Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Norman
 - Jun 10, 2016, 06:38 PM
I took the phase 2 writing assessment today for an FBI intelligence analyst job and I hit a problem.

I did the assessment well as per my training with the information that I was given.  I gave an intro, a body with flowing logic, and the "so what" recommendations.  It looked alright.

I thought that it should be fine but after finishing the assessment I realized that my recommendations could have, and should have, been far more specific.  It's too late to fix it but I am psyching myself out thinking about it.

I read online in another forum that one individual had 5 pages written.  I wrote 1 condensed for brevity and clarity as I was trained to do.  This guy might have had a vastly different type of assessment but it has me concerned.

That brings me to my question.  What specifically would the grading IA be looking for?  Have I potentially screwed myself over?

I think that I will be a fantastic IA, but it may not go much further if I hit a wall here.

Thank you in advance.