what....??

The mind boggles.

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jun 17, 2007, 06:34 AM
Quote from: 1904 on Jun 15, 2007, 11:40 AMFirstly, I didnt know that the govt was hiring 'obvious' transsexual examiners. This gives me hope....

Of course, the poster simply chose (prudently) not to divulge the gender of his/her polygrapher to protect his/her anonymity. But imagine, if you will, the "horror"...

Come up to the polygraph suite...
Posted by 1904
 - Jun 15, 2007, 11:40 AM
Quote from: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2004, 03:19 PM

I stuck to my guns and denied such involvement.
I only admitted to what was true (marijuana experimentation ).  
I have been bothered that a family member had been arrested and served time for possessing and selling illegal drugs.  
He/she responded .......
Another law enforcement agency suggested that I had mishandled drug evidence.. ( tsk  tsk )
I informed him/her ......
He/she did not want to hear this.
He/she must have "forgotten" .....
It was my belief he/she was not ......
He/she never told me I "failed," .......
He/she told me that
he/she could not conduct additional tests unless
I provided him/her with additional information.  
He/she told me HQ would make the final decision.  

I hate to speculate, but I felt I had failed when I left. (aint that the truth )

I only learned of this site after the poly and I did not attempt any CM. ( we know...)
I relied on the truth , but also involved in the selling of drugs. (editing is fun )

Any input/observations would be appreciated.

Regards,
Anonymous

Firstly, I didnt know that the govt was hiring 'obvious' transsexual examiners. This gives me hope.
Then, perhaps you should have stuck to your guns. (Call 0800 TALIBAN )
Posted by fender85
 - Jan 30, 2007, 01:20 AM
SHould we really be allowing, people who live with there parents going through a mid life crisis to be able to be the judge all for people who have there crap together and are ready to go into a great job field.
Posted by gr8dad
 - Jan 26, 2007, 01:33 AM
ISBS is your typical polygrapher.  He would rather waste his time hurling insults at others rather than defend his "test".  Oh, thats right, it is impossible to defend a psuedoscience.   My bad!  Carry on ISBS, your posts are quite amusing!
Posted by IDIOTSSS
 - Nov 23, 2006, 12:23 AM
ok if you're wondering if you passed or not... you probably failed... sorry bud

Posted by dimas
 - Jul 18, 2004, 08:48 AM
Actually, both posts were posted by me and done to prove a point.   ISBS could be anyone or a multitude of nobodys.  Amazingly, however, he usually gets someone who is posted as "anonymous" or whatever other name to back up his often thoughtless and pointless arguments.  

ISBS is a "Loser" and a Nobody.   I think it is about time we all took the time to ignore him and perhaps he or they or whomever all the ISBS's are will go away.  

I think we have all wasted enough time on this issue.  Hopefully in the future, when those of us who frequent this board take the time to answer a question for someone the administrator could do us all a favor and remove ISBS's useless and insulting posts.

Posted by Administrator
 - Jul 18, 2004, 04:40 AM
The post by "ISBS is Full of it" posted 17 July 2004 at 10:17 P.M. and the post by "I-SMELL-BS" posted five minutes later, at 10:22 P.M., originated from the same IP address.

It is also doubtful whether the post dated 17 July at 8:03 P.M. purporting to be from Donald J. Krapohl, a researcher at the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute,  is authentic.

Any further posts to this message thread should substantially address the issues raised by the poster who originated it.
Posted by I-SMELL-BS
 - Jul 18, 2004, 01:22 AM
I apologize to everyone.   I realized the other day that I was venting all my anger at people that post here.  My life isn't going all to greatly.  I am quite lonely, lost my recent job at the Burger Hut and still live with my parents.   I wish I could say my wife even left me, but I have never been popular enough with the ladies to be able to get one to go out with me, so marriage has always been a long shot.  I guess you could say I am going through a mid-life crisis.   Well I gotta go, my dad needs to use his computer.  
Posted by ISBS is Full of it
 - Jul 18, 2004, 01:17 AM
Well Beech it appears that you have now found out what names ISBS is also posting as.  Very sad :'(
Posted by Donald J. Krapohl
 - Jul 17, 2004, 11:03 PM
Quote from: beech trees on Jul 17, 2004, 08:53 PM

Alas, mr. isbs, I am gainfully employed in the career of my choice after successfully employing countermeasures-- as is clearly described in the archive of my postings dating back to 2001.

Cheers,

I remember it a little differently, and I think ISBS's version is closer to the truth.
Posted by beech trees
 - Jul 17, 2004, 08:53 PM
Quote from: I-SMELL-BS on Jul 17, 2004, 06:58 PM


That is the bullshit I smell.  Dave, why don't you just admit it?  After all, it's no big deal.


Alas, mr. isbs, I am gainfully employed in the career of my choice after successfully employing countermeasures-- as is clearly described in the archive of my postings dating back to 2001.

Cheers,
Posted by I-SMELL-BS
 - Jul 17, 2004, 06:58 PM
Quote from: beech trees on Jul 16, 2004, 06:15 PM

It is clear from my post that I do not believe 'isbs' was quoting me.

It should also be clear from my invitation to back up the gratuitous assertion that it never happened.


That is the bullshit I smell.  Dave, why don't you just admit it?  After all, it's no big deal.

Posted by guest
 - Jul 16, 2004, 09:57 PM
Quote from: beech trees on Jul 16, 2004, 06:15 PM

It is clear from my post that I do not believe 'isbs' was quoting me.

It should also be clear from my invitation to back up the gratuitous assertion that it never happened.


If you weren't DQ'd for that, then what were you DQ'd for?
Posted by beech trees
 - Jul 16, 2004, 06:15 PM
Quote from: NeutralObserver on Jul 16, 2004, 05:37 PM

Dave, I don't think ISBS was quoting you, I think think he just made what you describe as a "gratuitous assertion", and I also observe that you have not denied that it is true.  

It is clear from my post that I do not believe 'isbs' was quoting me.

It should also be clear from my invitation to back up the gratuitous assertion that it never happened.