Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many states are in the United States? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Apr 13, 2006, 02:41 AM
micki,

To send a private message to nonombre, click on the "private message" icon () beneath his name in his post.

With regard to your question, I don't know whether the Canadian army trains any of its people to beat the polygraph. But polygraph "testing" has no scientific basis to begin with. It's possible to pass the polygraph using simple countermeasures that polygraphers have no demonstrated ability to detect. You'll find these techniques explained in Chapter 4 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector:

http://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf

AntiPolygraph.org makes this information publicly available and free to help truthful persons protect themselves against the risk of a false positive outcome. But this same information may also be used by liars attempting to fool investigators foolish enough to rely on polygraph chart readings.
Posted by nonombre
 - Apr 11, 2006, 10:56 PM
Micki,

Please write me at my anti-polygraph mail box and provide me some more details.  I might be of some help.

Regards,

Nonombre