Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Type the third word in this sentence: 'The quick brown fox jumps.' (answer in lowercase):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by willboywonder
 - Sep 16, 2005, 05:41 PM
You raise a good point.  A polygraph is not a predicter of future behavior.  If it were, then we'd never have federal agents betraying the government to sell secrets to foreign governments.  We often hear about such persons doing just that.  Why didn't the polygraph weed them out?
Posted by doctorM
 - Sep 11, 2005, 02:31 PM
It's just impossible to judge ones moral character on this machine. If you were to hook up the most notorious of immoral criminals to this machine, they would pass with flying colors. Do you think that people like Manson would pass? Of course, they can answer any question without the least bit of regard or concern. They have that screw loose where they are lacking the human element of distinguising right from wrong.

On the other hand, those that have high moral character will be bothered by such acusatory quetions (and they are acusatory) because they find such topics to be of a serious nature and are totally against everything in their moral fiber. To be falsely accused and disgraced would be sickening to the individual and devastating to ones career.

Maybe not all share this theory, but I think that this may be the case in many failed polygraph cases.

Any comments on this would be appreciated.