Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many states are in the United States? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by underlyingtruth
 - Jun 06, 2006, 11:21 PM
I assumed it could have something to do with a polygrapher being unwilling to test against themself.  If they give a test and the client fails, then they give the same test and they pass, they have a conflict.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jun 06, 2006, 06:48 PM
I assume the context to which you refer is that of a post-conviction polygraph screening program. I don't recall hearing of such a thing, but such a practice might be explained if the polygrapher is being evaluated on the basis of "post-test" admissions obtained.
Posted by underlyingtruth
 - Jun 05, 2006, 08:13 PM
I have found that a polygraph operater will refuse to retest an individual who failed, unless the individual makes some type of admission as to why they failed the first test.  

Has anybody else had or heard of this senario?