- Welcome to AntiPolygraph.org Message Board.
A forum for free and open discussion of polygraph-related topics
Posted by G Scalabr
- Jul 05, 2004, 02:44 AMQuoteHey Gino, haven't heard from you for a long time. Glad to see you crawled out from under your rock to defend your asshole buddy George.I'm not the one hiding behind a pseudonym. I have the courage to post under my real name, unlike you.
QuoteAnd Michael, Gino, and George do have the same lack of respect for the facts too.There have been a number of well-written rebuttals to Michael Moore's distortions. The same cannot be said for The Lie Behind the Lie Detector and the rest of the information featured here on this site. Perhaps you would consider diverting some of the time you spend figuring out such snappy personal attacks and comebacks and using it to author such a rebuttal?
Posted by I-SMELL-BS
- Jul 05, 2004, 02:04 AMQuote from: 007 on Jul 05, 2004, 01:50 AM
That's Michael Moore. His *other* movie is "Roger and Me"
Absolutely right, it is Michael as I correctly named him on previous posts where I compared him to George, and you are very sharp to also observe that he and George are almost identical twins. And Michael, Gino, and George do have the same lack of respect for the facts too.
Posted by 007
- Jul 05, 2004, 01:50 AMQuote from: I-SMELL-BS on Jul 04, 2004, 05:46 PM
Hey Gino, haven't heard from you for a long time. Glad to see you crawled out from under your rock to defend your asshole buddy George. But all a person has to do is to look at the pudgy picture that George plasters all over every one of his posts to see that he is as big a lard ass as Roger Moore. But then facts have never played a large part in anything you write have they Gino baby?
That's Michael Moore. His *other* movie is "Roger and Me"
You watch of lot of his movies? His fact checking is on a par with yours.
007
Posted by I-SMELL-BS
- Jul 04, 2004, 05:46 PMQuote from: Gino J. Scalabrini on Jul 04, 2004, 04:59 PM
There you go with the name calling and personal attacks again. Moreover, you are lying as well. George Maschke is not overweight, and to my knowledge never has been. Yet another fabrication on your part.
Hey Gino, haven't heard from you for a long time. Glad to see you crawled out from under your rock to defend your asshole buddy George. But all a person has to do is to look at the pudgy picture that George plasters all over every one of his posts to see that he is as big a lard ass as Roger Moore. But then facts have never played a large part in anything you write have they Gino baby?
Posted by G Scalabr
- Jul 04, 2004, 04:59 PMQuoteGeorge, just because your life is spent in engaging in an exercise in futility, doesn't mean mine has to be.If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. You certainly seem to spend a lot of your time here. And your attempts to take on George's arguments with name calling and personal insults cannot be categorized as anything else but futile.
QuoteI could offer all the proof in the world and you would simply deny it or delete it.If you have all that proof, why don't you post it? Why waste all the time with the personal attacks then? Just rip apart this site apart with facts and proof. We're all ears.
As far as censorship goes, I don't know of any other on-line message board with as much tolerance of an individual who continues to add nothing to the discussion and simply makes personal attacks against the operator of the site. On the bright side, your posts give neutral observers to this debate an insight into the behavior of polygraphers in a way that we could never could.
QuoteIf you want to prove your truthfulness (or more correctly lack thereof), why don't you tell us about all the things you admitted to during your polygraph examinations?If audio and video were recorded during all polygraph examinations (as George has called for numerous times), and these tapes were made available to everyone interrogated, George would easily be able to refute silly charges like yours.
QuoteOne thing is sure George, no one could accuse a tub of lard like you of being and "empty vessel".There you go with the name calling and personal attacks again. Moreover, you are lying as well. George Maschke is not overweight, and to my knowledge never has been. Yet another fabrication on your part. Why don't you just admit that the information contained on this site makes you ANGRY and that you don't know how to deal with it.
Posted by I-SMELL-BS
- Jul 04, 2004, 04:33 PMQuote from: George W. Maschke on Dec 31, 1969, 07:00 PMI have neither any desire nor any need to prove my truthfulness.
quote]
That much is obvious. And it is also obvious that you couldn't because you are in fact a liar and you are most certainly guilty of what you were accused of lying about on BOTH of your failed polygraph exams.
Posted by George W. Maschke
- Jul 04, 2004, 03:46 PMQuote from: I-SMELL-BS on Jul 04, 2004, 01:34 PM
George, just because your life is spent in engaging in an exercise in futility, doesn't mean mine has to be.
Actually you have devoted a signficant portion of your life to posting ad hominem attacks on this website over the past past two months or so. But you somehow haven't found the time to substantiate them.
Your failure to substaniate any of your allegations against me cannot be credibly attributed to concerns over wasting your time in a futile exercise.
QuoteIf you want to prove your truthfulness (or more correctly lack thereof), why don't you tell us about all the things you admitted to during your polygraph examinations?
I have neither any desire nor any need to prove my truthfulness. Indeed, there is no way that anyone could prove one's truthfulness regarding the relevant questions that were the subject of my FBI and LAPD polygraph examinations. One cannot prove that one has never used or sold an illegal drug or that one has never disclosed classified information to an unauthorized person or had unauthorized contacts with a foreign intelligence service. But I made no admission(s) to any such conduct, and my DoD background investigation turned up no evidence that I had.
It is you who would have others believe that I have engaged in some (as yet unspecified) unethical conduct and lied (about something). Your continued failure to back up your accusations with any evidence whatsoever strongly suggests that you are talking through your hat.
Posted by I-SMELL-BS
- Jul 04, 2004, 01:34 PMQuote from: George W. Maschke on Jul 04, 2004, 12:50 PM
Try me.
George, just because your life is spent in engaging in an exercise in futility, doesn't mean mine has to be. If you want to prove your truthfulness (or more correctly lack thereof), why don't you tell us about all the things you admitted to during your polygraph examinations?
Posted by George W. Maschke
- Jul 04, 2004, 12:50 PMQuote from: I-SMELL-BS on Jul 04, 2004, 12:34 PM
...I could offer all the proof in the world and you would simply deny it or delete it....
Try me.
Posted by I-SMELL-BS
- Jul 04, 2004, 12:34 PMQuote from: George W. Maschke on Jul 04, 2004, 09:13 AM
You've accused me of lacking integrity, but can't support your accusation with any examples. You've accused me of being a liar, but can't point out any lies I've supposedly told. I leave it to others to decide who is full of what.
George, is your head as thick as your ass? I have already spoken to this, let me repeat what I told you before; "There would be no point in doing that George, I could offer all the proof in the world and you would simply deny it or delete it. But I still say you are a liar and worse. And you know it as well as I do."
Posted by George W. Maschke
- Jul 04, 2004, 09:13 AMQuote from: I-SMELL-BS on Jul 03, 2004, 11:06 PM
One thing is sure George, no one could accuse a tub of lard like you of being and "empty vessel". You are completely full of shit.
You've accused me of lacking integrity, but can't support your accusation with any examples. You've accused me of being a liar, but can't point out any lies I've supposedly told. I leave it to others to decide who is full of what.
Posted by I-SMELL-BS
- Jul 03, 2004, 11:06 PMQuote from: George W. Maschke on Jul 03, 2004, 10:47 PM
You claim to be able to offer all the proof in the world, yet you haven't offered any at all. Empty vessels make the loudest noise.
One thing is sure George, no one could accuse a tub of lard like you of being and "empty vessel". You are completely full of shit.
Posted by George W. Maschke
- Jul 03, 2004, 10:47 PMQuote from: I-SMELL-BS on Jul 03, 2004, 10:27 PM
There would be no point in doing that George, I could offer all the proof in the world and you would simply deny it or delete it. But I still say you are a liar and worse. And you know it as well as I do.
You claim to be able to offer all the proof in the world, yet you haven't offered any at all. Empty vessels make the loudest noise.
Posted by I-SMELL-BS
- Jul 03, 2004, 10:27 PMQuote from: George W. Maschke on Jul 03, 2004, 04:44 PM
If you choose not be civil, then don't complain when your posts are deleted.
In your above post, you call me a liar. I challenge you to either back up this accusation with proof or to retract it. Specifically what lie(s) have I told?
I remind you that in a separate message thread, you accused me of "lacking integrity." But when I challenged you to support your accusation, for reasons you must surely know best, you chose not to do so.
There would be no point in doing that George, I could offer all the proof in the world and you would simply deny it or delete it. But I still say you are a liar and worse. And you know it as well as I do.
Posted by George W. Maschke
- Jul 03, 2004, 04:44 PMQuote from: I-SMELL-BS on Jul 03, 2004, 04:14 PM
I will try to comply George, but I don't think I can be civil. I mean when I'm dealing with liars, punks, and pompous bastards like you, only the strongest language adequately describes you.
If you choose not be civil, then don't complain when your posts are deleted.
In your above post, you call me a liar. I challenge you to either back up this accusation with proof or to retract it. Specifically what lie(s) have I told?
I remind you that in a separate message thread, you accused me of "lacking integrity." But when I challenged you to support your accusation, for reasons you must surely know best, you chose not to do so.