Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by mike3358
 - Feb 07, 2004, 01:50 AM
Since he/she can't back up with facts, I consider the post and the accusations therein, void.
Posted by Human Subject
 - Feb 05, 2004, 09:05 PM
Or he's trying to bait people into revealing more details than they'd otherwise be comfortable doing in an attempt to validate their accounts.

I've taken multiple federal polygraph exams.  I described at least one on this board, though I held back on a few of the details.  The accounts of others I have read here all sound plausible given my experiences.

What specifically do you think makes the accounts you read here implausible?
Posted by biggs
 - Feb 05, 2004, 08:27 PM
I get the idea that the dubious poster is a pissed off polygrapher who is a sore loser.  I could be wrong though.
Posted by mike3358
 - Feb 05, 2004, 03:39 PM
What facts do you have that prove "most" of the posts you spoke of are untrue?
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Feb 05, 2004, 02:37 AM
This message board is not censored. All points of view are welcome. If you have reason to believe that any post you've read is false, please feel free to post a rebuttal to it.

Note that AntiPolygraph.org's literature on polygraph countermeasures is free. See, The Lie Behind the Lie Detector.
Posted by 69
 - Feb 04, 2004, 11:32 PM
I have read many of the reports, on this site, regarding pre-employment polys- more specifically fed government poly exams.  I am not an expert and do not wish to deliberate the effectiveness and reliability of the exam, but most of the stories of the exams, are untrue.

I doubt that most of the people that have posted stories have even taken an poly.  In fact, allowing these false postings only encourages people to want to buy literature on these so called countermeasures.